From: Stamatis Markianos-Wright <stam.markianos-wright@arm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:31:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <949f5dd0-cdf0-715a-f04c-3de80c9b974f@arm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5489 bytes --]
Hi all,
This is the 2/2 patch that contains the functional changes needed
for MVE Tail Predicated Low Overhead Loops. See my previous email
for a general introduction of MVE LOLs.
This support is added through the already existing loop-doloop
mechanisms that are used for non-MVE dls/le looping.
Mid-end changes are:
1) Relax the loop-doloop mechanism in the mid-end to allow for
decrement numbers other that -1 and for `count` to be an
rtx containing a simple REG (which in this case will contain
the number of elements to be processed), rather
than an expression for calculating the number of iterations.
2) Added a new df utility function: `df_bb_regno_only_def_find` that
will return the DEF of a REG if it is DEF-ed only once within the
basic block.
And many things in the backend to implement the above optimisation:
3) Implement the `arm_predict_doloop_p` target hook to instruct the
mid-end about Low Overhead Loops (MVE or not), as well as
`arm_loop_unroll_adjust` which will prevent unrolling of any loops
that are valid for becoming MVE Tail_Predicated Low Overhead Loops
(unrolling can transform a loop in ways that invalidate the dlstp/
letp tranformation logic and the benefit of the dlstp/letp loop
would be considerably higher than that of unrolling)
4) Appropriate changes to the define_expand of doloop_end, new
patterns for dlstp and letp, new iterators, unspecs, etc.
5) `arm_mve_loop_valid_for_dlstp` and a number of checking functions:
* `arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter`
* `arm_mve_dlstp_check_inc_counter`
* `arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems`
* `arm_mve_check_df_chain_back_for_implic_predic`
* `arm_mve_check_df_chain_fwd_for_implic_predic_impact`
This all, in smoe way or another, are running checks on the loop
structure in order to determine if the loop is valid for dlstp/letp
transformation.
6) `arm_attempt_dlstp_transform`: (called from the define_expand of
doloop_end) this function re-checks for the loop's suitability for
dlstp/letp transformation and then implements it, if possible.
7) Various utility functions:
*`arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes` to map
from vctp unspecs to number of lanes, and `arm_get_required_vpr_reg`
to check an insn to see if it requires the VPR or not.
* `arm_mve_get_loop_vctp`
* `arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes`
* `arm_emit_mve_unpredicated_insn_to_seq`
* `arm_get_required_vpr_reg`
* `arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param`
* `arm_get_required_vpr_reg_ret_val`
* `arm_mve_is_across_vector_insn`
* `arm_is_mve_load_store_insn`
* `arm_mve_vec_insn_is_predicated_with_this_predicate`
* `arm_mve_vec_insn_is_unpredicated_or_uses_other_predicate`
No regressions on arm-none-eabi with various targets and on
aarch64-none-elf. Thoughts on getting this into trunk?
Thank you,
Stam Markianos-Wright
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/arm/arm-protos.h (arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob): Rename to...
(arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob): ...this
(arm_attempt_dlstp_transform): New.
* config/arm/arm.cc (TARGET_LOOP_UNROLL_ADJUST): New.
(TARGET_PREDICT_DOLOOP_P): New.
(arm_block_set_vect):
(arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob): Rename from arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob.
(arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob): New.
(arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes): New.
(arm_get_required_vpr_reg): New.
(arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param): New.
(arm_get_required_vpr_reg_ret_val): New.
(arm_mve_get_loop_vctp): New.
(arm_mve_vec_insn_is_unpredicated_or_uses_other_predicate): New.
(arm_mve_vec_insn_is_predicated_with_this_predicate): New.
(arm_mve_check_df_chain_back_for_implic_predic): New.
(arm_mve_check_df_chain_fwd_for_implic_predic_impact): New.
(arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems): New.
(arm_mve_dlstp_check_inc_counter): New.
(arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter): New.
(arm_mve_loop_valid_for_dlstp): New.
(arm_mve_is_across_vector_insn): New.
(arm_is_mve_load_store_insn): New.
(arm_predict_doloop_p): New.
(arm_loop_unroll_adjust): New.
(arm_emit_mve_unpredicated_insn_to_seq): New.
(arm_attempt_dlstp_transform): New.
* config/arm/iterators.md (DLSTP): New.
(mode1): Add DLSTP mappings.
* config/arm/mve.md (*predicated_doloop_end_internal): New.
(dlstp<mode1>_insn): New.
* config/arm/thumb2.md (doloop_end): Update for MVE LOLs.
* config/arm/unspecs.md: New unspecs.
* df-core.cc (df_bb_regno_only_def_find): New.
* df.h (df_bb_regno_only_def_find): New.
* loop-doloop.cc (doloop_condition_get): Relax conditions.
(doloop_optimize): Add support for elementwise LoLs.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/lob.h: Update framework.
* gcc.target/arm/lob1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/arm/lob6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c: New test.
[-- Attachment #2: 2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 105189 bytes --]
commit 8564dee09c1258c388094abd614f311e60723368
Author: Stam Markianos-Wright <stam.markianos-wright@arm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 18 17:42:56 2022 +0100
arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops
This is the 2/2 patch that contains the functional changes needed
for MVE Tail Predicated Low Overhead Loops. See my previous email
for a general introduction of MVE LOLs.
This support is added through the already existing loop-doloop
mechanisms that are used for non-MVE dls/le looping.
Mid-end changes are:
1) Relax the loop-doloop mechanism in the mid-end to allow for
decrement numbers other that -1 and for `count` to be an
rtx containing a simple REG (which in this case will contain
the number of elements to be processed), rather
than an expression for calculating the number of iterations.
2) Added a new df utility function: `df_bb_regno_only_def_find` that
will return the DEF of a REG if it is DEF-ed only once within the
basic block.
And many things in the backend to implement the above optimisation:
3) Implement the `arm_predict_doloop_p` target hook to instruct the
mid-end about Low Overhead Loops (MVE or not), as well as
`arm_loop_unroll_adjust` which will prevent unrolling of any loops
that are valid for becoming MVE Tail_Predicated Low Overhead Loops
(unrolling can transform a loop in ways that invalidate the dlstp/
letp tranformation logic and the benefit of the dlstp/letp loop
would be considerably higher than that of unrolling)
4) Appropriate changes to the define_expand of doloop_end, new
patterns for dlstp and letp, new iterators, unspecs, etc.
5) `arm_mve_loop_valid_for_dlstp` and a number of checking functions:
* `arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter`
* `arm_mve_dlstp_check_inc_counter`
* `arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems`
* `arm_mve_check_df_chain_back_for_implic_predic`
* `arm_mve_check_df_chain_fwd_for_implic_predic_impact`
This all, in smoe way or another, are running checks on the loop
structure in order to determine if the loop is valid for dlstp/letp
transformation.
6) `arm_attempt_dlstp_transform`: (called from the define_expand of
doloop_end) this function re-checks for the loop's suitability for
dlstp/letp transformation and then implements it, if possible.
7) Various utility functions:
*`arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes` to map
from vctp unspecs to number of lanes, and `arm_get_required_vpr_reg`
to check an insn to see if it requires the VPR or not.
* `arm_mve_get_loop_vctp`
* `arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes`
* `arm_emit_mve_unpredicated_insn_to_seq`
* `arm_get_required_vpr_reg`
* `arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param`
* `arm_get_required_vpr_reg_ret_val`
* `arm_mve_is_across_vector_insn`
* `arm_is_mve_load_store_insn`
* `arm_mve_vec_insn_is_predicated_with_this_predicate`
* `arm_mve_vec_insn_is_unpredicated_or_uses_other_predicate`
No regressions on arm-none-eabi with various targets and on
aarch64-none-elf. Thoughts on getting this into trunk?
Thank you,
Stam Markianos-Wright
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/arm/arm-protos.h (arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob): Rename to...
(arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob): ...this
(arm_attempt_dlstp_transform): New.
* config/arm/arm.cc (TARGET_LOOP_UNROLL_ADJUST): New.
(TARGET_PREDICT_DOLOOP_P): New.
(arm_block_set_vect):
(arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob): Rename from arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob.
(arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob): New.
(arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes): New.
(arm_get_required_vpr_reg): New.
(arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param): New.
(arm_get_required_vpr_reg_ret_val): New.
(arm_mve_get_loop_vctp): New.
(arm_mve_vec_insn_is_unpredicated_or_uses_other_predicate): New.
(arm_mve_vec_insn_is_predicated_with_this_predicate): New.
(arm_mve_check_df_chain_back_for_implic_predic): New.
(arm_mve_check_df_chain_fwd_for_implic_predic_impact): New.
(arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems): New.
(arm_mve_dlstp_check_inc_counter): New.
(arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter): New.
(arm_mve_loop_valid_for_dlstp): New.
(arm_mve_is_across_vector_insn): New.
(arm_is_mve_load_store_insn): New.
(arm_predict_doloop_p): New.
(arm_loop_unroll_adjust): New.
(arm_emit_mve_unpredicated_insn_to_seq): New.
(arm_attempt_dlstp_transform): New.
* config/arm/iterators.md (DLSTP): New.
(mode1): Add DLSTP mappings.
* config/arm/mve.md (*predicated_doloop_end_internal): New.
(dlstp<mode1>_insn): New.
* config/arm/thumb2.md (doloop_end): Update for MVE LOLs.
* config/arm/unspecs.md: New unspecs.
* df-core.cc (df_bb_regno_only_def_find): New.
* df.h (df_bb_regno_only_def_find): New.
* loop-doloop.cc (doloop_condition_get): Relax conditions.
(doloop_optimize): Add support for elementwise LoLs.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/lob.h: Update framework.
* gcc.target/arm/lob1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/arm/lob6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h
index 77e76336e94..74186930f0b 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ extern void arm_emit_speculation_barrier_function (void);
extern void arm_decompose_di_binop (rtx, rtx, rtx *, rtx *, rtx *, rtx *);
extern bool arm_q_bit_access (void);
extern bool arm_ge_bits_access (void);
-extern bool arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob (rtx);
-
+extern bool arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob (basic_block);
+extern rtx arm_attempt_dlstp_transform (rtx);
#ifdef RTX_CODE
enum reg_class
arm_mode_base_reg_class (machine_mode);
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
index 6e933c80183..39d97ba5e4d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
@@ -659,6 +659,12 @@ static const struct attribute_spec arm_attribute_table[] =
#undef TARGET_HAVE_CONDITIONAL_EXECUTION
#define TARGET_HAVE_CONDITIONAL_EXECUTION arm_have_conditional_execution
+#undef TARGET_LOOP_UNROLL_ADJUST
+#define TARGET_LOOP_UNROLL_ADJUST arm_loop_unroll_adjust
+
+#undef TARGET_PREDICT_DOLOOP_P
+#define TARGET_PREDICT_DOLOOP_P arm_predict_doloop_p
+
#undef TARGET_LEGITIMATE_CONSTANT_P
#define TARGET_LEGITIMATE_CONSTANT_P arm_legitimate_constant_p
@@ -34416,19 +34422,1096 @@ arm_invalid_within_doloop (const rtx_insn *insn)
}
bool
-arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob (rtx insn)
+arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob (basic_block bb)
{
- basic_block bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
/* Make sure the basic block of the target insn is a simple latch
having as single predecessor and successor the body of the loop
itself. Only simple loops with a single basic block as body are
supported for 'low over head loop' making sure that LE target is
above LE itself in the generated code. */
-
return single_succ_p (bb)
- && single_pred_p (bb)
- && single_succ_edge (bb)->dest == single_pred_edge (bb)->src
- && contains_no_active_insn_p (bb);
+ && single_pred_p (bb)
+ && single_succ_edge (bb)->dest == single_pred_edge (bb)->src;
+}
+
+/* Utility fuction: Given a VCTP or a VCTP_M insn, return the number of MVE
+ lanes based on the machine mode being used. */
+
+static int
+arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes (rtx x)
+{
+ if (GET_CODE (x) == SET && GET_CODE (XEXP (x, 1)) == UNSPEC
+ && (XINT (XEXP (x, 1), 1) == VCTP || XINT (XEXP (x, 1), 1) == VCTP_M))
+ {
+ machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (XEXP (x, 1));
+ return (VECTOR_MODE_P (mode) && VALID_MVE_PRED_MODE (mode))
+ ? GET_MODE_NUNITS (mode) : 0;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Check if INSN requires the use of the VPR reg, if it does, return the
+ sub-rtx of the VPR reg. The TYPE argument controls whether
+ this function should:
+ * For TYPE == 0, check all operands, including the OUT operands,
+ and return the first occurrence of the VPR reg.
