From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71640 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2016 12:05:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69406 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2016 12:05:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*c:WINDOWS-1252, H*r:Wed, xgene1.md, exynos-m1.md X-HELO: eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (HELO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com) (207.82.80.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:05:04 +0000 Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3lrp0076.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.76]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-20-ucAvRMHuSxS03r5M-4wa6w-1; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:04:58 +0000 Received: from AM3PR08MB0088.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:8847::18) by AM3PR08MB0594.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:c408::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.361.13; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:04:57 +0000 Received: from AM3PR08MB0088.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7514:5aa3:e425:3ebc]) by AM3PR08MB0088.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7514:5aa3:e425:3ebc%17]) with mapi id 15.01.0361.006; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:04:57 +0000 From: Wilco Dijkstra To: Evandro Menezes , James Greenhalgh CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , nd , Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2][AArch64] Add support for FCCMP Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: ,<568C3D19.908@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <568C3D19.908@samsung.com> x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;AM3PR08MB0594;5:mxIn/goBp//At2dL7REvr9bf7P4M2UoxV4uubB0z6/h90VsoTi/7MIks8JP1jUfJmWOkJXH3OwS6R44UqHaa2qMuKJrPwTBmY4DKIWLB1yF/JYPbrqeCHu0ALUIJdaT0+8X8qD8BKg3MRF3zYkU1BQ==;24:PWj0JeggM+I+Gd2uwGQUo+s+77XNZU0qV6uxV8wmLt5QPJ5WjAAoR7Yu39Cs8KR6gi6ynTb1E6SOJsKMHtLakISpAFXJIGwxmEsnq7roXTM=;20:SwVNdnZ64VcFMiO1MazqwVcbyT9Y+SN3kJyqXSPLcgD3U3VseH9Ys/IHmzj9XE2/bkVsn86Z5KGXTms630tOtndinDs9mdsJj1VPT7J06Mwgb5aNIFRoCDEmn9QTg7EjxZNMibFpOXcwhlMrlt1QwyvX0xn9heUB/tWXVRkZTT0= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM3PR08MB0594; nodisclaimer: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(520078)(10201501046)(3002001);SRVR:AM3PR08MB0594;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM3PR08MB0594; x-forefront-prvs: 0813C68E65 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(76104003)(54094003)(199003)(189002)(3846002)(40100003)(76576001)(106356001)(5003600100002)(5002640100001)(19580395003)(5001960100002)(92566002)(5008740100001)(11100500001)(189998001)(86362001)(97736004)(33656002)(66066001)(101416001)(54356999)(105586002)(1096002)(50986999)(586003)(2900100001)(87936001)(2950100001)(76176999)(1220700001)(5250100002)(74316001)(102836003)(81156007)(5001770100001)(5004730100002)(4326007)(6116002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:AM3PR08MB0594;H:AM3PR08MB0088.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: arm.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Jan 2016 12:04:57.1754 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR08MB0594 X-MC-Unique: ucAvRMHuSxS03r5M-4wa6w-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 Hi Evandro, > Here's what I had in mind when I inquired about distinguishing FCMP from > FCCMP. As you can see in the patch, Exynos is the only target that > cares about it, but I wonder if ThunderX or Xgene would too. >=20 > What do you think? The new attributes look fine (I've got a similar outstanding change), howev= er please don't add them to non-AArch64 cores. We only need it for thunderx.md, cortex-a53.md, cortex-a57.md, xgene1.md and exynos-m1.md. Wilco