public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
		"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix -fno-lto (PR lto/46905)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin7DHzGrbTR-MCf62rcOXw+Wm=k60NN4t1HYF_j@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pqt1hn1e.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>>> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> This fixes PR lto/46905.
>>>
>>> It's sometimes convenient in large Makefiles to globally enable LTO
>>> in CFLAGS, but disable it again for specific files. The simplest
>>> way to do that is appending -fno-lto, but that didn't work.
>>> Add explicit code to handle this case.
>>>
>>> Passes bootstrap and full test on x86_64-linux. Ok?
>>
>> Do you really need the common.opt and opts.c hunks?
>
> Yes. The previous state without them didn't work.
>
> I also tried to do it without opts.c, but setting an 0 initialization
> value for the -fno-lto entry, but that didn't work either.

Huh, that's strange.  Joseph, do you have any idea why?  Is it because
of how flags get passed to collect2?

Richard.

> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-16 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-16 13:25 Andi Kleen
2010-12-16 13:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] Improve reporting of section conflict errors Andi Kleen
2010-12-16 13:32   ` Richard Guenther
2010-12-16 15:39     ` Andi Kleen
2010-12-16 15:46       ` Richard Guenther
2010-12-16 15:53         ` Andi Kleen
2010-12-16 16:56           ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-12-16 17:24             ` Andi Kleen
2010-12-16 20:37             ` H.J. Lu
2010-12-16 14:01   ` Nathan Froyd
2010-12-16 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] Fix -fno-lto (PR lto/46905) Richard Guenther
2010-12-16 13:30   ` Andi Kleen
2010-12-16 13:45     ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2010-12-16 16:09       ` Jan Hubicka
2010-12-16 16:44       ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-12-16 18:14         ` Andi Kleen
2010-12-18 20:44           ` Richard Guenther
2010-12-20  5:05             ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTin7DHzGrbTR-MCf62rcOXw+Wm=k60NN4t1HYF_j@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).