+ * For TYPE == 1, only check the input operands.
+ * For TYPE == 2, only check the output operands.
+ (INOUT operands are considered both as input and output operands)
+*/
+static rtx
+arm_get_required_vpr_reg (rtx_insn *insn, unsigned int type = 0)
+{
+ gcc_assert (type < 3);
+ if (!NONJUMP_INSN_P (insn))
+ return NULL_RTX;
+
+ bool requires_vpr;
+ extract_constrain_insn (insn);
+ int n_operands = recog_data.n_operands;
+ if (recog_data.n_alternatives == 0)
+ return NULL_RTX;
+
+ /* Fill in recog_op_alt with information about the constraints of
+ this insn. */
+ preprocess_constraints (insn);
+
+ for (int op = 0; op < n_operands; op++)
+ {
+ requires_vpr = true;
+ if (type == 1 && recog_data.operand_type[op] == OP_OUT)
+ continue;
+ else if (type == 2 && recog_data.operand_type[op] == OP_IN)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Iterate through alternatives of operand "op" in recog_op_alt and
+ identify if the operand is required to be the VPR. */
+ for (int alt = 0; alt < recog_data.n_alternatives; alt++)
+ {
+ const operand_alternative *op_alt
+ = &recog_op_alt[alt * n_operands];
+ /* Fetch the reg_class for each entry and check it against the
+ VPR_REG reg_class. */
+ if (alternative_class (op_alt, op) != VPR_REG)
+ requires_vpr = false;
+ }
+ /* If all alternatives of the insn require the VPR reg for this operand,
+ it means that either this is VPR-generating instruction, like a vctp,
+ vcmp, etc., or it is a VPT-predicated insruction. Return the subrtx
+ of the VPR reg operand. */
+ if (requires_vpr)
+ return recog_data.operand[op];
+ }
+ return NULL_RTX;
+}
+
+/* Wrapper function of arm_get_required_vpr_reg with TYPE == 1, so return
+ something only if the VPR reg is an input operand to the insn. */
+
+static rtx
+ALWAYS_INLINE
+arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param (rtx_insn *insn)
+{
+ return arm_get_required_vpr_reg (insn, 1);
+}
+
+/* Wrapper function of arm_get_required_vpr_reg with TYPE == 2, so return
+ something only if the VPR reg is the return value, an output of, or is
+ clobbered by the insn. */
+
+static rtx
+ALWAYS_INLINE
+arm_get_required_vpr_reg_ret_val (rtx_insn *insn)
+{
+ return arm_get_required_vpr_reg (insn, 2);
+}
+
+/* Scan the basic block of a loop body for a vctp instruction. If there is
+ at least vctp instruction, return the first rtx_insn *. */
+
+static rtx_insn *
+arm_mve_get_loop_vctp (basic_block bb)
+{
+ rtx_insn *insn = BB_HEAD (bb);
+
+ /* Now scan through all the instruction patterns and pick out the VCTP
+ instruction. We require arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param to be false
+ to make sure we pick up a VCTP, rather than a VCTP_M. */
+ FOR_BB_INSNS (bb, insn)
+ if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
+ if (arm_get_required_vpr_reg_ret_val (insn)
+ && (arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes (PATTERN (insn)) != 0)
+ && !arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param (insn))
+ return insn;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/* Return true if INSN is a MVE instruction that is VPT-predicable, but in
+ its unpredicated form, or if it is predicated, but on a predicate other
+ than VPR_REG. */
+
+static bool
+arm_mve_vec_insn_is_unpredicated_or_uses_other_predicate (rtx_insn *insn,
+ rtx vpr_reg)
+{
+ rtx insn_vpr_reg_operand;
+ if (MVE_VPT_UNPREDICATED_INSN_P (insn)
+ || (MVE_VPT_PREDICATED_INSN_P (insn)
+ && (insn_vpr_reg_operand = arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param (insn))
+ && !rtx_equal_p (vpr_reg, insn_vpr_reg_operand)))
+ return true;
+ else
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* Return true if INSN is a MVE instruction that is VPT-predicable and is
+ predicated on VPR_REG. */
+
+static bool
+arm_mve_vec_insn_is_predicated_with_this_predicate (rtx_insn *insn,
+ rtx vpr_reg)
+{
+ rtx insn_vpr_reg_operand;
+ if (MVE_VPT_PREDICATED_INSN_P (insn)
+ && (insn_vpr_reg_operand = arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param (insn))
+ && rtx_equal_p (vpr_reg, insn_vpr_reg_operand))
+ return true;
+ else
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* Utility function to identify if INSN is an MVE instruction that performs
+ some across-vector operation (and as a result does not align with normal
+ lane predication rules). All such instructions give one only scalar
+ output, except for vshlcq which gives a PARALLEL of a vector and a scalar
+ (one vector result and one carry output). */
+
+static bool
+arm_is_mve_across_vector_insn (rtx_insn* insn)
+{
+ df_ref insn_defs = NULL;
+ if (!MVE_VPT_PREDICABLE_INSN_P (insn))
+ return false;
+
+ bool is_across_vector = false;
+ FOR_EACH_INSN_DEF (insn_defs, insn)
+ if (!VALID_MVE_MODE (GET_MODE (DF_REF_REG (insn_defs)))
+ && !arm_get_required_vpr_reg_ret_val (insn))
+ is_across_vector = true;
+
+ return is_across_vector;
+}
+
+/* Utility function to identify if INSN is an MVE load or store instruction.
+ * For TYPE == 0, check all operands. If the function returns true,
+ INSN is a load or a store insn.
+ * For TYPE == 1, only check the input operands. If the function returns
+ true, INSN is a load insn.
+ * For TYPE == 2, only check the output operands. If the function returns
+ true, INSN is a store insn. */
+
+static bool
+arm_is_mve_load_store_insn (rtx_insn* insn, int type = 0)
+{
+ int n_operands = recog_data.n_operands;
+ extract_insn (insn);
+
+ for (int op = 0; op < n_operands; op++)
+ {
+ if (type == 1 && recog_data.operand_type[op] == OP_OUT)
+ continue;
+ else if (type == 2 && recog_data.operand_type[op] == OP_IN)
+ continue;
+ if (mve_memory_operand (recog_data.operand[op],
+ GET_MODE (recog_data.operand[op])))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* When transforming an MVE intrinsic loop into an MVE Tail Predicated Low
+ Overhead Loop, there are a number of instructions that, if in their
+ unpredicated form, act across vector lanes, but are still safe to include
+ within the loop, despite the implicit predication added to the vector lanes.
+ This list has been compiled by carefully analyzing the instruction
+ pseudocode in the Arm-ARM.
+ All other across-vector instructions aren't allowed, because the addition
+ of implicit predication could influnce the result of the operation.
+ Any new across-vector instructions to the MVE ISA will have to assessed for
+ inclusion to this list. */
+
+static bool
+arm_mve_is_allowed_unpredic_across_vector_insn (rtx_insn* insn)
+{
+ gcc_assert (MVE_VPT_UNPREDICATED_INSN_P (insn)
+ && arm_is_mve_across_vector_insn (insn));
+ rtx insn_pattern = PATTERN (insn);
+ if (GET_CODE (insn_pattern) == SET
+ && GET_CODE (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1)) == UNSPEC
+ && (XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDVQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDVQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDVAQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDVAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLADAVQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLADAVQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLADAVXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLADAVAQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLADAVAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLADAVAXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VABAVQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VABAVQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDLVQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDLVQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDLVAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDLVAQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDVAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VADDVAQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMAXVQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMAXAVQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLALDAVQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLALDAVXQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLALDAVXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLALDAVQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLALDAVAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLALDAVAQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLALDAVAXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLALDAVAXQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLSDAVQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLSDAVXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLSDAVAXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLSDAVAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLSLDAVQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLSLDAVXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLSLDAVAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VMLSLDAVAXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLALDAVHXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLALDAVHQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLALDAVHQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLALDAVHAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLALDAVHAQ_U
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLALDAVHAXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLSLDAVHQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLSLDAVHXQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLSLDAVHAQ_S
+ || XINT (XEXP (insn_pattern, 1), 1) == VRMLSLDAVHAXQ_S))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
+
+/* Recursively scan through the DF chain backwards within the basic block and
+ determine if any of the USEs of the original insn (or the USEs of the insns
+ where thy were DEF-ed, etc., recursively) were affected by implicit VPT
+ predication of an MVE_VPT_UNPREDICATED_INSN_P in a dlstp/letp loop.
+ This function returns true if the insn is affected implicit predication
+ and false otherwise.
+ Having such implicit predication on an unpredicated insn wouldn't in itself
+ block tail predication, because the output of that insn might then be used
+ in a correctly predicated store insn, where the disabled lanes will be
+ ignored. To verify this we later call:
+ `arm_mve_check_df_chain_fwd_for_implic_predic_impact`, which will check the
+ DF chains forward to see if any implicitly-predicated operand gets used in
+ an improper way. */
+
+static bool
+arm_mve_check_df_chain_back_for_implic_predic
+ (hash_map<int_hash<int, -1, -2>, bool>* safe_insn_map, rtx_insn *insn,
+ rtx vctp_vpr_generated)
+{
+ bool* temp = NULL;
+ if ((temp = safe_insn_map->get (INSN_UID (insn))))
+ return *temp;
+
+ basic_block body = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
+ /* The circumstances under which an instruction is affected by "implicit
+ predication" are as follows:
+ * It is an UNPREDICATED_INSN_P:
+ * That loads/stores from/to memory.
+ * Where any one of its operands is an MVE vector from outside the
+ loop body bb.
+ Or:
+ * Any of it's operands, recursively backwards, are affected. */
+ if (MVE_VPT_UNPREDICATED_INSN_P (insn)
+ && (arm_is_mve_load_store_insn (insn)
+ || (arm_is_mve_across_vector_insn (insn)
+ && !arm_mve_is_allowed_unpredic_across_vector_insn (insn))))
+ {
+ safe_insn_map->put (INSN_UID (insn), true);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ df_ref insn_uses = NULL;
+ FOR_EACH_INSN_USE (insn_uses, insn)
+ {
+ /* If the operand is in the input reg set to the the basic block,
+ (i.e. it has come from outside the loop!), consider it unsafe if:
+ * It's being used in an unpredicated insn.
+ * It is a predicable MVE vector. */
+ if (MVE_VPT_UNPREDICATED_INSN_P (insn)
+ && VALID_MVE_MODE (GET_MODE (DF_REF_REG (insn_uses)))
+ && REGNO_REG_SET_P (DF_LR_IN (body), DF_REF_REGNO (insn_uses)))
+ {
+ safe_insn_map->put (INSN_UID (insn), true);
+ return true;
+ }
+ /* Scan backwards from the current INSN through the instruction chain
+ until the start of the basic block. */
+ for (rtx_insn *prev_insn = PREV_INSN (insn);
+ prev_insn && prev_insn != PREV_INSN (BB_HEAD (body));
+ prev_insn = PREV_INSN (prev_insn))
+ {
+ /* If a previous insn defines a register that INSN uses, then recurse
+ in order to check that insn's USEs.
+ If any of these insns return true as MVE_VPT_UNPREDICATED_INSN_Ps,
+ then the whole chain is affected by the change in behaviour from
+ being placed in dlstp/letp loop. */
+ df_ref prev_insn_defs = NULL;
+ FOR_EACH_INSN_DEF (prev_insn_defs, prev_insn)
+ {
+ if (DF_REF_REGNO (insn_uses) == DF_REF_REGNO (prev_insn_defs)
+ && !arm_mve_vec_insn_is_predicated_with_this_predicate
+ (insn, vctp_vpr_generated)
+ && arm_mve_check_df_chain_back_for_implic_predic
+ (safe_insn_map, prev_insn, vctp_vpr_generated))
+ {
+ safe_insn_map->put (INSN_UID (insn), true);
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ safe_insn_map->put (INSN_UID (insn), false);
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* If we have identified that the current DEF will be modified
+ by such implicit predication, scan through all the
+ insns that USE it and bail out if any one is outside the
+ current basic block (i.e. the reg is live after the loop)
+ or if any are store insns that are unpredicated or using a
+ predicate other than the loop VPR.
