public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>,
	"Richard Biener" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	"Jakub Jelinek" <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flag_complex_method: support optimize attribute
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 08:45:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <951423c7-bf38-a710-a384-8c26c7494670@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce8704be-88d5-ff66-5d3f-71894f23b470@suse.cz>



On 9/7/2021 3:42 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 9/6/21 14:16, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:46 PM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>> --- a/gcc/opts.c
>>>> +++ b/gcc/opts.c
>>>> @@ -1323,6 +1323,14 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, 
>>>> struct gcc_options *opts_set,
>>>>         = (opts->x_flag_unroll_loops
>>>>            || opts->x_flag_peel_loops
>>>>            || opts->x_optimize >= 3);
>>>> +
>>>> +  /* With -fcx-limited-range, we do cheap and quick complex 
>>>> arithmetic.  */
>>>> +  if (opts->x_flag_cx_limited_range)
>>>> +    flag_complex_method = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +  /* With -fcx-fortran-rules, we do something in-between cheap and 
>>>> C99.  */
>>>> +  if (opts->x_flag_cx_fortran_rules)
>>>> +    flag_complex_method = 1;
>>>
>>> That should then be opts->x_flag_complex_method instead of 
>>> flag_complex_method.
>>>
>>> Ok with that change.
>>
>> But the C/C++ langhooks also set flag_complex_method so I fail to see 
>> how
>> this helps?  As said I was referring to -fcx-limited-range on the 
>> command-line
>> and -fno-cx-limited-range in the optimize node to undo this which should
>> get you the langhook setting of flag_complex_method = 2.
>
> You are right, it's even more complicated as -fno-cx-limited-range is 
> target specific.
> Option handling has been introducing surprises every time ...
>
> The following tested patch should handle it.
>
> Ready to be installed?
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
>>
>>> Note, I think we want to do much more in finish_options and less in
>>> process_options, anything that is about Optimization options rather 
>>> than
>>> just the global ones.  Though one needs to be careful with the cases 
>>> where
>>> the code diagnoses something.
>>>
>>>          Jakub
>>>
>
> 0001-flag_complex_method-support-optimize-attribute.patch
>
>  From e88ae14be7c5609a969897b5d09f40709fea8a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:53:00 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] flag_complex_method: support optimize attribute
>
> gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* c-opts.c (c_common_init_options_struct): Set also
> 	  x_flag_default_complex_method.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* common.opt: Add new variable flag_default_complex_method.
> 	* opts.c (finish_options): Handle flags related to
> 	  x_flag_complex_method.
> 	* toplev.c (process_options): Remove option handling related
> 	to flag_complex_method.
>
> gcc/go/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* go-lang.c (go_langhook_init_options_struct): Set also
> 	  x_flag_default_complex_method.
>
> gcc/lto/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* lto-lang.c (lto_init_options_struct): Set also
> 	  x_flag_default_complex_method.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method-2.c: New test.
> 	* gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method.c: New test.
OK
jeff


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-19 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-23 11:47 [PATCH] Optimize macro: make it more predictable Martin Liška
2020-11-03 13:27 ` Richard Biener
2020-11-03 13:34   ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-11-03 13:40     ` Richard Biener
2020-11-09 10:35     ` Martin Liška
2020-11-26 13:56       ` Martin Liška
2020-12-07 11:03         ` Martin Liška
2021-01-11 13:10           ` Martin Liška
2020-11-09 10:27   ` Martin Liška
2020-11-06 17:34 ` Jeff Law
2020-11-09 10:36   ` Martin Liška
2021-07-01 13:13 ` Martin Liška
2021-08-10 15:52   ` Martin Liška
2021-08-24 11:06     ` Martin Liška
2021-08-24 12:13   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-24 13:04     ` Martin Liška
2021-08-26 11:04       ` Richard Biener
2021-08-26 12:39         ` Martin Liška
2021-08-26 13:20           ` Richard Biener
2021-08-27  8:35           ` Martin Liška
2021-08-27  9:05             ` Richard Biener
2021-09-13 13:52               ` Martin Liška
2021-09-19  5:46                 ` Jeff Law
2021-09-06 11:37         ` [PATCH] flag_complex_method: support optimize attribute Martin Liška
2021-09-06 11:46           ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-09-06 12:16             ` Richard Biener
2021-09-06 12:24               ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-09-07  9:42               ` Martin Liška
2021-09-13 13:32                 ` Martin Liška
2021-09-19 14:45                 ` Jeff Law [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=951423c7-bf38-a710-a384-8c26c7494670@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).