From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] remove %G and %K support from pretty printer and -Wformat (PR 98512)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:38:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99873677d1c64cdd24a732b966cd7a12ce25c1c0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f17c0456-45c0-2bd1-42a4-aa8557b69783@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 17:30 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> This final diff removes the handlers for %G and %K from the pretty
> printer and the support for the directives from c-format.c so that
> using them will be diagnosed.
I think this is OK once the other patches in the kit are approved.
Presumably if a new GCC tries to compile an older GCC that uses these
codes, we'll get warnings about them, but IIRC those are ignored in the
1st stage of the bootstrap, right?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 18:58 [PATCH] improve warning suppression for inlined functions (PR 98465, 98512) Martin Sebor
2021-01-21 17:34 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-21 18:24 ` Martin Sebor
2021-01-21 19:01 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-21 20:24 ` Martin Sebor
2021-01-21 23:46 ` Martin Sebor
2021-01-30 2:56 ` PING " Martin Sebor
2021-02-06 17:12 ` PING 2 " Martin Sebor
2021-02-15 0:40 ` PING 3 " Martin Sebor
2021-05-19 13:41 ` David Malcolm
2021-06-10 23:24 ` [PATCH 0/4] improve warning suppression for inlined functions (PR 98512) Martin Sebor
2021-06-10 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] introduce diagnostic infrastructure changes " Martin Sebor
2021-06-11 17:04 ` David Malcolm
2021-06-15 23:00 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-28 18:10 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-30 22:55 ` [PATCH " David Malcolm
2021-07-01 19:43 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-10 23:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] remove %G and %K from calls in front end and middle end " Martin Sebor
2021-06-30 15:39 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-30 19:45 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-30 23:35 ` David Malcolm
2021-07-01 20:14 ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-02 6:56 ` Aldy Hernandez
2021-07-02 21:53 ` Jeff Law
2021-07-02 20:52 ` David Malcolm
2021-07-02 22:15 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-10 23:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] remove %K from error() calls in the aarch64/arm back ends " Martin Sebor
2021-06-11 7:53 ` Christophe Lyon
2021-06-11 13:10 ` Christophe Lyon
2021-06-11 14:47 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-11 9:58 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-06-11 14:46 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-30 19:56 ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-01 8:01 ` Christophe LYON
2021-07-01 14:45 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-10 23:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] remove %G and %K support from pretty printer and -Wformat " Martin Sebor
2021-06-30 16:17 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-30 23:38 ` David Malcolm [this message]
2021-07-06 20:15 ` [PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-07-07 9:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-07-07 9:47 ` Christophe Lyon
2021-07-07 10:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-02-19 4:28 ` [PATCH] improve warning suppression for inlined functions (PR 98465, 98512) Jeff Law
2021-02-19 10:57 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99873677d1c64cdd24a732b966cd7a12ce25c1c0.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=msebor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).