From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57811 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2018 13:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57770 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2018 13:26:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*x:2.2104, H*UA:2.2104, HMime-Version:2104, H*f:sk:5BC06E4 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:26:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD2D81396; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:26:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PJCA_AUzi5QV; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:26:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.8.4] (unknown [10.10.8.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47E9981385; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:26:02 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: [patch] allow target config to state r18 is fixed on aarch64 From: Olivier Hainque In-Reply-To: <61086D8E-D10F-41AD-AF87-07D291902577@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:38:00 -0000 Cc: Kyrill Tkachov , GCC Patches , "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , James Greenhalgh , Marcus Shawcroft , nd Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <9CA5021B-1727-4B2D-99FD-8A90A95FC1BC@adacore.com> References: <3FA70C04-A7B3-4C74-AFF7-7BAC7C2C0DBC@adacore.com> <5BC06E4F.7020405@foss.arm.com> <61086D8E-D10F-41AD-AF87-07D291902577@adacore.com> To: Sam Tebbs X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg01112.txt.bz2 > On 18 Oct 2018, at 15:10, Olivier Hainque wrote: > > The only difference there would be wrt to this part > is the use of the macro within called_used_regs[] as well, > part of what we discussed with Kyrill. Ah, no, call_used[r18] is 1 currently. Will give this some thought ...