From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C123898398 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 07:48:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 29C123898398 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1669448909; bh=X3NKDf2Dy7DqSUyIQLECz1B1OGEhHPyIXeZ0JCEg7S0=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mEqBcAQUtJTD1QIK4b4Q8Rgcux3uFRvbQ9JwTB9NCNNUuxUtpBLBGFHfQyoIgfPM6 fVbkvN8TKz2yENIYBZp7rhjgcvWY7v9q7Pplvt7elNX9fIXN+14TqZ3RMTsJO86CYU xjpgGYXGl9HmSltiYFtponQsSWlSj/855Y6dIu/Y= Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B98E668EE; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 02:48:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <9b5cdf691510b783f42d3de6099c5bbe9b931236.camel@xry111.site> Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/56] gcc: Re-add TYPE_METHODS. From: Xi Ruoyao To: Zopolis0 , Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 15:48:26 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,TXREP,T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR,T_SPF_TEMPERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, 2022-11-26 at 18:30 +1100, Zopolis0 via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Re-adding a field to all types is a no-go >=20 > To be entirely honest, my current priority is simply to get this > merged so I can spend less time keeping up with upstream changes > breaking everything and spend more time actually improving things. The > additional labour cost for the maintainer who is making the change and > understands it deeply is much less than what it takes for me to bisect > the issue, find the commit, understand it and fix the issue. No. Java was removed to reduce the maintenance burden, you can't just reintroduce the burden and say "hey, I don't want to pay for the burden so you please do it". And we are in stage 3 now so it's not possible to merge 50+ patches (completely not reviewed in stage 1) until GCC 14 stage 1 opens. --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University