From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-266921-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7762 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2010 15:49:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 7744 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2010 15:48:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_IB
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-px0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:48:54 +0000
Received: by pxi12 with SMTP id 12so465255pxi.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.207.18 with SMTP id e18mr10723881wfg.158.1277912932720; 	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.231.8 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimsBkdlafYqRlHCJaVpsCyqEftFiacbffKI3anO@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4BD075C9.1080502@codesourcery.com>	<4C0D0656.4060903@codesourcery.com>	<4C293731.4080500@redhat.com>	<4C293DB0.8020201@codesourcery.com>	<4C295B32.9070104@redhat.com>	<4C29F386.2090006@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTinEwkxIfJghGRQ3Wp2ReV_kvXcpM9mX_3vc354B@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTin0LXHPaAJOmStFjs0EfBAgqkET-GS6xjImjuk9@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTikZlURjKWhn8OQ_cGUx2I05DRkmQwo3AWhBr31g@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTil6czsKFNAYKnRow71iuFiOte0kgaW_dh4NXM3A@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTinM-3HwJDLNo7BBRIXELRJf-I5VMOTUSbaitZzX@mail.gmail.com>	<4C2B0569.3000500@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTimsBkdlafYqRlHCJaVpsCyqEftFiacbffKI3anO@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:51:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTil7OvvPwQo4D0N1vIjsDOQ2AQztqi_3NkIkn5i3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Resubmit/ping: peephole2 vs cond-exec vs df
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>, 	Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg03144.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>=
 wrote:
>> On 06/30/2010 06:56 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>>> This seems to work.
>>
>> Please commit then. =A0Sorry about the breakage, I guess one has to test
>> changes to i386.md on both targets.
>
> I have committed it. =A0Bootstrap continues until libjava which still
> fails for me running out of virtual memory (16GB ulimit):
>
> virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory
> make[3]: *** [gnu/javax/imageio/jpeg.lo] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory
> make[3]: *** [javax/swing/text.lo] Error 1
>

I got bootstrap failure when configured with --with-cpu=3Datom:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D44727

--=20
H.J.