From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21012 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2017 10:52:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21002 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2017 10:52:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=emphasize, sentence X-HELO: mail-pf0-f177.google.com Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-pf0-f177.google.com) (209.85.192.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:52:37 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 189so13170789pfu.3 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 02:52:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=XBqUT7J/1XXsSoe2NIEA61xS8XJHaGSlbAxxXF12lvY=; b=Ga/veUueSfzXHhcZttLhvGsoCbMDYPGmBeadnq9MeypxRmvZDeTrFAMpI9xB+7ehll zIE/wpq+qGps8dHZ56Pbapd7BveTvc303XcvdwOW0aNfn6rxqP6xw3KE5lj4VT5eoQmi 41NYb2gMzyImkavRtT1Pj0hOockl3bmX7A9st4Vg8+bDCdLelG7M84PCXOFSp3aASClW kmV3EA1j8Xbl3Inig3cAUUK5nc6ZNAL+I8cShXcDrKMseDvHeR7BQvl3Y3PpQijur6A7 +GyyaaJMOipG6W04rt4T8SoLAsE/nIcGgKDCSJvtnJSIdn1uFzRg7vKPFZbxDoHFPOa8 0d8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m9S9UXLNfz808cacar6YtTePhROqZ/tgaHZYHAaQKLSr1CABE0nux+bGAkn7fXlw== X-Received: by 10.98.147.78 with SMTP id b75mr8640322pfe.128.1487328755416; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 02:52:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:e68:4074:b998:f64d:30ff:fe63:5a5a? ([2001:e68:4074:b998:f64d:30ff:fe63:5a5a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u78sm18807695pfa.101.2017.02.17.02.52.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Feb 2017 02:52:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH, GCC/x86 mingw32] Add configure option to force wildcard behavior on Windows To: Thomas Preudhomme , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <3c3cd900-7d38-a66d-d306-12c968d26f0b@gmail.com> <35f8542e-df08-62ac-da0e-824a974b96e6@foss.arm.com> <7aaf616d-2e0a-cf68-3e4b-0c48b6e16d00@foss.arm.com> From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> Message-ID: <97780aa1-62c2-9471-a9f7-fce968f94fe3@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oHNHQpqiAPH805init3A5CkhKqkJ9U9CW" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg01102.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --oHNHQpqiAPH805init3A5CkhKqkJ9U9CW Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bfrmt64sv8Uoc5sqWeDWOtFRCoQ2c48oD" From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> To: Thomas Preudhomme , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Message-ID: <97780aa1-62c2-9471-a9f7-fce968f94fe3@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH, GCC/x86 mingw32] Add configure option to force wildcard behavior on Windows References: <3c3cd900-7d38-a66d-d306-12c968d26f0b@gmail.com> <35f8542e-df08-62ac-da0e-824a974b96e6@foss.arm.com> <7aaf616d-2e0a-cf68-3e4b-0c48b6e16d00@foss.arm.com> In-Reply-To: --bfrmt64sv8Uoc5sqWeDWOtFRCoQ2c48oD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 741 On 02/14/2017 10:42 AM, JonY wrote: > On 02/14/2017 09:32 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: >>> >>> Looks good, be sure to emphasize this option affects mingw hosted GCC >>> only, not the compiler output. >> >> I think that should be pretty clear in the latest version of the patch, >> doc/install.texi contains: >> >> "Note that this option only affects wildcard expansion for GCC itself.=20 >> It does >> not affect wildcard expansion of executables built by the resulting GCC." >> >> If you think a part of that sentence is still confusing please let me >> know and I'll improve it. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Thomas >> >=20 > Yes, that should be good, no more objections. >=20 >=20 Before I forget, please also provide a changelog, thanks. --bfrmt64sv8Uoc5sqWeDWOtFRCoQ2c48oD-- --oHNHQpqiAPH805init3A5CkhKqkJ9U9CW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 829 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIvBAEBCAAZBQJYptXuEhwxMHdhbGxzQGdtYWlsLmNvbQAKCRBxO1/inBRdRT/u D/4o+cMR2Iu2bMKouSjSJoGilnNziM4jNbmtx5K5yRxlsoU0AKfcTHYV28nL0DFy ucgOKoySvRiyZ5wzo32VDGlLfAvOA4gnXDKWZC4RrZ296sUC2MmYLVXLGepJeoVE ochplH2hCBOiUOoxCejOpglZJAwUwvGyFczMAF+mbL0exAHLN5ge4FFLS4xjdNkn 73Hl5dPePAfuunb2L7YBBA+ZtJ8pX3Pt6T10UUGX1Y9Pn9mVoQ1Bu4nQcTU8R03n K6s/HdFwESbx7cAcJ6cMoKUPtN/iIMTeWquGMwInQtpRr0fGZ2KFO73JUxItiWWy JExe8AV+14Etai8pwvMuMHqoWLOrHpAts7nft1bSED6GIcXv5VA9vcUwHHUwuoLG dn/Jj3Bmu28VcWESGxfRICYfr8ZYDqKCHO7vWl/6/Mkp7l0H42cNPZwDwKq8DBKQ k7V4+Qsh4UbCG+ljunTMQxzNEisEhYJ5S+cTmzBA6YyF5v/C2Cua4g/HAjPoFNOB KfjUDJKLZBgzAY/gOC4AUxORPbHTa8+eJOQW4hk46Dg8293sYk0kxceRO4PpwD4I KXjyBj7ZcB2tn2J6ZHziGkpowOu3QAjhZSM+REoKfZMaMctA9UltDJqCo9P7EC+r SmGpI2lk2Fc5yODkry2PqEHefgOmJL9FX8Jo4cuc5cS7JQ== =4msW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oHNHQpqiAPH805init3A5CkhKqkJ9U9CW--