From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <morin-mikael@orange.fr>
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-26.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.26])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4D13858C52
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:30:40 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EB4D13858C52
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orange.fr
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=orange.fr
Received: from [192.168.1.17] ([86.215.174.255])
	by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA
	id dGHuo0IRFg7y2dGHvofZAy; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:30:39 +0200
X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.17]
X-ME-Auth: bW9yaW4tbWlrYWVsQG9yYW5nZS5mcg==
X-ME-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:30:39 +0200
X-ME-IP: 86.215.174.255
Message-ID: <9c160a28-6907-e3a5-d824-850b5ffe0927@orange.fr>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:30:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: error recovery while simplifying intrinsic
 UNPACK [PR107054]
Content-Language: fr
To: fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <trinity-00fca6df-5ba0-4282-afff-39debc94a9ae-1664305529428@3c-app-gmx-bap61>
From: Mikael Morin <morin-mikael@orange.fr>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-00fca6df-5ba0-4282-afff-39debc94a9ae-1664305529428@3c-app-gmx-bap61>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

Le 27/09/2022 à 21:05, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit :
> Dear all,
> 
> invalid input may trigger an assert while trying to simplify an
> expression involving the intrinsic UNPACK and when the constructor
> is lacking sufficient valid elements.  The obvious solution is to
> replace the assert by a condition that terminates simplification
> in that case.
> 
> Report and testcase by Gerhard.
> 
> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?
> 
> This is a 10/11/12/13 regression and shall be backported.
> 
OK, thanks.