From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12178 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2011 17:22:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 12169 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2011 17:22:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:22:35 +0000 Received: from omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8F7q1h0050S2fkCA2HNYCm; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:22:32 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.8]) by omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8HNU1h00g0BKwT48VHNVfL; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:22:30 +0000 Subject: Re: C6X FP testcase fixes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <4E201FFD.2000300@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:31:00 -0000 Cc: GCC Patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4E201FFD.2000300@codesourcery.com> To: Bernd Schmidt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg01266.txt.bz2 On Jul 15, 2011, at 4:09 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > This fixes a number of testsuite failures on C6X for targets with > floating point hardware. The hardware has the following quirks: >=20 > * Divide is implemented using reciprocals; TI requested a default of > -freciprocal-math > * Multiply, comparison and conversion instructions treat denormal > inputs as zero. >=20 > Ok? Ok. I'm hoping someone might have a more elegant way to handle gcc/testsui= te/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c. I don't have any specific suggestio= n, which is why I'm approving it. If someone has of a better way to handle= it, feel free to check in a better version. :-) Watch for reviews by fp-= type people... I'd defer to them...