On 04/28/17 17:29, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 04/28/2017 08:12 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> >> Do you want me to change the %qT format strings to %T ? > > Yes, with the surrounding %< and %> the nested directives should > use the unquoted forms, otherwise the printer would end up quoting > both the whole expression and the type operand. > > FWIW, to help avoid this mistake, I think this might be something > for GCC -Wformat to warn on and the pretty-printer to detect (and > ICE on). > Ah, now I understand. That's pretty advanced. Here is the modified patch with correct quoting of the expression. Bootstrap and reg-testing on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is it OK for trunk? Thanks Bernd.