+ This function returns true if the insn is not suitable for
+ implicit predication and false otherwise.*/
+
+static bool
+arm_mve_check_df_chain_fwd_for_implic_predic_impact (rtx_insn *insn,
+ rtx vctp_vpr_generated)
+{
+
+ /* If this insn is indeed an unpredicated store to memory, bail out. */
+ if (arm_mve_vec_insn_is_unpredicated_or_uses_other_predicate
+ (insn, vctp_vpr_generated)
+ && (arm_is_mve_load_store_insn (insn, 2)
+ || arm_is_mve_across_vector_insn (insn)))
+ return true;
+
+ /* Next, scan forward to the various USEs of the DEFs in this insn. */
+ df_ref insn_def = NULL;
+ FOR_EACH_INSN_DEF (insn_def, insn)
+ {
+ for (df_ref use = DF_REG_USE_CHAIN (DF_REF_REGNO (insn_def)); use;
+ use = DF_REF_NEXT_REG (use))
+ {
+ rtx_insn *next_use_insn = DF_REF_INSN (use);
+ if (next_use_insn != insn
+ && NONDEBUG_INSN_P (next_use_insn))
+ {
+ /* If the USE is outside the loop body bb, or it is inside, but
+ is an differently-predicated store to memory or it is any
+ across-vector instruction. */
+ if (BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn) != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (next_use_insn)
+ || (arm_mve_vec_insn_is_unpredicated_or_uses_other_predicate
+ (next_use_insn, vctp_vpr_generated)
+ && (arm_is_mve_load_store_insn (next_use_insn, 2)
+ || arm_is_mve_across_vector_insn (next_use_insn))))
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* Helper function to `arm_mve_dlstp_check_inc_counter` and to
+ `arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter`. In the situations where the loop counter
+ is incrementing by 1 or decrementing by 1 in each iteration, ensure that the
+ target value or the initialisation value, respectively, was a calculation
+ of the number of iterations of the loop, which is expected to be an ASHIFTRT
+ by VCTP_STEP. */
+
+static bool
+arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems (basic_block body, rtx reg, rtx vctp_step)
+{
+ /* Ok, we now know the loop starts from zero and increments by one.
+ Now just show that the max value of the counter came from an
+ appropriate ASHIFRT expr of the correct amount. */
+ basic_block pre_loop_bb = body->prev_bb;
+ while (pre_loop_bb && BB_END (pre_loop_bb)
+ && !df_bb_regno_only_def_find (pre_loop_bb, REGNO (reg)))
+ pre_loop_bb = pre_loop_bb->prev_bb;
+
+ df_ref counter_max_last_def = df_bb_regno_only_def_find (pre_loop_bb, REGNO (reg));
+ rtx counter_max_last_set;
+ if (counter_max_last_def)
+ counter_max_last_set = PATTERN (DF_REF_INSN (counter_max_last_def));
+ else
+ return false;
+
+ /* If we encounter a simple SET from a REG, follow it through. */
+ if (GET_CODE (counter_max_last_set) == SET
+ && REG_P (XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1)))
+ return arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems
+ (pre_loop_bb->next_bb, XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1), vctp_step);
+
+ /* If we encounter a SET from an IF_THEN_ELSE where one of the operands is a
+ constant and the other is a REG, follow through to that REG. */
+ if (GET_CODE (counter_max_last_set) == SET
+ && GET_CODE (XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1)) == IF_THEN_ELSE
+ && REG_P (XEXP (XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1), 1))
+ && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1), 2)))
+ return arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems
+ (pre_loop_bb->next_bb, XEXP (XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1), 1), vctp_step);
+
+ if (GET_CODE (XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1)) == ASHIFTRT
+ && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1), 1))
+ && ((1 << INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (counter_max_last_set, 1), 1)))
+ == abs (INTVAL (vctp_step))))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* If we have identified the loop to have an incrementing counter, we need to
+ make sure that it increments by 1 and that the loop is structured correctly:
+ * The counter starts from 0
+ * The counter terminates at (num_of_elem + num_of_lanes - 1) / num_of_lanes
+ * The vctp insn uses a reg that decrements appropriately in each iteration.
+*/
+
+static rtx_insn*
+arm_mve_dlstp_check_inc_counter (basic_block body, rtx_insn* vctp_insn,
+ rtx condconst, rtx condcount)
+{
+ rtx vctp_reg = XVECEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (vctp_insn), 1), 0, 0);
+ /* The loop latch has to be empty. When compiling all the known MVE LoLs in
+ user applications, none of those with incrementing counters had any real
+ insns in the loop latch. As such, this function has only been tested with
+ an empty latch and may misbehave or ICE if we somehow get here with an
+ increment in the latch, so, for correctness, error out early. */
+ rtx_insn *dec_insn = BB_END (body->loop_father->latch);
+ if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (dec_insn))
+ return NULL;
+
+ class rtx_iv vctp_reg_iv;
+ /* For loops of type B) the loop counter is independent of the decrement
+ of the reg used in the vctp_insn. So run iv analysis on that reg. This
+ has to succeed for such loops to be supported. */
+ if (!iv_analyze (vctp_insn, as_a<scalar_int_mode> (GET_MODE (vctp_reg)),
+ vctp_reg, &vctp_reg_iv))
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Find where both of those are modified in the loop body bb. */
+ rtx condcount_reg_set
+ = PATTERN (DF_REF_INSN (df_bb_regno_only_def_find
+ (body, REGNO (condcount))));
+ rtx vctp_reg_set = PATTERN (DF_REF_INSN (df_bb_regno_only_def_find
+ (body, REGNO (vctp_reg))));
+ if (!vctp_reg_set || !condcount_reg_set)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (REG_P (condcount) && REG_P (condconst))
+ {
+ /* First we need to prove that the loop is going 0..condconst with an
+ inc of 1 in each iteration. */
+ if (GET_CODE (XEXP (condcount_reg_set, 1)) == PLUS
+ && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (XEXP (condcount_reg_set, 1), 1))
+ && INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (condcount_reg_set, 1), 1)) == 1)
+ {
+ rtx counter_reg = XEXP (condcount_reg_set, 0);
+ /* Check that the counter did indeed start from zero. */
+ df_ref this_set = DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN (REGNO (counter_reg));
+ if (!this_set)
+ return NULL;
+ df_ref last_set = DF_REF_NEXT_REG (this_set);
+ if (!last_set)
+ return NULL;
+ rtx_insn* last_set_insn = DF_REF_INSN (last_set);
+ if (!single_set (last_set_insn))
+ return NULL;
+ rtx counter_orig_set;
+ counter_orig_set = XEXP (PATTERN (last_set_insn), 1);
+ if (!CONST_INT_P (counter_orig_set)
+ || (INTVAL (counter_orig_set) != 0))
+ return NULL;
+ /* And finally check that the target value of the counter,
+ condconst is of the correct shape. */
+ if (!arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems (body, condconst,
+ vctp_reg_iv.step))
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ else
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ else
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Extract the decrementnum of the vctp reg. */
+ int decrementnum = abs (INTVAL (vctp_reg_iv.step));
+ /* Ensure it matches the number of lanes of the vctp instruction. */
+ if (decrementnum != arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes (PATTERN (vctp_insn)))
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Everything looks valid. */
+ return vctp_insn;
+}
+
+/* Helper function to `arm_mve_loop_valid_for_dlstp`. In the case of a
+ counter that is decrementing, ensure that it is decrementing by the
+ right amount in each iteration and that the target condition is what
+ we expect. */
+
+static rtx_insn*
+arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter (basic_block body, rtx_insn* vctp_insn,
+ rtx condconst, rtx condcount)
+{
+ rtx vctp_reg = XVECEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (vctp_insn), 1), 0, 0);
+ class rtx_iv vctp_reg_iv;
+ int decrementnum;
+ /* For decrementing loops of type A), the counter is usually present in the
+ loop latch. Here we simply need to verify that this counter is the same
+ reg that is also used in the vctp_insn and that it is not otherwise
+ modified. */
+ rtx_insn *dec_insn = BB_END (body->loop_father->latch);
+ /* If not in the loop latch, try to find the decrement in the loop body. */
+ if (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (dec_insn))
+ {
+ df_ref temp = df_bb_regno_only_def_find (body, REGNO (condcount));
+ /* If we haven't been able to find the decrement, bail out. */
+ if (!temp)
+ return NULL;
+ dec_insn = DF_REF_INSN (temp);
+ }
+
+ /* Next, ensure that it is a PLUS of the form:
+ (set (reg a) (plus (reg a) (const_int)))
+ where (reg a) is the same as condcount. */
+ if (GET_CODE (XEXP (PATTERN (dec_insn), 1)) == PLUS
+ && REGNO (XEXP (PATTERN (dec_insn), 0))
+ == REGNO (XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (dec_insn), 1), 0))
+ && REGNO (XEXP (PATTERN (dec_insn), 0)) == REGNO (condcount))
+ decrementnum = abs (INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (dec_insn), 1), 1)));
+ else
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Ok, so we now know the loop decrement. If it is a 1, then we need to
+ look at the loop vctp_reg and verify that it also decrements correctly.
+ Then, we need to establish that the starting value of the loop decrement
+ originates from the starting value of the vctp decrement. */
+ if (decrementnum == 1)
+ {
+ class rtx_iv vctp_reg_iv;
+ /* The loop counter is found to be independent of the decrement
+ of the reg used in the vctp_insn, again. Ensure that IV analysis
+ succeeds and check the step. */
+ if (!iv_analyze (vctp_insn, as_a<scalar_int_mode> (GET_MODE (vctp_reg)),
+ vctp_reg, &vctp_reg_iv))
+ return NULL;
+ /* Ensure it matches the number of lanes of the vctp instruction. */
+ if (abs (INTVAL (vctp_reg_iv.step))
+ != arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes (PATTERN (vctp_insn)))
+ return NULL;
+ if (!arm_mve_check_reg_origin_is_num_elems (body, condcount, vctp_reg_iv.step))
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ /* If the decrements are the same, then the situation is simple: either they
+ are also the same reg, which is safe, or they are different registers, in
+ which case makse sure that there is a only simple SET from one to the
+ other inside the loop.*/
+ else if (decrementnum == arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes (PATTERN (vctp_insn)))
+ {
+ if (REGNO (condcount) != REGNO (vctp_reg))
+ {
+ /* It wasn't the same reg, but it could be behild a
+ (set (vctp_reg) (condcount)), so instead find where
+ the VCTP insn is DEF'd inside the loop. */
+ rtx vctp_reg_set =
+ PATTERN (DF_REF_INSN (df_bb_regno_only_def_find
+ (body, REGNO (vctp_reg))));
+ /* This must just be a simple SET from the condcount. */
+ if (GET_CODE (vctp_reg_set) != SET || !REG_P (XEXP (vctp_reg_set, 1))
+ || REGNO (XEXP (vctp_reg_set, 1)) != REGNO (condcount))
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* We now only need to find out that the loop terminates with a LE
+ zero condition. If condconst is a const_int, then this is easy.
