From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F9A3858D32 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 18:03:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 82F9A3858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 82F9A3858D32 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1700330600; cv=none; b=Zc8mFdfWKFVkkH+UYzM3xzazCGDpfkaD7W1PJ98VuUov/eZD97GHo8mHqKfP0sYFgnO68YD8WAhxn5fSgBe1zeJoKcvYKY4PMigSgQVEuV/d9E8IfMB38gaX/ZdUMET0XOZh4iwOVhLvI5S76m7b2lcBWD5cMuaYn96AncrZuMQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1700330600; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2BEOc2MsuPzkQ8dxLla1SX96iBA5vpYWbejTO1JZrYc=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=HFXNWz3xluWb/9HByjKMuSWMXmSmAzfopc5rHqsM8Dn5lOpWKuzp3n5Levf6l5dSXOKmlZ3i2V+WJfImnw7g7CQq4zyuXyjNjG+JUurVcYAks8O9SOu7mTPeBAwJOjTsa4FNKFPtqiRrcCXEDttXUbNKUEGLtUFRtg/FSO62ZQI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1ce5e65ba37so11548525ad.1 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:03:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1700330597; x=1700935397; darn=gcc.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=91tvSrPYYSMA12qbgXPmBhQxNdDdpj2vkaNrx9lwGbM=; b=VfAAQ3xkgDWBx6jqw9quHg4n/KvAARfS/4RiSZSt0Y7l0VRMBgWZa/NKbzQ2E/Oyxt V90Bgg+SWEkdgaoeknQMlbDIw4qgyHzzyLAPCR136pSO7iQJRbNCMqgwD8+9vlMZQrgE KiOnEL8rLGvSK0umkUaleHVE7Yp8LgF58v3+HrdQON8ce9ZrKn1wWIRai14J9KZOqxom aFiMi8PCgYq3sJ3xd4m+QjyKpcdX6CJqgLZgbeoJIuopRAPkEvJr00LUsnumXf3jQVlb qJ61529i+6zaNOSAQ0JZyxiRkydIYY6l55e2UfWn82BoQGLGYBHgSLOKmAakDK9pj+o4 6e1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700330597; x=1700935397; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=91tvSrPYYSMA12qbgXPmBhQxNdDdpj2vkaNrx9lwGbM=; b=OIuTG/O+OeJY0/pdKLUJPOmvQXGwzKG+tAoxHrrJrQpubCUcSSLMnF/ka2/mt8yjjm weZskBYphxKs9D//jmREtGWABCIO6sf2c7Fb96YFqgCGY2TY5dczFs2NPdfuNiaM/k14 guhOKlR5Lgta0njooK+6BVpUM7r0rPYTSidueqP57pFKfyBaSdHYLHBhrIItbjDLgQSm 7P3NjEImzBocGFZcs6AIzo96uRrNb6O+6ucDWhqm4cpX9YYSUZqKpsYVdmhEGBf6X083 bjmYPVT2Cb9xvj3dJrkdoZuMCk9bNnrGN7BhAuokgptSBAp28XBHkfrYoGprYSHvDhHC alsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx5NzGdYplIDPcqbctFI84NsmujlOwuLA/VgSv3LAwkg1DHfShp E9OinryFcDCk78KSOIuf4/fAtlGtAdv+Iw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEhieNGfZrmRzK0bZBnB3x0CcxPc/pIUOKC8NngGydc3oa037otNtDR+/YpsyJAmzB5idvYgg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d48f:b0:1cc:5549:aab8 with SMTP id c15-20020a170902d48f00b001cc5549aab8mr3568843plg.5.1700330597118; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:03:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.31.0.109] ([136.36.130.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jd22-20020a170903261600b001c61901ed37sm3277622plb.191.2023.11.18.10.03.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:03:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9a2f5693-1ff4-4f8b-9e9d-ff9be76ec2e1@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:03:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/44] RISC-V/testsuite: Add branchless cases for FP cond-move operations Content-Language: en-US To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Andrew Waterman , Jim Wilson , Kito Cheng , Palmer Dabbelt References: From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 11/18/23 09:50, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Verify, for short forward branch, T-Head, Ventana and Zicond targets and > the ordered floating-point conditional-move operations that already work > as expected, that if-conversion triggers via `noce_try_cmove' at the > respective sufficiently high `-mbranch-cost=' settings that make > branchless code sequences produced by if-conversion cheaper than their > original branched equivalents, and that extraneous instructions such as > SNEZ, etc. are not present in output. Cover all ordered floating-point > relational operations to make sure no corner case escapes. > > gcc/testsuite/ > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifge-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifge-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifge-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifge-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifgt-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifgt-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifgt-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifgt-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifle-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifle-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifle-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifle-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdiflt-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdiflt-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdiflt-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdiflt-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifne-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifne-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifne-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movdifne-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifge-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifge-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifge-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifge-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifgt-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifgt-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifgt-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifgt-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifle-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifle-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifle-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifle-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsiflt-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsiflt-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsiflt-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsiflt-zicond.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifne-sfb.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifne-thead.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifne-ventana.c: New test. > * gcc.target/riscv/movsifne-zicond.c: New test. Is this dependent on any of the other patches in this series? Or is it independent and ready to go as-is? I ask becuase it's marked as 13/44 and I haven't seen the other 43 patches in the series :-) If it's independent and been tested, then it's OK for the trunk. I'll trust your regexps :-) jeff