public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Turn on -fomit-frame-pointer by default for 32bit 	Linux/x86
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=JD1W7JhQuFu-AwGhkF+yr6sAxUotZpi-cFiO4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100803151320.GA27253@caradoc.them.org>

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:28:30AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Their codes won't work on ARM/MIPS nor on x86 with other
>> compilers. If this is a real problem, they can always turn it off.
>
> It is a real problem, there are many cases of it, and it only works if
> all the code in the system has frame pointers.  Unpleasant, but that's
> the real world for you.  This is something that matters to a lot of users.
>

Exactly. There is nothing there saying that all libraries on Linux/x86
must have frame pointers. On some systems, frame pointers are
omitted:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01128.html

There is nothing wrong with that.

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-03 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-26 16:41 H.J. Lu
2010-08-02 17:55 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03  9:18   ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-03  9:38     ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-03 14:03       ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 14:18         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-03 14:28           ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 15:13             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-03 15:35               ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2010-08-03 14:05     ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 14:11       ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-03 17:12         ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-03 17:24           ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-03 17:29             ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 17:57             ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-04 13:21               ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 14:29                 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-04 14:44                   ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 14:48                   ` Bernd Schmidt
2010-08-04 15:00               ` Jan Hubicka
2010-08-04 15:54                 ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 16:08                 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 16:23                   ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:05                     ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:06                       ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:08                         ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-09 12:07                           ` Mark Wielaard
2010-08-04 17:07                       ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 17:09                         ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:12                           ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 17:15                             ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:20                               ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 17:08                       ` Chris Lattner
2010-08-04 17:36                   ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 17:41                     ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 17:47                       ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-04 17:53                         ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 18:05                         ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 18:12                           ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-04 18:18                             ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-17  1:47                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-08-03 17:58             ` David Daney
2010-08-03 17:25           ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-03 17:48             ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-03 18:18           ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-04 18:52 Paul Pluzhnikov
2010-08-04 19:13 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-04 19:24   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2010-08-04 19:25   ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-04 20:39   ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 20:57     ` David Daney
2010-08-04 21:09       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2010-08-04 21:16         ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 22:07           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2010-08-04 22:16             ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 22:45             ` David Daney
2010-08-05  7:00               ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 23:11         ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-05  7:23           ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 21:13       ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-12 16:22 H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 16:28 ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-12 16:35 ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 16:52   ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 17:03     ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 17:07       ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 17:12         ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 17:13           ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 17:20             ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-12 17:26         ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-12 17:39           ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 17:39             ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-12 17:46               ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-12 17:58                 ` IainS
2010-08-12 18:22                   ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-12 17:50               ` Uros Bizjak
2010-08-12 23:02               ` Mike Stump
2013-01-30 22:24 ` Ryan Hill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTi=JD1W7JhQuFu-AwGhkF+yr6sAxUotZpi-cFiO4@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).