+ If its a REG, look at the last condition+jump in a bb before
+ the loop, because that usually will have a branch jumping over
+ the loop body. */
+ if (CONST_INT_P (condconst)
+ && !(INTVAL (condconst) == 0 && JUMP_P (BB_END (body))
+ && GET_CODE (XEXP (PATTERN (BB_END (body)), 1)) == IF_THEN_ELSE
+ && (GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (BB_END (body)), 1), 0)) == NE
+ ||GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (BB_END (body)), 1), 0)) == GT)))
+ return NULL;
+ else if (REG_P (condconst))
+ {
+ basic_block pre_loop_bb = body;
+ while (pre_loop_bb->prev_bb && BB_END (pre_loop_bb->prev_bb)
+ && !JUMP_P (BB_END (pre_loop_bb->prev_bb)))
+ pre_loop_bb = pre_loop_bb->prev_bb;
+ if (pre_loop_bb && BB_END (pre_loop_bb))
+ pre_loop_bb = pre_loop_bb->prev_bb;
+ else
+ return NULL;
+ rtx initial_compare = NULL_RTX;
+ if (!(prev_nonnote_nondebug_insn_bb (BB_END (pre_loop_bb))
+ && INSN_P (prev_nonnote_nondebug_insn_bb (BB_END (pre_loop_bb)))))
+ return NULL;
+ else
+ initial_compare
+ = PATTERN (prev_nonnote_nondebug_insn_bb (BB_END (pre_loop_bb)));
+ if (!(initial_compare && GET_CODE (initial_compare) == SET
+ && cc_register (XEXP (initial_compare, 0), VOIDmode)
+ && GET_CODE (XEXP (initial_compare, 1)) == COMPARE
+ && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (XEXP (initial_compare, 1), 1))
+ && INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (initial_compare, 1), 1)) == 0))
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Usually this is a LE condition, but it can also just be a GT or an EQ
+ condition (if the value is unsigned or the compiler knows its not negative) */
+ rtx_insn *loop_jumpover = BB_END (pre_loop_bb);
+ if (!(JUMP_P (loop_jumpover)
+ && GET_CODE (XEXP (PATTERN (loop_jumpover), 1)) == IF_THEN_ELSE
+ && (GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (loop_jumpover), 1), 0)) == LE
+ || GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (loop_jumpover), 1), 0)) == GT
+ || GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (loop_jumpover), 1), 0)) == EQ)))
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ /* Everything looks valid. */
+ return vctp_insn;
+}
+
+/* Function to check a loop's structure to see if it is a valid candidate for
+ an MVE Tail Predicated Low-Overhead Loop. Returns the loop's VCTP_INSN if
+ it is valid, or NULL if it isn't. */
+
+static rtx_insn*
+arm_mve_loop_valid_for_dlstp (basic_block body)
+{
+ /* Doloop can only be done "elementwise" with predicated dlstp/letp if it
+ contains a VCTP on the number of elements processed by the loop.
+ Find the VCTP predicate generation inside the loop body BB. */
+ rtx_insn *vctp_insn = arm_mve_get_loop_vctp (body);
+ if (!vctp_insn)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* There are only two types of loops that can be turned into dlstp/letp
+ loops:
+ A) Loops of the form:
+ while (num_of_elem > 0)
+ {
+ p = vctp<size> (num_of_elem)
+ n -= num_of_lanes;
+ }
+ B) Loops of the form:
+ int num_of_iters = (num_of_elem + num_of_lanes - 1) / num_of_lanes
+ for (i = 0; i < num_of_iters; i++)
+ {
+ p = vctp<size> (num_of_elem)
+ n -= num_of_lanes;
+ }
+
+ Then, depending on the type of loop above we need will need to do
+ different sets of checks. */
+ iv_analysis_loop_init (body->loop_father);
+
+ /* In order to find out if the loop is of type A or B above look for the
+ loop counter: it will either be incrementing by one per iteration or
+ it will be decrementing by num_of_lanes. We can find the loop counter
+ in the condition at the end of the loop. */
+ rtx_insn *loop_cond = prev_nonnote_nondebug_insn_bb (BB_END (body));
+ if (!(cc_register (XEXP (PATTERN (loop_cond), 0), VOIDmode)
+ && GET_CODE (XEXP (PATTERN (loop_cond), 1)) == COMPARE))
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* The operands in the condition: Try to identify which one is the
+ constant and which is the counter and run IV analysis on the latter. */
+ rtx cond_arg_1 = XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (loop_cond), 1), 0);
+ rtx cond_arg_2 = XEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (loop_cond), 1), 1);
+
+ rtx loop_cond_constant;
+ rtx loop_counter;
+ class rtx_iv cond_counter_iv, cond_temp_iv;
+
+ if (CONST_INT_P (cond_arg_1))
+ {
+ /* cond_arg_1 is the constant and cond_arg_2 is the counter. */
+ loop_cond_constant = cond_arg_1;
+ loop_counter = cond_arg_2;
+ iv_analyze (loop_cond, as_a<scalar_int_mode> (GET_MODE (cond_arg_2)),
+ cond_arg_2, &cond_counter_iv);
+ }
+ else if (CONST_INT_P (cond_arg_2))
+ {
+ /* cond_arg_2 is the constant and cond_arg_1 is the counter. */
+ loop_cond_constant = cond_arg_2;
+ loop_counter = cond_arg_1;
+ iv_analyze (loop_cond, as_a<scalar_int_mode> (GET_MODE (cond_arg_1)),
+ cond_arg_1, &cond_counter_iv);
+ }
+ else if (REG_P (cond_arg_1) && REG_P (cond_arg_2))
+ {
+ /* If both operands to the compare are REGs, we can safely
+ run IV analysis on both and then determine which is the
+ constant by looking at the step.
+ First assume cond_arg_1 is the counter. */
+ loop_counter = cond_arg_1;
+ loop_cond_constant = cond_arg_2;
+ iv_analyze (loop_cond, as_a<scalar_int_mode> (GET_MODE (cond_arg_1)),
+ cond_arg_1, &cond_counter_iv);
+ iv_analyze (loop_cond, as_a<scalar_int_mode> (GET_MODE (cond_arg_2)),
+ cond_arg_2, &cond_temp_iv);
+
+ if (!CONST_INT_P (cond_counter_iv.step) || !CONST_INT_P (cond_temp_iv.step))
+ return NULL;
+ /* Look at the steps and swap around the rtx's if needed. Error out if
+ one of them cannot be identified as constant. */
+ if (INTVAL (cond_counter_iv.step) != 0 && INTVAL (cond_temp_iv.step) != 0)
+ return NULL;
+ if (INTVAL (cond_counter_iv.step) == 0 && INTVAL (cond_temp_iv.step) != 0)
+ {
+ loop_counter = cond_arg_2;
+ loop_cond_constant = cond_arg_1;
+ cond_counter_iv = cond_temp_iv;
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (!REG_P (loop_counter))
+ return NULL;
+ if (!(REG_P (loop_cond_constant) || CONST_INT_P (loop_cond_constant)))
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Now we have extracted the IV step of the loop counter, call the
+ appropriate checking function. */
+ if (INTVAL (cond_counter_iv.step) > 0)
+ return arm_mve_dlstp_check_inc_counter (body, vctp_insn,
+ loop_cond_constant, loop_counter);
+ else if (INTVAL (cond_counter_iv.step) < 0)
+ return arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter (body, vctp_insn,
+ loop_cond_constant, loop_counter);
+ else
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/* Predict whether the given loop in gimple will be transformed in the RTL
+ doloop_optimize pass. */
+
+static bool
+arm_predict_doloop_p (struct loop *loop)
+{
+ gcc_assert (loop);
+ /* On arm, targetm.can_use_doloop_p is actually
+ can_use_doloop_if_innermost. Ensure the loop is innermost,
+ it is valid and as per arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob and the
+ correct architecture flags are enabled. */
+ if (!(TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB && optimize > 0))
+ {
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Predict doloop failure due to"
+ " target architecture or optimisation flags.\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ else if (loop->inner != NULL)
+ {
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Predict doloop failure due to"
+ " loop nesting.\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ else if (!arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob (loop->header->next_bb))
+ {
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Predict doloop failure due to"
+ " loop bb complexity.\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* Implement targetm.loop_unroll_adjust. Use this to block unrolling of loops
+ that may later be turned into MVE Tail Predicated Low Overhead Loops. The
+ performance benefit of an MVE LoL is likely to be much higher than that of
+ the unrolling. */
+
+unsigned
+arm_loop_unroll_adjust (unsigned nunroll, struct loop *loop)
+{
+ if (TARGET_HAVE_MVE
+ && arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob (loop->latch)
+ && arm_mve_loop_valid_for_dlstp (loop->header))
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return nunroll;
+}
+
+/* Function to hadle emitting a VPT-unpredicated version of a VPT-predicated
+ insn to a sequence. */
+
+static bool
+arm_emit_mve_unpredicated_insn_to_seq (rtx_insn* insn)
+{
+ rtx insn_vpr_reg_operand = arm_get_required_vpr_reg_param (insn);
+ int new_icode = get_attr_mve_unpredicated_insn (insn);
+ if (!in_sequence_p ()
+ || !MVE_VPT_PREDICATED_INSN_P (insn)
+ || (!insn_vpr_reg_operand)
+ || (!new_icode))
+ return false;
+
+ extract_insn (insn);
+ rtx arr[8];
+ int j = 0;
+
+ /* When transforming a VPT-predicated instruction
+ into its unpredicated equivalent we need to drop
+ the VPR operand and we may need to also drop a
+ merge "vuninit" input operand, depending on the
+ instruction pattern. Here ensure that we have at
+ most a two-operand difference between the two
+ instrunctions. */
+ int n_operands_diff
+ = recog_data.n_operands - insn_data[new_icode].n_operands;
+ if (!(n_operands_diff > 0 && n_operands_diff <= 2))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Then, loop through the operands of the predicated
+ instruction, and retain the ones that map to the
+ unpredicated instruction. */
+ for (int i = 0; i < recog_data.n_operands; i++)
+ {
+ /* Ignore the VPR and, if needed, the vuninit
+ operand. */
+ if (insn_vpr_reg_operand == recog_data.operand[i]
+ || (n_operands_diff == 2
+ && !strcmp (recog_data.constraints[i], "0")))
+ continue;
+ else
+ {
+ arr[j] = recog_data.operand[i];
+ j++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Finally, emit the upredicated instruction. */
+ switch (j)
+ {
+ case 1:
+ emit_insn (GEN_FCN (new_icode) (arr[0]));
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ emit_insn (GEN_FCN (new_icode) (arr[0], arr[1]));
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ emit_insn (GEN_FCN (new_icode) (arr[0], arr[1], arr[2]));
+ break;
+ case 4:
+ emit_insn (GEN_FCN (new_icode) (arr[0], arr[1], arr[2],
+ arr[3]));
+ break;
+ case 5:
+ emit_insn (GEN_FCN (new_icode) (arr[0], arr[1], arr[2], arr[3],
+ arr[4]));
+ break;
+ case 6:
+ emit_insn (GEN_FCN (new_icode) (arr[0], arr[1], arr[2], arr[3],
+ arr[4], arr[5]));
+ break;
+ case 7:
+ emit_insn (GEN_FCN (new_icode) (arr[0], arr[1], arr[2], arr[3],
+ arr[4], arr[5], arr[6]));
+ break;
+ default:
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* When a vctp insn is used, its out is often followed by
+ a zero-extend insn to SImode, which is then SUBREG'd into a
+ vector form of mode VALID_MVE_PRED_MODE: this vector form is
+ what is then used as an input to the instructions within the
+ loop. Hence, store that vector form of the VPR reg into
+ vctp_vpr_generated, so that we can match it with instructions
+ in the loop to determine if they are predicated on this same
+ VPR. If there is no zero-extend and subreg or it is otherwise
+ invalid, then return NULL to cancel the dlstp transform. */
+
+static rtx
+arm_mve_get_vctp_vec_form (rtx_insn *insn)
+{
+ rtx vctp_vpr_generated = NULL_RTX;
+ rtx_insn *next_use1 = NULL;
+ df_ref use;
+ for (use
+ = DF_REG_USE_CHAIN
+ (DF_REF_REGNO (DF_INSN_INFO_DEFS (DF_INSN_INFO_GET (insn))));
+ use; use = DF_REF_NEXT_REG (use))
+ if (!next_use1 && NONDEBUG_INSN_P (DF_REF_INSN (use)))
+ next_use1 = DF_REF_INSN (use);
+
+ if (single_set (next_use1)
+ && GET_CODE (SET_SRC (single_set (next_use1))) == ZERO_EXTEND)
+ {
+ rtx_insn *next_use2 = NULL;
+ for (use
+ = DF_REG_USE_CHAIN
+ (DF_REF_REGNO
+ (DF_INSN_INFO_DEFS (DF_INSN_INFO_GET (next_use1))));
+ use; use = DF_REF_NEXT_REG (use))
+ if (!next_use2 && NONDEBUG_INSN_P (DF_REF_INSN (use)))
+ next_use2 = DF_REF_INSN (use);
+
+ if (single_set (next_use2)
+ && GET_CODE (SET_SRC (single_set (next_use2))) == SUBREG)
+ vctp_vpr_generated = XEXP (PATTERN (next_use2), 0);
+ }
+
+ if (!vctp_vpr_generated || !REG_P (vctp_vpr_generated)
+ || !VALID_MVE_PRED_MODE (GET_MODE (vctp_vpr_generated)))
