From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-264529-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31686 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2010 13:45:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 31674 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2010 13:45:09 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-gy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:45:02 +0000
Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so3234625gyg.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 06:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.88.29 with SMTP id y29mr9851766qal.13.1276004698623; Tue, 	08 Jun 2010 06:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.79.65 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 06:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006081042110.7266@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <4C0DC2B4.3080200@oracle.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1006081042110.7266@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinvmA-jpVFU4uMLPm_AxKRlvMIb_ZVpbBn5Zi3G@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH C/C++] Fix some diagnostics problems
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Shujing Zhao <pearly.zhao@oracle.com>, Gcc-Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00752.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Shujing Zhao wrote:
>
>> This part is to fix some C++ i18n problems. Bootstrap with no regressions on
>> the current trunk.
>> Is it ok?
>
> OK if there are no objections from C++ front-end maintainers within 48
> hours.
OK.