From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-403709-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 64696 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2015 18:24:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64672 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jul 2015 18:24:45 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-HELO: resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net
Received: from resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:24:44 +0000
Received: from resomta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.230])	by resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast	id vuQd1q0054yXVJQ01uQhjz; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:24:41 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d] ([IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d])	by resomta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net with comcast	id vuQf1q0082ztT3H01uQgLz; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:24:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix in-tree-binutils builds
From: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOr4Efh2fnzRYu+v4jFODZRV82ET9QZYzqAbWWoa5QGXDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:56:00 -0000
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A98666F1-10EA-4D1E-9172-21B07BDCF059@comcast.net>
References: <55A62FD90200007800091184@mail.emea.novell.com> <CAMe9rOo6G-73GXdaK5_EU_YXmfVUhdt5iSO8eCr=1qgFPLV6Bg@mail.gmail.com> <27496A41-4C23-49C5-93B7-9387FDB8BF8C@mrs.kithrup.com> <CAMe9rOqqJ3VuGBPs9oS3zWgyJV359bo2m83pvs=qNpVM0h=gEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOr4Efh2fnzRYu+v4jFODZRV82ET9QZYzqAbWWoa5QGXDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg01970.txt.bz2

On Jul 23, 2015, at 7:47 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:43 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Mike Stump <mrs@mrs.kithrup.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:07 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> -         $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/configure.in \
>>>>> +         $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/configure.[ai][cn] \
>>>>>         $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/Makefile.in ; do
>>>>>  gcc_cv_gas_version=3D`sed -n -e 's/^[[         ]]*VERSION=3D[[^0-9A-=
Za-z_]]*\([[0-9]]*\.[[0-9]]*.*\)/VERSION=3D\1/p' < $f`
>>>>=20
>>>> How portable is [ai][cn]?
>>>=20
>>> Should be portable enough.
>>=20
>> Are there any objections to this patch?
>=20
> Can we check in this patch?

I=92m not a build system nor a global reviewer so i have no more authority =
to say yes than you.

Seems kinda obvious and trivial to me.  The goal of fixing in-tree binutils=
 builds seems reasonable to me.