From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 128614 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2017 22:56:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128575 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2017 22:56:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: torfep02.bell.net Received: from simcoe208srvr.owm.bell.net (HELO torfep02.bell.net) (184.150.200.208) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:55:58 +0000 Received: from bell.net torfep02 184.150.200.158 by torfep02.bell.net with ESMTP id <20170225225556.YBFD21971.torfep02.bell.net@torspm01.bell.net> for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:55:56 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.10] (really [174.91.91.223]) by torspm01.bell.net with ESMTP id <20170225225556.FMTU4115.torspm01.bell.net@[192.168.2.10]>; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:55:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new hook for max_align_t_align Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: John David Anglin In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 23:46:00 -0000 Cc: Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , Florian Weimer , Carlos O'Donell , Jason Merrill , Bernd Edlinger , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <939D59FC-61B5-44E3-9E7D-DA7BEF580390@bell.net> References: <305D4697-79B3-4B69-8741-98BFC00A5ECE@bell.net> <856A3FEF-7A0D-43D4-9CBF-23939E7861C4@bell.net> <6C68EDB9-5933-4127-978E-807ABC7F31C7@bell.net> <519be582-d8e5-a6ef-f699-90a21250180b@bell.net> <88e889ee-dec9-5fef-db19-02f4d91d9156@redhat.com> <20161012072540.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161012080208.GK7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <6f8d9eff-adef-79a4-b67d-732106705d40@redhat.com> To: Gerald Pfeifer X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg01566.txt.bz2 On 2017-02-25, at 5:32 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, John David Anglin wrote: >>> Sooo, why not deprecate 32-bit HP-UX with GCC 7? >> GCC 7 is in reasonable shape on 32-bit HP-UX. I'll do it after it is=20 >> released. >=20 > If you deprecate it with GCC 7, it'd be only removed with GCC 8. >=20 > On the other hand, if you deprecate it past GCC 7, removal would=20 > happen with GCC 9 (by default). Exactly. I'm happy with that and don't want to require --enable-obsolete t= o build GCC 7. Dave -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net