From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90327 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2017 15:33:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 87764 invoked by uid 89); 13 Mar 2017 15:33:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HCc:U*andreast X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:33:33 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx16.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEF6C009A1F; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.10.124.127]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C62A2D655; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Updating config.guess To: Gerald Pfeifer , Richard Biener References: <5742CA86.10200@foss.arm.com> <80ed20a2-fff0-a156-3071-87d588c79a39@redhat.com> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan , Andreas Tobler , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <9c0d5e6f-a31b-e6be-2afb-288236dc40b7@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:33:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00659.txt.bz2 On 03/07/2017 01:01 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Jeff Law wrote: >>> When/if this has been accepted, is it okay to pull the latest config.guess >>> into GCC even at this stage of the release process? (We're only looking >>> at this change and the addition of nsx-tandem compared to what we have >>> right now.) >> If it's just those, I'd think it'd be reasonable. > > Here is the entire difference between the config.guess we have > and upstream. > Yea, fine with me. Jeff