From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] c++: Track lifetimes in constant evaluation [PR70331,PR96630,PR98675]
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:42:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e81ff7d-5f20-eae9-32f7-7d1806bd2a29@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZLj/54VvX7Xz7wRk@Thaum.localdomain>
On 7/20/23 05:35, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> This adds rudimentary lifetime tracking in C++ constexpr contexts,
> allowing the compiler to report errors with using values after their
> backing has gone out of scope. We don't yet handle other ways of
> accessing values outside their lifetime (e.g. following explicit
> destructor calls).
Incidentally, much of that should be straightforward to handle by no
longer ignoring clobbers here:
> case MODIFY_EXPR:
> if (cxx_dialect < cxx14)
> goto fail;
> if (!RECUR (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0), any))
> return false;
> /* Just ignore clobbers. */
> if (TREE_CLOBBER_P (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1)))
> return true;
Assignment from a clobber represents end of lifetime to the middle-end.
This can be a follow-up patch.
> @@ -7051,10 +7065,17 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
> return ctx->ctor;
> if (VAR_P (t))
> if (tree v = ctx->global->get_value (t))
> - {
> - r = v;
> - break;
> - }
> + {
> + r = v;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (ctx->global->is_outside_lifetime (t))
> + {
> + if (!ctx->quiet)
> + outside_lifetime_error (loc, t);
> + *non_constant_p = true;
> + break;
> + }
Shouldn't this new check also be under the if (VAR_P (t))? A CONST_DECL
can't go out of scope.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 9:33 [PATCH v4 0/3] c++: Track lifetimes in constant evaluation [PR70331, ...] Nathaniel Shead
2023-07-20 9:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] c++: Track lifetimes in constant evaluation [PR70331,PR96630,PR98675] Nathaniel Shead
2023-07-20 14:42 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2023-07-22 5:28 ` Nathaniel Shead
2023-07-20 9:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] c++: Improve constexpr error for dangling local variables [PR110619] Nathaniel Shead
2023-07-20 15:46 ` Jason Merrill
2023-07-21 5:39 ` Nathaniel Shead
2023-07-21 21:44 ` Jason Merrill
2023-07-22 5:20 ` Nathaniel Shead
2023-07-20 9:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] c++: Improve location information in constant evaluation Nathaniel Shead
2023-07-20 17:00 ` Jason Merrill
2023-07-22 5:26 ` Nathaniel Shead
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e81ff7d-5f20-eae9-32f7-7d1806bd2a29@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nathanieloshead@gmail.com \
--cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).