From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23167 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2010 09:58:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 23151 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2010 09:58:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:57:58 +0000 Received: by iwn6 with SMTP id 6so3631644iwn.20 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.169.6 with SMTP id w6mr2077237iby.5.1276077476284; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:57:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.37.193 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 02:57:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C0F63E6.4020709@gnu.org> References: <20100608225711.GA15770@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <4C0F63E6.4020709@gnu.org> From: Laurynas Biveinis Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Make gimple.h checks conditional with ENABLE_GIMPLE_CHECKING To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Jan Hubicka , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rguenther@suse.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00882.txt.bz2 2010/6/9 Paolo Bonzini : > Laurynas, can you check? I understood the gc-improv branch was basically > just cleanup, instead Jan's numbers say we're regressing 10%? Is that bootstrap time? Now gengtype does more work (still at the noise level of the bootstrap time) and generated gtype-desc.h, which is included almost everywhere, is much larger now, although I wouldn't have guessed about 10% regression for optimizing compilation. I'll check. -- Laurynas