public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix ICE with __builtin_bit_cast [PR98469]
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:01:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <989b7d53-25fe-dc11-63a1-deaf18df615c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210104204820.GB725145@tucnak>

On 1/4/21 3:48 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:44:46PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> This change is OK, but part of the problem is that we're trying to do
>> overload resolution for an S copy/move constructor, which we shouldn't be
>> because bit_cast is a prvalue, so in C++17 and up we should use it to
>> directly initialize the target without any implied constructor call.
>>
>> It seems we're mishandling this because the code in
>> build_special_member_call specifically looks for TARGET_EXPR or CONSTRUCTOR,
>> and BIT_CAST_EXPR is neither of those.
>>
>> Wrapping a BIT_CAST_EXPR of aggregate type in a TARGET_EXPR would address
>> this, and any other places that expect a class prvalue to come in the form
>> of a TARGET_EXPR.
> 
> I can try that tomorrow.  Won't that cause copying through extra temporary
> in some cases though, or is that guaranteed to be optimized?

It won't cause any extra copying when it's used to initialize another 
object (like the return value of std::bit_cast).  Class prvalues are 
always expressed with a TARGET_EXPR in the front end; the TARGET_EXPR 
melts away when used as an initializer, it only creates a temporary when 
it's used in another way.

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-04 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-30  9:13 Jakub Jelinek
2021-01-04 20:44 ` Jason Merrill
2021-01-04 20:48   ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-01-04 21:01     ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2021-01-05 15:26       ` [PATCH] c++, v2: " Jakub Jelinek
2021-01-05 16:00         ` Jason Merrill
2021-01-07 21:11         ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=989b7d53-25fe-dc11-63a1-deaf18df615c@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).