From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAFEA385840F for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:15:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AAFEA385840F Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id r9-20020a7bc089000000b00332f4abf43fso7833815wmh.0 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:15:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8gacmjK3f/OazUj3UVW8GxX+z0sm/XC8P7eiYLXHqbw=; b=dn/wzCdaPbRLtFop+Z9PZaHGhS0Yujddet8mGXVIZ+xQZop4lnwLSBjDqMzfGntPEN ldxjrZNkys4DBusP+P/D3d0nlDIOYzNzzTLkG8Bx+fCByhtOqSgCeHQMr7qsk2T1SJZF cHzQTTFGa6CXMPiisGh9Wg+zvFjtDqAvfyQzkFidddAB2FWuzIpd7X1dkVxybJC2joOF qeRl3UOCZcBOOJrVIZ8EnfE06z1EXloso5WIt1CXIWinFbNFmvENUitwOmnGSEdCLY00 bjr9ek21101dkqnYhKORXWXA/Ih45W7fly3CFBIO3IkHq7KqHeCj//gt5l8h1KTlgfjd 1jrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532o/7Q4mb2Bx7fPtFZISIO+Xk5zzVGB2aktW2yohnEpP3e2kVY4 yEUN6BaoVdMrEaF+U9FsRNU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUcsPhsJpJwO85M6tW3vDCwTauF8RlcipWQ+E3gwCfb1RE2WGLKolIH3RxOVaSiKUC01e+xw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:158:: with SMTP id 85mr36947636wmb.182.1636744499673; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:14:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dynamic-095-118-045-251.95.118.pool.telefonica.de. [95.118.45.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v8sm6553571wrd.84.2021.11.12.11.14.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:14:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 20:14:58 +0100 From: Richard Biener To: "H.J. Lu" , "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" , =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= , Hongtao Liu CC: Jakub Jelinek , GCC Patches , Tobias Burnus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code. User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <499b9ae2-1365-a954-ed5e-35aede5d0def@suse.cz> <20211108085918.GH2710@tucnak> <3376e0dd-9f8e-ebac-eaef-4f02865807c3@suse.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:15:02 -0000 On November 12, 2021 3:41:41 PM GMT+01:00, "H=2EJ=2E Lu via Gcc-patches" wrote: >On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:27 AM Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrot= e: >> >> On 11/8/21 15:19, Jeff Law wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 11/8/2021 2:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:45:39AM +0100, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: >> >>> This fixes issue reported in the PR=2E >> >>> >> >>> Ready to be installed? >> >> I'm not sure=2E liboffloadmic is copied from upstream, so the right >> >> thing if we want to do anything at all (if we don't remove it, nothi= ng >> >> bad happens, the condition is never true anyway, whether removed awa= y >> >> in the source or removed by the compiler) would be to let Intel fix = it in >> >> their source and update from that=2E >> >> But I have no idea where it even lives upstream=2E >> > I thought MIC as an architecture was dead, so it could well be the ca= se that there isn't a viable upstream anymore for that code=2E >> > >> > jeff >> >> @H=2EJ=2E ? >> > >We'd like to deprecate MIC offload in GCC 12=2E We will remove all trace= s of >MIC offload in GCC 13=2E Can you document that in gcc-12/changes=2Ehtml in the caveats section plea= se? Thanks,=20 Richard=2E=20 >