+ return NULL_RTX;
+
+ return vctp_vpr_generated;
+}
+
+/* Attempt to transform the loop contents of loop basic block from VPT
+ predicated insns into unpredicated insns for a dlstp/letp loop. */
+
+rtx
+arm_attempt_dlstp_transform (rtx label)
+{
+ basic_block body = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (label)->prev_bb;
+
+ /* Ensure that the bb is within a loop that has all required metadata. */
+ if (!body->loop_father || !body->loop_father->header
+ || !body->loop_father->simple_loop_desc)
+ return GEN_INT (1);
+
+ rtx_insn *vctp_insn = arm_mve_loop_valid_for_dlstp (body);
+ if (!vctp_insn)
+ return GEN_INT (1);
+ rtx vctp_reg = XVECEXP (XEXP (PATTERN (vctp_insn), 1), 0, 0);
+
+ rtx vctp_vpr_generated = arm_mve_get_vctp_vec_form (vctp_insn);
+ if (!vctp_vpr_generated)
+ return GEN_INT (1);
+
+ /* decrementunum is already known to be valid at this point. */
+ int decrementnum = arm_mve_get_vctp_lanes (PATTERN (vctp_insn));
+
+ rtx_insn *insn = 0;
+ rtx_insn *cur_insn = 0;
+ rtx_insn *seq;
+ hash_map<int_hash<int, -1, -2>, bool>* safe_insn_map
+ = new hash_map<int_hash<int, -1, -2>,
+ bool>;
+
+ /* Scan through the insns in the loop bb and emit the transformed bb
+ insns to a sequence. */
+ start_sequence ();
+ FOR_BB_INSNS (body, insn)
+ {
+ if (GET_CODE (insn) == CODE_LABEL || NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK_P (insn))
+ continue;
+ else if (NOTE_P (insn))
+ emit_note ((enum insn_note)NOTE_KIND (insn));
+ else if (DEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
+ emit_debug_insn (PATTERN (insn));
+ else if (!INSN_P (insn))
+ {
+ end_sequence ();
+ return GEN_INT (1);
+ }
+ /* When we find the vctp instruction: continue. */
+ else if (insn == vctp_insn)
+ continue;
+ /* If the insn pattern requires the use of the VPR value from the
+ vctp as an input parameter for predication. */
+ else if (arm_mve_vec_insn_is_predicated_with_this_predicate
+ (insn, vctp_vpr_generated))
+ {
+ bool success = arm_emit_mve_unpredicated_insn_to_seq (insn);
+ if (!success)
+ {
+ end_sequence ();
+ return GEN_INT (1);
+ }
+ }
+ /* If the insn isn't VPT predicated on vctp_vpr_generated, we need to
+ make sure that it is still valid within the dlstp/letp loop. */
+ else
+ {
+ /* If this instruction USE-s the vctp_vpr_generated other than for
+ predication, this blocks the transformation as we are not allowed
+ to optimise the VPR value away. */
+ df_ref insn_uses = NULL;
+ FOR_EACH_INSN_USE (insn_uses, insn)
+ {
+ if (rtx_equal_p (vctp_vpr_generated, DF_REF_REG (insn_uses)))
+ {
+ end_sequence ();
+ return GEN_INT (1);
+ }
+ }
+ /* If within the loop we have an MVE vector instruction that is
+ unpredicated, the dlstp/letp looping will add implicit
+ predication to it. This will result in a change in behaviour
+ of the instruction, so we need to find out if any instructions
+ that feed into the current instruction were implicitly
+ predicated. */
+ if (arm_mve_check_df_chain_back_for_implic_predic
+ (safe_insn_map, insn, vctp_vpr_generated))
+ {
+ if (arm_mve_check_df_chain_fwd_for_implic_predic_impact
+ (insn, vctp_vpr_generated))
+ {
+ end_sequence ();
+ return GEN_INT (1);
+ }
+ }
+ emit_insn (PATTERN (insn));
+ }
+ }
+ seq = get_insns ();
+ end_sequence ();
+
+ /* Re-write the entire BB contents with the transformed
+ sequence. */
+ FOR_BB_INSNS_SAFE (body, insn, cur_insn)
+ if (!(GET_CODE (insn) == CODE_LABEL || NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK_P (insn)))
+ delete_insn (insn);
+ for (insn = seq; NEXT_INSN (insn); insn = NEXT_INSN (insn))
+ if (NOTE_P (insn))
+ emit_note_after ((enum insn_note)NOTE_KIND (insn), BB_END (body));
+ else if (DEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
+ emit_debug_insn_after (PATTERN (insn), BB_END (body));
+ else
+ emit_insn_after (PATTERN (insn), BB_END (body));
+
+ emit_jump_insn_after (PATTERN (insn), BB_END (body));
+ /* The transformation has succeeded, so now modify the "count"
+ (a.k.a. niter_expr) for the middle-end. Also set noloop_assumptions
+ to NULL to stop the middle-end from making assumptions about the
+ number of iterations. */
+ simple_loop_desc (body->loop_father)->niter_expr = vctp_reg;
+ simple_loop_desc (body->loop_father)->noloop_assumptions = NULL_RTX;
+ return GEN_INT (decrementnum);
}
#if CHECKING_P
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
index ee931ad6ebd..70fade0d0da 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
@@ -124,6 +124,11 @@
; and not all ARM insns do.
(define_attr "predicated" "yes,no" (const_string "no"))
+
+; An attribute that encodes the CODE_FOR_<insn> of the MVE VPT unpredicated
+; version of a VPT-predicated instruction. For unpredicated instructions
+; that are predicable, encode the same pattern's CODE_FOR_<insn> as a way to
+; encode that it is a predicable instruction.
(define_attr "mve_unpredicated_insn" "" (const_int 0))
; LENGTH of an instruction (in bytes)
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md b/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md
index 71e43539616..1401b59dc0b 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md
@@ -2660,6 +2660,9 @@
(define_int_attr mrrc [(VUNSPEC_MRRC "mrrc") (VUNSPEC_MRRC2 "mrrc2")])
(define_int_attr MRRC [(VUNSPEC_MRRC "MRRC") (VUNSPEC_MRRC2 "MRRC2")])
+(define_int_attr mode1 [(DLSTP8 "8") (DLSTP16 "16") (DLSTP32 "32")
+ (DLSTP64 "64")])
+
(define_int_attr opsuffix [(UNSPEC_DOT_S "s8")
(UNSPEC_DOT_U "u8")
(UNSPEC_DOT_US "s8")
@@ -2903,6 +2906,8 @@
(define_int_iterator VSHLCQ_M [VSHLCQ_M_S VSHLCQ_M_U])
(define_int_iterator VQSHLUQ_M_N [VQSHLUQ_M_N_S])
(define_int_iterator VQSHLUQ_N [VQSHLUQ_N_S])
+(define_int_iterator DLSTP [DLSTP8 DLSTP16 DLSTP32
+ DLSTP64])
;; Define iterators for VCMLA operations
(define_int_iterator VCMLA_OP [UNSPEC_VCMLA
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
index 87cbf6c1726..dc4b6301aaa 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
@@ -6997,7 +6997,7 @@
(set (reg:SI LR_REGNUM)
(plus:SI (reg:SI LR_REGNUM) (match_dup 0)))
(clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
- "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB && TARGET_HAVE_MVE && TARGET_THUMB2"
+ "TARGET_HAVE_MVE"
{
if (get_attr_length (insn) == 4)
return "letp\t%|lr, %l1";
@@ -7017,5 +7017,5 @@
(unspec:SI [(match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "r")]
DLSTP))
]
- "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB && TARGET_HAVE_MVE && TARGET_THUMB2"
+ "TARGET_HAVE_MVE"
"dlstp.<mode1>\t%|lr, %0")
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md b/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
index e1e013befa7..368d5138ca1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
@@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@
(use (match_operand 1 "" ""))] ; label
"TARGET_32BIT"
"
- {
+{
/* Currently SMS relies on the do-loop pattern to recognize loops
where (1) the control part consists of all insns defining and/or
using a certain 'count' register and (2) the loop count can be
@@ -1623,41 +1623,65 @@
Also used to implement the low over head loops feature, which is part of
the Armv8.1-M Mainline Low Overhead Branch (LOB) extension. */
- if (optimize > 0 && (flag_modulo_sched || TARGET_HAVE_LOB))
- {
- rtx s0;
- rtx bcomp;
- rtx loc_ref;
- rtx cc_reg;
- rtx insn;
- rtx cmp;
-
- if (GET_MODE (operands[0]) != SImode)
- FAIL;
-
- s0 = operands [0];
-
- /* Low over head loop instructions require the first operand to be LR. */
- if (TARGET_HAVE_LOB && arm_target_insn_ok_for_lob (operands [1]))
- s0 = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, LR_REGNUM);
-
- if (TARGET_THUMB2)
- insn = emit_insn (gen_thumb2_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0, GEN_INT (-1)));
- else
- insn = emit_insn (gen_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0, GEN_INT (-1)));
-
- cmp = XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0);
- cc_reg = SET_DEST (cmp);
- bcomp = gen_rtx_NE (VOIDmode, cc_reg, const0_rtx);
- loc_ref = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode, operands [1]);
- emit_jump_insn (gen_rtx_SET (pc_rtx,
- gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, bcomp,
- loc_ref, pc_rtx)));
- DONE;
- }
- else
- FAIL;
- }")
+ if (optimize > 0 && (flag_modulo_sched || TARGET_HAVE_LOB))
+ {
+ rtx s0;
+ rtx bcomp;
+ rtx loc_ref;
+ rtx cc_reg;
+ rtx insn;
+ rtx cmp;
+ rtx decrement_num;
+
+ if (GET_MODE (operands[0]) != SImode)
+ FAIL;
+
+ s0 = operands[0];
+
+ if (TARGET_HAVE_LOB && arm_target_bb_ok_for_lob (BLOCK_FOR_INSN (operands[1])))
+ {
+ s0 = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, LR_REGNUM);
+
+ /* If we have a compatibe MVE target, try and analyse the loop
+ contents to determine if we can use predicated dlstp/letp
+ looping. */
+ if (TARGET_HAVE_MVE
+ && (decrement_num = arm_attempt_dlstp_transform (operands[1]))
+ && (INTVAL (decrement_num) != 1))
+ {
+ insn = emit_insn
+ (gen_thumb2_addsi3_compare0
+ (s0, s0, GEN_INT ((-1) * (INTVAL (decrement_num)))));
+ cmp = XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0);
+ cc_reg = SET_DEST (cmp);
+ bcomp = gen_rtx_GE (VOIDmode, cc_reg, const0_rtx);
+ loc_ref = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode, operands[1]);
+ emit_jump_insn (gen_rtx_SET (pc_rtx,
+ gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, bcomp,
+ loc_ref, pc_rtx)));
+ DONE;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Otherwise, try standard decrement-by-one dls/le looping. */
+ if (TARGET_THUMB2)
+ insn = emit_insn (gen_thumb2_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0,
+ GEN_INT (-1)));
+ else
+ insn = emit_insn (gen_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0, GEN_INT (-1)));
+
+ cmp = XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0);
+ cc_reg = SET_DEST (cmp);
+ bcomp = gen_rtx_NE (VOIDmode, cc_reg, const0_rtx);
+ loc_ref = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode, operands[1]);
+ emit_jump_insn (gen_rtx_SET (pc_rtx,
+ gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, bcomp,
+ loc_ref, pc_rtx)));
+ DONE;
+ }
+ else
+ FAIL;
+}")
(define_insn "*clear_apsr"
[(unspec_volatile:SI [(const_int 0)] VUNSPEC_CLRM_APSR)
@@ -1755,7 +1779,37 @@
{
if (REGNO (operands[0]) == LR_REGNUM)
{
- emit_insn (gen_dls_insn (operands[0]));
+ /* Pick out the number by which we are decrementing the loop counter
+ in every iteration. If it's > 1, then use dlstp. */
+ int const_int_dec_num
+ = abs (INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (XVECEXP (PATTERN (operands[1]), 0, 1),
+ 1),
+ 1)));
+ switch (const_int_dec_num)
+ {
+ case 16:
+ emit_insn (gen_dlstp8_insn (operands[0]));
+ break;
+
+ case 8:
+ emit_insn (gen_dlstp16_insn (operands[0]));
+ break;
+
+ case 4:
+ emit_insn (gen_dlstp32_insn (operands[0]));
+ break;
+
+ case 2:
+ emit_insn (gen_dlstp64_insn (operands[0]));
+ break;
+
+ case 1:
+ emit_insn (gen_dls_insn (operands[0]));
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+ }
DONE;
}
else
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md b/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
index 6a5b1f8f623..7921bffc169 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
@@ -581,6 +581,10 @@
VADDLVQ_U
VCTP
VCTP_M
+ DLSTP8
+ DLSTP16
+ DLSTP32
+ DLSTP64
VPNOT
VCREATEQ_F
VCVTQ_N_TO_F_S
diff --git a/gcc/df-core.cc b/gcc/df-core.cc
index d4812b04a7c..4fcc14bf790 100644
--- a/gcc/df-core.cc
+++ b/gcc/df-core.cc
@@ -1964,6 +1964,21 @@ df_bb_regno_last_def_find (basic_block bb, unsigned int regno)
return NULL;
}
+/* Return the one and only def of REGNO within BB. If there is no def or
+ there are multiple defs, return NULL. */
+
+df_ref
+df_bb_regno_only_def_find (basic_block bb, unsigned int regno)
+{
+ df_ref temp = df_bb_regno_first_def_find (bb, regno);
+ if (!temp)
+ return NULL;
+ else if (temp == df_bb_regno_last_def_find (bb, regno))
+ return temp;
+ else
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/* Finds the reference corresponding to the definition of REG in INSN.
