From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58DD3858C51
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 May 2022 07:54:12 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A58DD3858C51
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com
Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C5C33E0D;
 Tue, 17 May 2022 03:54:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from naga.home (188-23-165-27.adsl.highway.telekom.at
 [188.23.165.27])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6F7133E0B;
 Tue, 17 May 2022 03:54:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 09:54:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Tobias Burnus <Tobias_Burnus@mentor.com>
cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] Add OpenMP by-GCC-version implementation status
In-Reply-To: <e96ff6c1-bb09-629d-258b-b98cf158592e@mentor.com>
Message-ID: <9e69d81a-1bed-68f8-f97a-5b7daec5a517@pfeifer.com>
References: <798bc8e6-567b-5ed6-e298-655948e89f5e@mentor.com>
 <e96ff6c1-bb09-629d-258b-b98cf158592e@mentor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 07:54:14 -0000

On Mon, 16 May 2022, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> PPS: I think we should consider to further cleanup/consolidate both the
> generic gomp landing page and the http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/openmp wiki.
> Current the information is too far spread and too difficult to find.

Yes, that sounds like a great idea, too. :)

A minor detail:

> +<p>Please add <q>openmp</q> to the keywords field when filling a
> +<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/">bug report</a>.</p>

Might it be better to instead link to <a href="../../bugs/"> ?

Gerald

PS: For the benefit of the doubt: Ok.