From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24011 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2017 21:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23999 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2017 21:55:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*gerald, HTo:U*gerald X-HELO: mtlfep01.bell.net Received: from belmont79srvr.owm.bell.net (HELO mtlfep01.bell.net) (184.150.200.79) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 21:55:54 +0000 Received: from bell.net mtlfep01 184.150.200.30 by mtlfep01.bell.net with ESMTP id <20170225215552.VNZR15701.mtlfep01.bell.net@mtlspm02.bell.net> for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:55:52 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.10] (really [174.91.91.223]) by mtlspm02.bell.net with ESMTP id <20170225215552.IWEB14919.mtlspm02.bell.net@[192.168.2.10]>; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:55:52 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new hook for max_align_t_align Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: John David Anglin In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:13:00 -0000 Cc: Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , Florian Weimer , Carlos O'Donell , Jason Merrill , Bernd Edlinger , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <305D4697-79B3-4B69-8741-98BFC00A5ECE@bell.net> <856A3FEF-7A0D-43D4-9CBF-23939E7861C4@bell.net> <6C68EDB9-5933-4127-978E-807ABC7F31C7@bell.net> <519be582-d8e5-a6ef-f699-90a21250180b@bell.net> <88e889ee-dec9-5fef-db19-02f4d91d9156@redhat.com> <20161012072540.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161012080208.GK7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <6f8d9eff-adef-79a4-b67d-732106705d40@redhat.com> To: Gerald Pfeifer X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg01562.txt.bz2 On 2017-02-25, at 12:25 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, John David Anglin wrote: >>> It's really hard to make an argument to do anything other than deprecate >>> that platform. Given John's ongoing involvement it's much harder to >>> deprecate 64bit linux (and consequently 64bit hpux). >> I believe that deprecating the 32-bit HP-UX platform makes sense. There= =20 >> is no HP involvement in hppa, ia64 or alpha open source that I am aware= =20 >> of, so deprecating gcc platforms with HP systems is reasonable. >>=20 >> My primary focus is open source and one less platform will free some tim= e. >=20 > Sooo, why not deprecate 32-bit HP-UX with GCC 7? GCC 7 is in reasonable shape on 32-bit HP-UX. I'll do it after it is relea= sed. Dave -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net