From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-268785-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23081 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2010 20:25:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 23072 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2010 20:25:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:25:39 +0000
Received: by yxi11 with SMTP id 11so3129644yxi.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.63.16 with SMTP id l16mr4864458yba.153.1279830337447; Thu, 	22 Jul 2010 13:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.190.137 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C48A4B5.2090708@redhat.com>
References: <AANLkTikpjfVTdapM1dOAFipXer2oTYbT7BEsx-ADK9a9@mail.gmail.com>	<4C486B20.6070404@redhat.com>	<AANLkTikaCpKqxNzhpAlkO-ODiF2Y5-bePZE1H397Rpgx@mail.gmail.com>	<4C486C44.20507@redhat.com>	<AANLkTimLWWI-Lyj4Xbakh_bCLmLphjsgwjikpFNNcoOM@mail.gmail.com>	<4C48A4B5.2090708@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:25:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTiloze9_gEqRVf6eq7f_yA_EbItpPcMRP_R81Dl0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch win32]: fix for PR target/41943
From: NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@gmail.com>, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, 	Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>, Danny Smith <dansmister@gmail.com>, 	Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01781.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 12:36 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wro=
te:
>>> On 07/22/2010 09:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>>>> We're not going to do that either. =A0The include order for all gcc is
>>>>> gcc-private > fixincludes > system.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That patch doesn't change the order unconditionally. Why is a
>>>> target option is unacceptable?
>>>
>>> Because I think it's conceptually flawed.
>>
>> Isn't it conceptually flawed to have a fixinclude header system that
>> is broken for a target platform?
>
> Not conceptually, no. =A0That's a mere bug.

Then can we fix gcc's headers to work with Win64?