DF is the dataflow object. */
diff --git a/gcc/df.h b/gcc/df.h
index 402657a7076..98623637f9c 100644
--- a/gcc/df.h
+++ b/gcc/df.h
@@ -987,6 +987,7 @@ extern void df_check_cfg_clean (void);
#endif
extern df_ref df_bb_regno_first_def_find (basic_block, unsigned int);
extern df_ref df_bb_regno_last_def_find (basic_block, unsigned int);
+extern df_ref df_bb_regno_only_def_find (basic_block, unsigned int);
extern df_ref df_find_def (rtx_insn *, rtx);
extern bool df_reg_defined (rtx_insn *, rtx);
extern df_ref df_find_use (rtx_insn *, rtx);
diff --git a/gcc/loop-doloop.cc b/gcc/loop-doloop.cc
index 4feb0a25ab9..f6dbd0515de 100644
--- a/gcc/loop-doloop.cc
+++ b/gcc/loop-doloop.cc
@@ -85,29 +85,29 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx_insn *doloop_pat)
forms:
1) (parallel [(set (pc) (if_then_else (condition)
- (label_ref (label))
- (pc)))
- (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))
- (additional clobbers and uses)])
+ (label_ref (label))
+ (pc)))
+ (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -n)))
+ (additional clobbers and uses)])
The branch must be the first entry of the parallel (also required
by jump.cc), and the second entry of the parallel must be a set of
the loop counter register. Some targets (IA-64) wrap the set of
the loop counter in an if_then_else too.
- 2) (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1))
- (set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 0)
- (label_ref (label))
- (pc))).
+ 2) (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -n))
+ (set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 0)
+ (label_ref (label))
+ (pc))).
Some targets (ARM) do the comparison before the branch, as in the
following form:
- 3) (parallel [(set (cc) (compare ((plus (reg) (const_int -1), 0)))
- (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))])
- (set (pc) (if_then_else (cc == NE)
- (label_ref (label))
- (pc))) */
+ 3) (parallel [(set (cc) (compare ((plus (reg) (const_int -n), 0)))
+ (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -n)))])
+ (set (pc) (if_then_else (cc == NE)
+ (label_ref (label))
+ (pc))) */
pattern = PATTERN (doloop_pat);
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx_insn *doloop_pat)
|| GET_CODE (cmp_arg1) != PLUS)
return 0;
reg_orig = XEXP (cmp_arg1, 0);
- if (XEXP (cmp_arg1, 1) != GEN_INT (-1)
+ if (!CONST_INT_P (XEXP (cmp_arg1, 1))
|| !REG_P (reg_orig))
return 0;
cc_reg = SET_DEST (cmp_orig);
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx_insn *doloop_pat)
{
/* We expect the condition to be of the form (reg != 0) */
cond = XEXP (SET_SRC (cmp), 0);
- if (GET_CODE (cond) != NE || XEXP (cond, 1) != const0_rtx)
+ if ((GET_CODE (cond) != NE && GET_CODE (cond) != GE)
+ || XEXP (cond, 1) != const0_rtx)
return 0;
}
}
@@ -173,14 +174,14 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx_insn *doloop_pat)
if (! REG_P (reg))
return 0;
- /* Check if something = (plus (reg) (const_int -1)).
+ /* Check if something = (plus (reg) (const_int -n)).
On IA-64, this decrement is wrapped in an if_then_else. */
inc_src = SET_SRC (inc);
if (GET_CODE (inc_src) == IF_THEN_ELSE)
inc_src = XEXP (inc_src, 1);
if (GET_CODE (inc_src) != PLUS
|| XEXP (inc_src, 0) != reg
- || XEXP (inc_src, 1) != constm1_rtx)
+ || !CONST_INT_P (XEXP (inc_src, 1)))
return 0;
/* Check for (set (pc) (if_then_else (condition)
@@ -211,42 +212,49 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx_insn *doloop_pat)
|| (GET_CODE (XEXP (condition, 0)) == PLUS
&& XEXP (XEXP (condition, 0), 0) == reg))
{
- if (GET_CODE (pattern) != PARALLEL)
/* For the second form we expect:
- (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1))
- (set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 0)
- (label_ref (label))
- (pc))).
+ (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -n))
+ (set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 0)
+ (label_ref (label))
+ (pc))).
- is equivalent to the following:
+ If n == 1, that is equivalent to the following:
- (parallel [(set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 1)
- (label_ref (label))
- (pc)))
- (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))
- (additional clobbers and uses)])
+ (parallel [(set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 1)
+ (label_ref (label))
+ (pc)))
+ (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))
+ (additional clobbers and uses)])
- For the third form we expect:
+ For the third form we expect:
- (parallel [(set (cc) (compare ((plus (reg) (const_int -1)), 0))
- (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))])
- (set (pc) (if_then_else (cc == NE)
- (label_ref (label))
- (pc)))
+ (parallel [(set (cc) (compare ((plus (reg) (const_int -n)), 0))
+ (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -n)))])
+ (set (pc) (if_then_else (cc == NE)
+ (label_ref (label))
+ (pc)))
- which is equivalent to the following:
+ Which also for n == 1 is equivalent to the following:
- (parallel [(set (cc) (compare (reg, 1))
- (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))
- (set (pc) (if_then_else (NE == cc)
- (label_ref (label))
- (pc))))])
+ (parallel [(set (cc) (compare (reg, 1))
+ (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))
+ (set (pc) (if_then_else (NE == cc)
+ (label_ref (label))
+ (pc))))])
- So we return the second form instead for the two cases.
+ So we return the second form instead for the two cases.
+ For the "elementwise" form where the decrement number isn't -1,
+ the final value may be exceeded, so use GE instead of NE.
*/
- condition = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (NE, VOIDmode, inc_src, const1_rtx);
+ if (GET_CODE (pattern) != PARALLEL)
+ {
+ if (INTVAL (XEXP (inc_src, 1)) != -1)
+ condition = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (GE, VOIDmode, inc_src, const0_rtx);
+ else
+ condition = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (NE, VOIDmode, inc_src, const1_rtx);;
+ }
return condition;
}
@@ -685,17 +693,6 @@ doloop_optimize (class loop *loop)
return false;
}
- max_cost
- = COSTS_N_INSNS (param_max_iterations_computation_cost);
- if (set_src_cost (desc->niter_expr, mode, optimize_loop_for_speed_p (loop))
- > max_cost)
- {
- if (dump_file)
- fprintf (dump_file,
- "Doloop: number of iterations too costly to compute.\n");
- return false;
- }
-
if (desc->const_iter)
iterations = widest_int::from (rtx_mode_t (desc->niter_expr, mode),
UNSIGNED);
@@ -716,11 +713,24 @@ doloop_optimize (class loop *loop)
/* Generate looping insn. If the pattern FAILs then give up trying
to modify the loop since there is some aspect the back-end does
- not like. */
- count = copy_rtx (desc->niter_expr);
+ not like. If this succeeds, there is a chance that the loop
+ desc->niter_expr has been altered by the backend, so only extract
+ that data after the gen_doloop_end. */
start_label = block_label (desc->in_edge->dest);
doloop_reg = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
rtx_insn *doloop_seq = targetm.gen_doloop_end (doloop_reg, start_label);
+ count = copy_rtx (desc->niter_expr);
+
+ max_cost
+ = COSTS_N_INSNS (param_max_iterations_computation_cost);
+ if (set_src_cost (count, mode, optimize_loop_for_speed_p (loop))
+ > max_cost)
+ {
+ if (dump_file)
+ fprintf (dump_file,
+ "Doloop: number of iterations too costly to compute.\n");
+ return false;
+ }
word_mode_size = GET_MODE_PRECISION (word_mode);
word_mode_max = (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << (word_mode_size - 1) << 1) - 1;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h
index feaae7cc899..3941fe7a8b6 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h
@@ -1,15 +1,131 @@
#include <string.h>
-
+#include <stdint.h>
/* Common code for lob tests. */
#define NO_LOB asm volatile ("@ clobber lr" : : : "lr" )
-#define N 10000
+#define N 100
+
+static void
+reset_data (int *a, int *b, int *c, int x)
+{
+ memset (a, -1, x * sizeof (*a));
+ memset (b, -1, x * sizeof (*b));
+ memset (c, 0, x * sizeof (*c));
+}
+
+static void
+reset_data8 (int8_t *a, int8_t *b, int8_t *c, int x)
+{
+ memset (a, -1, x * sizeof (*a));
+ memset (b, -1, x * sizeof (*b));
+ memset (c, 0, x * sizeof (*c));
+}
+
+static void
+reset_data16 (int16_t *a, int16_t *b, int16_t *c, int x)
+{
+ memset (a, -1, x * sizeof (*a));
+ memset (b, -1, x * sizeof (*b));
+ memset (c, 0, x * sizeof (*c));
+}
+
+static void
+reset_data32 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int x)
+{
+ memset (a, -1, x * sizeof (*a));
+ memset (b, -1, x * sizeof (*b));
+ memset (c, 0, x * sizeof (*c));
+}
+
+static void
+reset_data64 (int64_t *a, int64_t *c, int x)
+{
+ memset (a, -1, x * sizeof (*a));
+ memset (c, 0, x * sizeof (*c));
+}
+
+static void
+check_plus (int *a, int *b, int *c, int x)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ {
+ NO_LOB;
+ if (i < x)
+ {
+ if (c[i] != (a[i] + b[i])) abort ();
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (c[i] != 0) abort ();
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void
+check_plus8 (int8_t *a, int8_t *b, int8_t *c, int x)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ {
+ NO_LOB;
+ if (i < x)
+ {
+ if (c[i] != (a[i] + b[i])) abort ();
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (c[i] != 0) abort ();
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void
+check_plus16 (int16_t *a, int16_t *b, int16_t *c, int x)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ {
+ NO_LOB;
+ if (i < x)
+ {
+ if (c[i] != (a[i] + b[i])) abort ();
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (c[i] != 0) abort ();
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void
+check_plus32 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int x)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ {
+ NO_LOB;
+ if (i < x)
+ {
+ if (c[i] != (a[i] + b[i])) abort ();
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (c[i] != 0) abort ();
+ }
+ }
+}
static void
-reset_data (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+check_memcpy64 (int64_t *a, int64_t *c, int x)
{
- memset (a, -1, N * sizeof (*a));
- memset (b, -1, N * sizeof (*b));
- memset (c, -1, N * sizeof (*c));
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ {
+ NO_LOB;
+ if (i < x)
+ {
+ if (c[i] != a[i]) abort ();
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (c[i] != 0) abort ();
+ }
+ }
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
index ba5c82cd55c..c8ce653a5c3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
@@ -54,29 +54,18 @@ loop3 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
} while (i < N);
}
-void
-check (int *a, int *b, int *c)
-{
- for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
- {
- NO_LOB;
- if (c[i] != a[i] + b[i])
- abort ();
- }
-}
-
int
main (void)
{
- reset_data (a, b, c);
+ reset_data (a, b, c, N);
loop1 (a, b ,c);
- check (a, b ,c);
- reset_data (a, b, c);
+ check_plus (a, b, c, N);
+ reset_data (a, b, c, N);
loop2 (a, b ,c);
- check (a, b ,c);
- reset_data (a, b, c);
+ check_plus (a, b, c, N);
+ reset_data (a, b, c, N);
loop3 (a, b ,c);
- check (a, b ,c);
+ check_plus (a, b, c, N);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
index 17b6124295e..4fe116e2c2b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ check (void)
int
main (void)
{
- reset_data (a1, b1, c1);
- reset_data (a2, b2, c2);
+ reset_data (a1, b1, c1, N);
+ reset_data (a2, b2, c2, N);
loop1 (a1, b1, c1);
ref1 (a2, b2, c2);
check ();
- reset_data (a1, b1, c1);
- reset_data (a2, b2, c2);
+ reset_data (a1, b1, c1, N);
+ reset_data (a2, b2, c2, N);
loop2 (a1, b1, c1);
ref2 (a2, b2, c2);
check ();
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5ddd994e53d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,561 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target { arm*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -save-temps" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
+
+#include <arm_mve.h>
+
+#define IMM 5
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY(BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, TYPE, SIGN, NAME, PRED) \
+void test_##NAME##PRED##_##SIGN##BITS (TYPE##BITS##_t *a, TYPE##BITS##_t *b, TYPE##BITS##_t *c, int n) \
+{ \
+ while (n > 0) \
+ { \
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp##BITS##q (n); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t va = vldr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_z_##SIGN##BITS (a, p); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t vb = vldr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_z_##SIGN##BITS (b, p); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t vc = NAME##PRED##_##SIGN##BITS (va, vb, p); \
+ vstr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_p_##SIGN##BITS (c, vc, p); \
+ c += LANES; \
+ a += LANES; \
+ b += LANES; \
+ n -= LANES; \
+ } \
+}
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY(BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY (BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, int, s, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY (BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, uint, u, NAME, PRED)
