From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 371F53858402 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 371F53858402 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 369FE21981; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1636728270; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2ST6ywadyywazBYNM458uEJKzZVoPZQjUTPhUmAtbm0=; b=hqZVXz8mwzUD8FtF/D+Urat9mESOW61LRb+OwMATGY91zWunubsfhd2fi6E4BBeAGJFAjS WHGZ7FKFYGfY8bsQDtjbSsRsz2ekgMSqCzf7DfFJYUOBVxDfIsgAZOCYgHEqdzzgQrgBRZ ZYNp+P13URL8GlPQbMDN/PizNTztDRo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1636728270; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2ST6ywadyywazBYNM458uEJKzZVoPZQjUTPhUmAtbm0=; b=8lCrAxYiZLjriroeFN/hfRKP0B6i5v2pjtnLcO89H5sY69IBnX8W4AzgMKWY/idfMZc3jK RvWxnZREKxRK98Ag== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D70413AC1; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id nZBEAs59jmGsSgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:30 +0000 Message-ID: <9e53e7e4-3268-7970-c4e7-dacb808e05e2@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:44:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code. Content-Language: en-US To: "H.J. Lu" , Hongtao Liu Cc: Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , Tobias Burnus , GCC Patches References: <499b9ae2-1365-a954-ed5e-35aede5d0def@suse.cz> <20211108085918.GH2710@tucnak> <3376e0dd-9f8e-ebac-eaef-4f02865807c3@suse.cz> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:44:33 -0000 On 11/12/21 15:41, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:27 AM Martin Liška wrote: >> >> On 11/8/21 15:19, Jeff Law wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/8/2021 2:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:45:39AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: >>>>> This fixes issue reported in the PR. >>>>> >>>>> Ready to be installed? >>>> I'm not sure. liboffloadmic is copied from upstream, so the right >>>> thing if we want to do anything at all (if we don't remove it, nothing >>>> bad happens, the condition is never true anyway, whether removed away >>>> in the source or removed by the compiler) would be to let Intel fix it in >>>> their source and update from that. >>>> But I have no idea where it even lives upstream. >>> I thought MIC as an architecture was dead, so it could well be the case that there isn't a viable upstream anymore for that code. >>> >>> jeff >> >> @H.J. ? >> > > We'd like to deprecate MIC offload in GCC 12. We will remove all traces of > MIC offload in GCC 13. I see. So do you want the patch to be installed or not? Cheers, Martin > >