From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-268748-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27340 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2010 14:36:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 27329 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2010 14:36:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:36:50 +0000
Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so210729vws.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.98.140 with SMTP id q12mr773406vcn.268.1279809408763; Thu, 	22 Jul 2010 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.190.200 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 07:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1007221450350.1429@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1007221450350.1429@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimLGOKYXTP8neiEE_GZ99qPH5pSZSLibesUcgQO@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add dg-require-linker-plugin
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01744.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>
> This adds dg-require-linker-plugin support to the testsuite. =A0Simple no=
w,
> as the lto-plugin is installed into gcc/. =A0I'll add the testcase for
> PR43373 as an example. =A0Honza - you didn't yet apply the patch to
> fix the wrong-code issue of gcc.dg/lto/20100715-1_[01].c, so I won't
> commit that testcase now.
>
> Committed.
>
> Richard.
>
> 2010-07-22 =A0Richard Guenther =A0<rguenther@suse.de>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-linker-plugin): N=
ew proc.

This adds dg-require-linker-plugin.



> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20100722-1_0.c
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> *** /dev/null =A0 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20100722-1_0.c =A0 =A0 2010-07-22 14:36:20.0=
00000000 +0200
> ***************
> *** 0 ****
> --- 1,6 ----
> + /* { dg-lto-do run } */
> + /* { dg-require-lto-plugin "" } */

This uses dg-require-lto-plugin. Is this a typo?

> + /* { dg-extra-ld-options "-fuse-linker-plugin" } */
> +
> + int main() { return 0; }
> +
>



--=20
H.J.