From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Pat Haugen <pthaugen@us.ibm.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: IVOPT improvement patch
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinNyB83vfkwZp0Lxu03H+DNpD-AvBt803pt=4qi@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinguXaw6KR1xi2Tz3O+wpRxiwAqW28+g+yJC6Lf@mail.gmail.com>
It looks strange:
+ width = (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (address_mode) < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - 1)
+ ? GET_MODE_BITSIZE (address_mode) : HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - 1;
addr = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (PLUS, address_mode, reg1, NULL_RTX);
- for (i = start; i <= 1 << 20; i <<= 1)
+ for (i = 1; i < width; i++)
{
- XEXP (addr, 1) = gen_int_mode (i, address_mode);
+ HOST_WIDE_INT offset = (1ll << i);
+ XEXP (addr, 1) = gen_int_mode (offset, address_mode);
if (!memory_address_addr_space_p (mem_mode, addr, as))
break;
}
HOST_WIDE_INT may be long or long long. "1ll" isn't always correct.
I think width can be >= 31. Depending on HOST_WIDE_INT,
HOST_WIDE_INT offset = -(1ll << i);
may have different values. The whole function looks odd to me.
H.J.
----
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
> Please take a look at the following patch -- it is less conservative
> than before and also does not lead to infinite loop (due to integer
> overflow).
>
> Testing is under going. Ok for trunk after that is done?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:51 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Richard Guenther
>> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:22 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The attached patch should fix the problem -- it reverts a small part
>>>>>> of the last patch that is needed for fixing sixtrack performance
>>>>>> regression caused by wrong iv-use costs because address offset range
>>>>>> is conservatively computed. I will revert the change first and
>>>>>> investigate better fix (Suggestions are welcome).
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since "gcc -m32" works on Linux/x86-64 and goes into an infinite loop,
>>>>> it sounds like a HOST_WIDE_INT issue.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixed the infinite loop.
>>>
>>> That doesn't make sense. Please use double_ints instead.
>>>
>>> Richard.
>>
>> I am not familiar wit this code. I will leave it to David.
>>
>>
>> H.J.
>> ---
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> H.J.
>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
>>>> index 519f66e..44f2eb2 100644
>>>> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
>>>> @@ -3207,7 +3207,7 @@ multiplier_allowed_in_address_p (HOST_WIDE_INT
>>>> ratio, enum machine_mode mode,
>>>>
>>>> typedef struct
>>>> {
>>>> - HOST_WIDE_INT min_offset, max_offset;
>>>> + HOST_WIDEST_INT min_offset, max_offset;
>>>> unsigned costs[2][2][2][2];
>>>> } *address_cost_data;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -3240,9 +3240,9 @@ get_address_cost (bool symbol_present, bool var_present,
>>>> data = VEC_index (address_cost_data, address_cost_data_list, data_index);
>>>> if (!data)
>>>> {
>>>> - HOST_WIDE_INT i;
>>>> - HOST_WIDE_INT start = BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT / BITS_PER_UNIT;
>>>> - HOST_WIDE_INT rat, off;
>>>> + HOST_WIDEST_INT i;
>>>> + HOST_WIDEST_INT start = BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT / BITS_PER_UNIT;
>>>> + HOST_WIDEST_INT rat, off;
>>>> int old_cse_not_expected, width;
>>>> unsigned sym_p, var_p, off_p, rat_p, add_c;
>>>> rtx seq, addr, base;
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> H.J.
>>
>
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-30 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-11 6:35 Xinliang David Li
2010-05-11 7:18 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-11 17:29 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-25 0:17 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-25 10:46 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-25 17:39 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-25 18:25 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-25 23:30 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-26 2:35 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-26 3:17 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-27 1:31 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-27 9:12 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-27 17:33 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-28 9:14 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-28 23:51 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-29 16:57 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-29 19:51 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-29 20:18 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-30 0:22 ` Xinliang David Li
[not found] ` <20100604105451.GB5105@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
2010-07-21 7:27 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-26 16:33 ` Sebastian Pop
2010-07-26 16:43 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-27 20:04 ` Pat Haugen
2010-07-27 20:25 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-29 3:50 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-29 5:57 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-29 7:44 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-29 8:28 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-07-29 14:37 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-29 15:27 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-29 16:09 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-29 16:17 ` Richard Guenther
2010-07-29 16:55 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-30 1:04 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-30 2:06 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2010-07-30 5:41 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-30 7:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2010-07-30 16:45 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-30 15:56 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-30 16:58 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-30 17:07 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-30 17:43 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-30 18:10 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-30 18:57 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-30 21:04 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-30 21:13 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-02 21:23 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-09 8:44 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-08-09 23:07 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-10 2:37 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-10 13:13 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-08-10 13:35 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-10 14:18 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-10 16:31 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-10 16:38 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-10 17:13 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-10 17:26 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-10 17:42 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-08-11 0:45 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-30 17:01 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-29 16:11 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-29 14:17 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-29 17:00 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-29 17:10 ` H.J. Lu
2010-10-28 19:28 ` H.J. Lu
2011-04-27 13:23 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-30 15:06 ` H.J. Lu
2010-07-30 16:50 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-30 18:28 ` Bernd Schmidt
2010-07-30 18:34 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-07-29 7:26 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-12-30 17:23 ` H.J. Lu
2010-05-25 18:10 ` Toon Moene
2010-05-27 9:28 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-27 17:51 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-27 22:48 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-05-27 23:41 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-28 9:57 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-06-01 23:13 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-06-02 20:57 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-06-03 5:39 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-06-05 9:01 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2010-06-05 22:37 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-11 7:26 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-05-11 17:23 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-11 8:34 ` Richard Guenther
2010-05-11 9:48 ` Jan Hubicka
2010-05-11 10:04 ` Steven Bosscher
2010-05-11 14:24 ` Peter Bergner
2010-05-11 17:28 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-12 8:55 ` Richard Guenther
2010-05-11 17:19 ` Toon Moene
2010-05-11 17:49 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-11 21:52 ` Toon Moene
2010-05-11 22:31 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-11 22:44 ` Toon Moene
2010-05-13 13:00 ` Toon Moene
2010-05-13 13:30 ` Toon Moene
2010-05-13 16:23 ` Xinliang David Li
2010-05-14 4:26 ` Xinliang David Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTinNyB83vfkwZp0Lxu03H+DNpD-AvBt803pt=4qi@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=davidxl@google.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=pthaugen@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rakdver@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).