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY(NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY (8, 16, b, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY (16, 8, h, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY (32, 4, w, NAME, PRED)
+
+
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY (vaddq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY (vmulq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY (vsubq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY (vhaddq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY (vorrq, _x)
+
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_M(BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, TYPE, SIGN, NAME, PRED) \
+void test_##NAME##PRED##_##SIGN##BITS (TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t __inactive, TYPE##BITS##_t *a, TYPE##BITS##_t *b, TYPE##BITS##_t *c, int n) \
+{ \
+ while (n > 0) \
+ { \
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp##BITS##q (n); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t va = vldr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_z_##SIGN##BITS (a, p); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t vb = vldr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_z_##SIGN##BITS (b, p); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t vc = NAME##PRED##_##SIGN##BITS (__inactive, va, vb, p); \
+ vstr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_p_##SIGN##BITS (c, vc, p); \
+ c += LANES; \
+ a += LANES; \
+ b += LANES; \
+ n -= LANES; \
+ } \
+}
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M(BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_M (BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, int, s, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_M (BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, uint, u, NAME, PRED)
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M(NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M (8, 16, b, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M (16, 8, h, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M (32, 4, w, NAME, PRED)
+
+
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M (vaddq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M (vmulq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M (vsubq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M (vhaddq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M (vorrq, _m)
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_N(BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, TYPE, SIGN, NAME, PRED) \
+void test_##NAME##PRED##_n_##SIGN##BITS (TYPE##BITS##_t *a, TYPE##BITS##_t *c, int n) \
+{ \
+ while (n > 0) \
+ { \
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp##BITS##q (n); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t va = vldr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_z_##SIGN##BITS (a, p); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t vc = NAME##PRED##_n_##SIGN##BITS (va, IMM, p); \
+ vstr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_p_##SIGN##BITS (c, vc, p); \
+ c += LANES; \
+ a += LANES; \
+ n -= LANES; \
+ } \
+}
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N(BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_N (BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, int, s, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_N (BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, uint, u, NAME, PRED)
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N(NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (8, 16, b, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (16, 8, h, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (32, 4, w, NAME, PRED)
+
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (vaddq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (vmulq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (vsubq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (vhaddq, _x)
+
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (vbrsrq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (vshlq, _x)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_N (vshrq, _x)
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_M_N(BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, TYPE, SIGN, NAME, PRED) \
+void test_##NAME##PRED##_n_##SIGN##BITS (TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t __inactive, TYPE##BITS##_t *a, TYPE##BITS##_t *c, int n) \
+{ \
+ while (n > 0) \
+ { \
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp##BITS##q (n); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t va = vldr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_z_##SIGN##BITS (a, p); \
+ TYPE##BITS##x##LANES##_t vc = NAME##PRED##_n_##SIGN##BITS (__inactive, va, IMM, p); \
+ vstr##LDRSTRYTPE##q_p_##SIGN##BITS (c, vc, p); \
+ c += LANES; \
+ a += LANES; \
+ n -= LANES; \
+ } \
+}
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N(BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_M_N (BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, int, s, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_TERNARY_M_N (BITS, LANES, LDRSTRYTPE, uint, u, NAME, PRED)
+
+#define TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N(NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (8, 16, b, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (16, 8, h, NAME, PRED) \
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (32, 4, w, NAME, PRED)
+
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (vaddq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (vmulq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (vsubq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (vhaddq, _m)
+
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (vbrsrq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (vshlq, _m)
+TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY_M_N (vshrq, _m)
+
+/* Now test some more configurations. */
+
+/* Using a >=1 condition. */
+void test1 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n >= 1)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c+=4;
+ a+=4;
+ b+=4;
+ n-=4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Test a for loop format of decrementing to zero */
+int32_t a[] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7};
+void test2 (int32_t *b, int num_elems)
+{
+ for (int i = num_elems; i > 0; i-= 4)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (i);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (&(a[i]), p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (b + i, va, p);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Iteration counter counting up to num_iter. */
+void test3 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int num_iter = (n + 15)/16;
+ for (int i = 0; i < num_iter; i++)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_x_u8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_p_u8 (c, vc, p);
+ n-=16;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Iteration counter counting down from num_iter. */
+void test4 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int num_iter = (n + 15)/16;
+ for (int i = num_iter; i > 0; i--)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_x_u8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_p_u8 (c, vc, p);
+ n-=16;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using an unpredicated arithmetic instruction within the loop. */
+void test5 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, uint8_t *d, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_u8 (b);
+ /* Is affected by implicit predication, because vb also
+ came from an unpredicated load, but there is no functional
+ problem, because the result is used in a predicated store. */
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_u8 (va, vb);
+ uint8x16_t vd = vaddq_x_u8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_p_u8 (c, vc, p);
+ vstrbq_p_u8 (d, vd, p);
+ n-=16;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using a different VPR value for one instruction in the loop. */
+void test6 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n, mve_pred16_t p1)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p1);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Generating and using another VPR value in the loop, with a vctp.
+ The doloop logic will always try to do the transform on the first
+ vctp it encounters, so this is still expected to work. */
+void test7 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n, int g)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ mve_pred16_t p1 = vctp32q (g);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p1);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Generating and using a different VPR value in the loop, with a vctp,
+ but this time the p1 will also change in every loop (still fine) */
+void test8 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n, int g)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ mve_pred16_t p1 = vctp32q (g);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p1);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ g++;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Generating and using a different VPR value in the loop, with a vctp_m
+ that is independent of the loop vctp VPR. */
+void test9 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n, mve_pred16_t p1)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ mve_pred16_t p2 = vctp32q_m (n, p1);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p1);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p2);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Generating and using a different VPR value in the loop,
+ with a vctp_m that is tied to the base vctp VPR. This
+ is still fine, because the vctp_m will be transformed
+ into a vctp and be implicitly predicated. */
+void test10 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ mve_pred16_t p1 = vctp32q_m (n, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p1);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p1);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Generating and using a different VPR value in the loop, with a vcmp. */
+void test11 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ mve_pred16_t p1 = vcmpeqq_s32 (va, vb);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p1);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Generating and using a different VPR value in the loop, with a vcmp_m. */
+void test12 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n, mve_pred16_t p1)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ mve_pred16_t p2 = vcmpeqq_m_s32 (va, vb, p1);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p2);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Generating and using a different VPR value in the loop, with a vcmp_m
+ that is tied to the base vctp VPR (same as above, this will be turned
+ into a vcmp and be implicitly predicated). */
+void test13 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n, mve_pred16_t p1)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ mve_pred16_t p2 = vcmpeqq_m_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p2);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using an unpredicated op with a scalar output, where the result is valid
+ outside the bb. This is valid, because all the inputs to the unpredicated
+ op are correctly predicated. */
+uint8_t test14 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n, uint8x16_t vx)
+{
+ uint8_t sum = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_m_u8 (vx, va, vb, p);
+ sum += vaddvq_u8 (vc);
+ a += 16;
+ b += 16;
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+ return sum;
+}
+
+/* Same as above, but with another scalar op between the unpredicated op and
+ the scalar op outside the loop. */
+uint8_t test15 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n, uint8x16_t vx, int g)
+{
+ uint8_t sum = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_m_u8 (vx, va, vb, p);
+ sum += vaddvq_u8 (vc);
+ sum += g;
+ a += 16;
+ b += 16;
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+ return sum;
+}
+
+/* Using an unpredicated vcmp to generate a new predicate value in the
+ loop and then using it in a predicated store insn. */
+void test16 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_s32 (b);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ mve_pred16_t p1 = vcmpeqq_s32 (va, vc);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p1);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using a predicated vcmp to generate a new predicate value in the
+ loop and then using it in a predicated store insn. */
+void test17 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_s32 (va, vb);
+ mve_pred16_t p1 = vcmpeqq_m_s32 (va, vc, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p1);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using an across-vector unpredicated instruction in a valid way.
