From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>,
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=jtjyRccr9-YNv6Fjd2ord9jicywGz7V8u_Ro=@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikVhCy6-sDTbu+PP0-B7sWeOH3FARGXj8RM8w-d@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Rodrigo Rivas
<rodrigorivascosta@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should we consistently refer to %<for%> so the keyword is highlighted?
> Now that you say... I've not been quite consistent. We could say
> "range-based %<for%>", with only a dash between 'range' and 'based'.
>
or "new-style for loop"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AANLkTi=-PdaK2bni1d7ucHNNP2nSiDeJrnfET-ueaCvF@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTikxo7955t51av28NhGt4VhA89TyFE6WNPjd_eNE@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTinP2BzdG+fnO7n=5p+hvaU_VZ+-HyDLNn2Wy2J=@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4D8A2403.5050708@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTimDRZ94xrA4OPziT7+X-bPK3xfAptTELFpVn-eR@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4D90A209.2020508@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTintp7fzurBNiiOC+cmRoLt2CF9Q4SwSe04Y1AQa@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTimWyPccxiYbYG97H9Y6ddHVHFjv+RpgM14tmNyV@mail.gmail.com>
2011-03-29 1:07 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-03-29 9:00 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-03-29 9:40 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-03-29 15:53 ` Gabriel Dos Reis [this message]
2011-03-29 16:55 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-03-29 18:57 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-03-29 20:54 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-03-29 22:00 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-03-29 22:55 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-03-31 17:33 ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-31 20:33 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-03-31 20:52 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-04-06 23:22 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-04-08 15:45 ` Jason Merrill
2011-04-11 20:50 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-04-13 13:46 ` Jason Merrill
2011-04-14 14:42 ` Rodrigo Rivas
2011-04-16 3:00 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=jtjyRccr9-YNv6Fjd2ord9jicywGz7V8u_Ro=@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigorivascosta@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).