From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23652 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2016 12:33:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23438 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2016 12:33:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=market, ship, stand X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:33:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 488F983F3B; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-7-139.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.139]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9CCXHRi004178; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:33:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new hook for max_align_t_align To: John David Anglin , Jakub Jelinek References: <305D4697-79B3-4B69-8741-98BFC00A5ECE@bell.net> <856A3FEF-7A0D-43D4-9CBF-23939E7861C4@bell.net> <6C68EDB9-5933-4127-978E-807ABC7F31C7@bell.net> <519be582-d8e5-a6ef-f699-90a21250180b@bell.net> <88e889ee-dec9-5fef-db19-02f4d91d9156@redhat.com> <20161012072540.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161012080208.GK7282@tucnak.redhat.com> Cc: Florian Weimer , "Carlos O'Donell" , Jason Merrill , Bernd Edlinger , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Jeff Law From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <946f9b72-ca43-9306-9546-20b32793f9e0@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:33:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00875.txt.bz2 On 10/12/2016 02:12 PM, John David Anglin wrote: > On 2016-10-12, at 4:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >>> Since this is PA-RISC, which is essentially dead (neither HPE nor Debian >>> ship it anymore), I stand by my suggestion to bump the fundamental alignment >> >> Or just drop support for a dead arch? > > Hardware is still available on the second hand market. So is the Commodore 64, but is that enough though to keep supporting PA in gcc? Anyone who wants to do retrocomputing can still use gcc-6 or earlier versions. Bernd