+ This tests that "vc" has correctly masked the risky "vb". */
+uint16_t test18 (uint16_t *a, uint16_t *b, uint16_t *c, int n)
+{
+ uint16x8_t vb = vldrhq_u16 (b);
+ uint16_t res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp16q (n);
+ uint16x8_t va = vldrhq_z_u16 (a, p);
+ uint16x8_t vc = vaddq_x_u16 (va, vb, p);
+ res = vaddvq_u16 (vc);
+ c += 8;
+ a += 8;
+ b += 8;
+ n -= 8;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+/* Using an across-vector unpredicated instruction with a scalar from outside the loop. */
+uint16_t test19 (uint16_t *a, uint16_t *b, uint16_t *c, int n)
+{
+ uint16x8_t vb = vldrhq_u16 (b);
+ uint16_t res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp16q (n);
+ uint16x8_t va = vldrhq_z_u16 (a, p);
+ uint16x8_t vc = vaddq_x_u16 (va, vb, p);
+ res = vaddvaq_u16 (res, vc);
+ c += 8;
+ a += 8;
+ b += 8;
+ n -= 8;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+/* Using an across-vector predicated instruction in a valid way. */
+uint16_t test20 (uint16_t *a, uint16_t *b, uint16_t *c, int n)
+{
+ uint16_t res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp16q (n);
+ uint16x8_t vb = vldrhq_u16 (b);
+ uint16x8_t va = vldrhq_z_u16 (a, p);
+ res = vaddvaq_p_u16 (res, vb, p);
+ c += 8;
+ a += 8;
+ b += 8;
+ n -= 8;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+/* Using an across-vector predicated instruction in a valid way. */
+uint16_t test21 (uint16_t *a, uint16_t *b, uint16_t *c, int n)
+{
+ uint16_t res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp16q (n);
+ uint16x8_t vb = vldrhq_u16 (b);
+ uint16x8_t va = vldrhq_z_u16 (a, p);
+ res++;
+ res = vaddvaq_p_u16 (res, vb, p);
+ c += 8;
+ a += 8;
+ b += 8;
+ n -= 8;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+int test22 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ res = vmaxvq (res, va);
+ n-=16;
+ a+=16;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+int test23 (int8_t *a, int8_t *b, int8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ int8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_s8 (a, p);
+ res = vmaxavq (res, va);
+ n-=16;
+ a+=16;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+/* The final number of DLSTPs currently is calculated by the number of
+ `TEST_COMPILE_IN_DLSTP_INTBITS_SIGNED_UNSIGNED_TERNARY.*` macros * 6 + 23. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tdlstp} 167 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tletp} 167 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0cdffb312b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/* { dg-do run { target { arm*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -save-temps" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
+
+#include <arm_mve.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "../lob.h"
+
+void __attribute__ ((noinline)) test (int16_t *a, int16_t *b, int16_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp16q (n);
+ int16x8_t va = vldrhq_z_s16 (a, p);
+ int16x8_t vb = vldrhq_z_s16 (b, p);
+ int16x8_t vc = vaddq_x_s16 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrhq_p_s16 (c, vc, p);
+ c+=8;
+ a+=8;
+ b+=8;
+ n-=8;
+ }
+}
+
+int main ()
+{
+ int i;
+ int16_t temp1[N];
+ int16_t temp2[N];
+ int16_t temp3[N];
+ reset_data16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 0);
+ check_plus16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 0);
+
+ reset_data16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 1);
+ check_plus16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 1);
+
+ reset_data16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 7);
+ check_plus16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 7);
+
+ reset_data16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 8);
+ check_plus16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 8);
+
+ reset_data16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 9);
+ check_plus16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 9);
+
+ reset_data16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 16);
+ check_plus16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 16);
+
+ reset_data16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 17);
+ check_plus16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 17);
+
+ reset_data16 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tdlstp.16} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tletp} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tvctp" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tvpst" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "p0" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7ff789d7650
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/* { dg-do run { target { arm*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -save-temps" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
+
+#include <arm_mve.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "../lob.h"
+
+void __attribute__ ((noinline)) test (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c+=4;
+ a+=4;
+ b+=4;
+ n-=4;
+ }
+}
+
+int main ()
+{
+ int i;
+ int32_t temp1[N];
+ int32_t temp2[N];
+ int32_t temp3[N];
+ reset_data32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 0);
+ check_plus32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 0);
+
+ reset_data32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 1);
+ check_plus32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 1);
+
+ reset_data32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 3);
+ check_plus32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 3);
+
+ reset_data32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 4);
+ check_plus32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 4);
+
+ reset_data32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 5);
+ check_plus32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 5);
+
+ reset_data32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 8);
+ check_plus32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 8);
+
+ reset_data32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 9);
+ check_plus32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 9);
+
+ reset_data32 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tdlstp.32} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tletp} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tvctp" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tvpst" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "p0" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8065bd02469
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/* { dg-do run { target { arm*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -save-temps" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
+
+#include <arm_mve.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "../lob.h"
+
+void __attribute__ ((noinline)) test (int64_t *a, int64_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp64q (n);
+ int64x2_t va = vldrdq_gather_offset_z_s64 (a, vcreateq_u64 (0, 8), p);
+ vstrdq_scatter_offset_p_s64 (c, vcreateq_u64 (0, 8), va, p);
+ c+=2;
+ a+=2;
+ n-=2;
+ }
+}
+
+int main ()
+{
+ int i;
+ int64_t temp1[N];
+ int64_t temp3[N];
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp3, 0);
+ check_memcpy64 (temp1, temp3, 0);
+
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp3, 1);
+ check_memcpy64 (temp1, temp3, 1);
+
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp3, 2);
+ check_memcpy64 (temp1, temp3, 2);
+
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp3, 3);
+ check_memcpy64 (temp1, temp3, 3);
+
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp3, 4);
+ check_memcpy64 (temp1, temp3, 4);
+
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp3, 5);
+ check_memcpy64 (temp1, temp3, 5);
+
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp3, 6);
+ check_memcpy64 (temp1, temp3, 6);
+
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp3, 7);
+ check_memcpy64 (temp1, temp3, 7);
+
+ reset_data64 (temp1, temp3, N);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tdlstp.64} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tletp} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tvctp" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tvpst" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "p0" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..552781001e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/* { dg-do run { target { arm*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -save-temps" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
+
+#include <arm_mve.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "../lob.h"
+
+void __attribute__ ((noinline)) test (int8_t *a, int8_t *b, int8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ int8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_s8 (a, p);
+ int8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_s8 (b, p);
+ int8x16_t vc = vaddq_x_s8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_p_s8 (c, vc, p);
+ c+=16;
+ a+=16;
+ b+=16;
+ n-=16;
+ }
+}
+
+int main ()
+{
+ int i;
+ int8_t temp1[N];
+ int8_t temp2[N];
+ int8_t temp3[N];
+ reset_data8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 0);
+ check_plus8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 0);
+
+ reset_data8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 1);
+ check_plus8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 1);
+
+ reset_data8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 15);
+ check_plus8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 15);
+
+ reset_data8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 16);
+ check_plus8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 16);
+
+ reset_data8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 17);
+ check_plus8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 17);
+
+ reset_data8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 32);
+ check_plus8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 32);
+
+ reset_data8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+ test (temp1, temp2, temp3, 33);
+ check_plus8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, 33);
+
+ reset_data8 (temp1, temp2, temp3, N);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tdlstp.8} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tletp} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tvctp" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tvpst" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "p0" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c1c40c2fea7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target { arm*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -save-temps" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
+
+#include <arm_mve.h>
+
+/* Terminating on a non-zero number of elements. */
+void test0 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 1)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_x_u8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_p_u8 (c, vc, p);
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Terminating on n >= 0. */
+void test1 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n >= 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_x_u8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_p_u8 (c, vc, p);
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Similar, terminating on a non-zero number of elements, but in a for loop
+ format. */
+int32_t a[] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7};
+void test2 (int32_t *b, int num_elems)
+{
+ for (int i = num_elems; i >= 2; i-= 4)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (i);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (&(a[i]), p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (b + i, va, p);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Iteration counter counting up to num_iter, with a non-zero starting num. */
+void test3 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int num_iter = (n + 15)/16;
+ for (int i = 1; i < num_iter; i++)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_x_u8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_p_u8 (c, vc, p);
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Iteration counter counting up to num_iter, with a larger increment */
+void test4 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int num_iter = (n + 15)/16;
+ for (int i = 0; i < num_iter; i+=2)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_x_u8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_p_u8 (c, vc, p);
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using an unpredicated store instruction within the loop. */
+void test5 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, uint8_t *d, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_u8 (va, vb);
+ uint8x16_t vd = vaddq_x_u8 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrbq_u8 (d, vd);
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using an unpredicated store outside the loop. */
+void test6 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n, uint8x16_t vx)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_z_u8 (b, p);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_m_u8 (vx, va, vb, p);
+ vx = vaddq_u8 (vx, vc);
+ a += 16;
+ b += 16;
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+ vstrbq_u8 (c, vx);
+}
+
+/* Using a VPR that gets modified within the loop. */
+void test9 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ p++;
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using a VPR that gets re-generated within the loop. */
+void test10 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using vctp32q_m instead of vctp32q. */
+void test11 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32_t *c, int n, mve_pred16_t p0)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q_m (n, p0);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_z_s32 (a, p);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_x_s32 (va, vb, p);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using an unpredicated op with a scalar output, where the result is valid
+ outside the bb. This is invalid, because one of the inputs to the
+ unpredicated op is also unpredicated. */
+uint8_t test12 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n, uint8x16_t vx)
+{
+ uint8_t sum = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ uint8x16_t vb = vldrbq_u8 (b);
+ uint8x16_t vc = vaddq_u8 (va, vb);
+ sum += vaddvq_u8 (vc);
+ a += 16;
+ b += 16;
+ n -= 16;
+ }
+ return sum;
+}
+
+/* Using an unpredicated vcmp to generate a new predicate value in the
+ loop and then using that VPR to predicate a store insn. */
+void test13 (int32_t *a, int32_t *b, int32x4_t vc, int32_t *c, int n)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp32q (n);
+ int32x4_t va = vldrwq_s32 (a);
+ int32x4_t vb = vldrwq_z_s32 (b, p);
+ int32x4_t vc = vaddq_s32 (va, vb);
+ mve_pred16_t p1 = vcmpeqq_s32 (va, vc);
+ vstrwq_p_s32 (c, vc, p1);
+ c += 4;
+ a += 4;
+ b += 4;
+ n -= 4;
+ }
+}
+
+/* Using an across-vector unpredicated instruction. "vb" is the risk. */
+uint16_t test14 (uint16_t *a, uint16_t *b, uint16_t *c, int n)
+{
+ uint16x8_t vb = vldrhq_u16 (b);
+ uint16_t res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp16q (n);
+ uint16x8_t va = vldrhq_z_u16 (a, p);
+ vb = vaddq_u16 (va, vb);
+ res = vaddvq_u16 (vb);
+ c += 8;
+ a += 8;
+ b += 8;
+ n -= 8;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+/* Using an across-vector unpredicated instruction. "vc" is the risk. */
+uint16_t test15 (uint16_t *a, uint16_t *b, uint16_t *c, int n)
+{
+ uint16x8_t vb = vldrhq_u16 (b);
+ uint16_t res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp16q (n);
+ uint16x8_t va = vldrhq_z_u16 (a, p);
+ uint16x8_t vc = vaddq_u16 (va, vb);
+ res = vaddvaq_u16 (res, vc);
+ c += 8;
+ a += 8;
+ b += 8;
+ n -= 8;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+uint16_t test16 (uint16_t *a, uint16_t *b, uint16_t *c, int n)
+{
+ uint16_t res =0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp16q (n);
+ uint16x8_t vb = vldrhq_u16 (b);
+ uint16x8_t va = vldrhq_z_u16 (a, p);
+ res = vaddvaq_u16 (res, vb);
+ res = vaddvaq_p_u16 (res, va, p);
+ c += 8;
+ a += 8;
+ b += 8;
+ n -= 8;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+int test17 (int8_t *a, int8_t *b, int8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ int8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_s8 (a, p);
+ res = vmaxvq (res, va);
+ n-=16;
+ a+=16;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+
+
+int test18 (int8_t *a, int8_t *b, int8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ int8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_s8 (a, p);
+ res = vminvq (res, va);
+ n-=16;
+ a+=16;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+int test19 (int8_t *a, int8_t *b, int8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ int8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_s8 (a, p);
+ res = vminavq (res, va);
+ n-=16;
+ a+=16;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+int test20 (uint8_t *a, uint8_t *b, uint8_t *c, int n)
+{
+ int res = 0;
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ res = vminvq (res, va);
+ n-=16;
+ a+=16;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+uint8x16_t test21 (uint8_t *a, uint32_t *b, int n, uint8x16_t res)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ uint8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_u8 (a, p);
+ res = vshlcq_u8 (va, b, 1);
+ n-=16;
+ a+=16;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+
+int8x16_t test22 (int8_t *a, int32_t *b, int n, int8x16_t res)
+{
+ while (n > 0)
+ {
+ mve_pred16_t p = vctp8q (n);
+ int8x16_t va = vldrbq_z_s8 (a, p);
+ res = vshlcq_s8 (va, b, 1);
+ n-=16;
+ a+=16;
+ }
+ return res;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tdlstp" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tletp" } } */
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-17 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-17 10:31 Stamatis Markianos-Wright [this message]
2023-09-06 17:19 ` [PING][PATCH " Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-09-14 12:10 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-09-28 12:51 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-10-11 11:34 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-10-23 10:16 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-10-24 15:11 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-06 11:03 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-11-06 11:24 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-06 17:29 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-11-10 12:41 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-11-16 11:36 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-11-27 12:47 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-11-30 12:55 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-12-07 18:08 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-12-09 18:31 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-12-12 17:56 ` Richard Earnshaw
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-18 11:53 [PATCH 0/2] " Andre Vieira
2023-12-18 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Andre Vieira
2023-12-20 16:54 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-11-06 11:20 Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-06-15 11:47 Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-06-22 15:54 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-07-05 16:11 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-06-23 10:23 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-07-05 16:13 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-06-23 16:25 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-07-05 16:41 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2022-11-11 17:40 Stam Markianos-Wright
2022-11-15 15:51 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2022-11-28 12:13 ` Stam Markianos-Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=949f5dd0-cdf0-715a-f04c-3de80c9b974f@arm.com \
--to=stam.markianos-wright@arm.com \
--cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).