public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
To: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCHv5] Fix not 8-byte aligned ldrd/strd on ARMv5 (PR 89544)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM6PR10MB25664514650B06C417F78E8EE4AB0@AM6PR10MB2566.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d39b64f-67d9-7857-cf4e-36f09c0dc15e@bell.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4875 bytes --]

Ah, yes that was unexpected...
Sorry for the breakage.

So this needs to be known_eq (STACK_POINTER_OFFSET, 0)
instead of STACK_POINTER_OFFSET == 0 obviously.

Should be fixed by this patch, which I am going to commit
as "obvious" in a moment unless someone objects.


Thanks
Bernd.


On 8/20/19 4:39 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2019-08-15 3:47 p.m., Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> 2019-08-15  Bernd Edlinger  <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
>>
>> 	PR middle-end/89544
>> 	* function.c (assign_parm_find_stack_rtl): Use larger alignment
>> 	when possible.
> This patch breaks build on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot&arch=hppa&ver=1%3A20190820-1&stamp=1566307455&raw=0
> 
> hppa-linux-gnu-g++-9 -std=gnu++98 -fno-PIE -c   -g -DIN_GCC     -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/gcc -I../../src/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/../include -I../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include  -I../../src/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../src/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../src/gcc/../libbacktrace   -o function.o -MT function.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/function.TPo ../../src/gcc/function.c
> hppa-linux-gnu-g++-9 -std=gnu++98 -fno-PIE -c   -g -DIN_GCC     -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/gcc -I../../src/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/../include -I../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include  -I../../src/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../src/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../src/gcc/../libbacktrace   -o function-tests.o -MT function-tests.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/function-tests.TPo ../../src/gcc/function-tests.c
> hppa-linux-gnu-g++-9 -std=gnu++98 -fno-PIE -c   -g -DIN_GCC     -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/gcc -I../../src/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/../include -I../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include  -I../../src/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../src/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../src/gcc/../libbacktrace   -o fwprop.o -MT fwprop.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/fwprop.TPo ../../src/gcc/fwprop.c
> ../../src/gcc/function.c: In function 'void assign_parm_find_stack_rtl(tree, assign_parm_data_one*)':
> ../../src/gcc/function.c:2690:28: error: no match for 'operator==' (operand types are 'poly_int<1, long long int>' and 'int')
>  2690 |    && STACK_POINTER_OFFSET == 0)
>       |                            ^~ ~
>       |                               |
>       |                               int
> In file included from ../../src/gcc/coretypes.h:415,
>                  from ../../src/gcc/function.c:36:
> ../../src/gcc/wide-int.h:3287:19: note: candidate: 'template<class T1, class T2> typename wi::binary_traits<T1, T2>::predicate_result operator==(const T1&, const T2&)'
>  3287 | BINARY_PREDICATE (operator ==, eq_p)
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~
> ../../src/gcc/wide-int.h:3264:3: note: in definition of macro 'BINARY_PREDICATE'
>  3264 |   OP (const T1 &x, const T2 &y) \
>       |   ^~
> ../../src/gcc/wide-int.h:3287:19: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
>  3287 | BINARY_PREDICATE (operator ==, eq_p)
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~
> ../../src/gcc/wide-int.h:3264:3: note: in definition of macro 'BINARY_PREDICATE'
>  3264 |   OP (const T1 &x, const T2 &y) \
>       |   ^~
> ../../src/gcc/wide-int.h: In substitution of 'template<class T1, class T2> typename wi::binary_traits<T1, T2>::predicate_result operator==(const T1&, const T2&) [with T1 = poly_int<1, long long int>; T2 = int]':
> ../../src/gcc/function.c:2690:31:   required from here
> ../../src/gcc/wide-int.h:3287:19: error: incomplete type 'wi::int_traits<poly_int<1, long long int> >' used in nested name specifier
>  3287 | BINARY_PREDICATE (operator ==, eq_p)
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~
> ../../src/gcc/wide-int.h:3264:3: note: in definition of macro 'BINARY_PREDICATE'
>  3264 |   OP (const T1 &x, const T2 &y) \
>       |   ^~
> make[5]: *** [Makefile:1118: function.o] Error 1
> make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 
> We have the following define for STACK_POINTER_OFFSET:
> 
> #define STACK_POINTER_OFFSET \
>   (TARGET_64BIT ? -(crtl->outgoing_args_size + 48) : poly_int64 (-32))
>  
> Dave
> 

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: patch-function.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name="patch-function.diff", Size: 761 bytes --]

2019-08-20  Bernd Edlinger  <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>

	* function.c (assign_parm_find_stack_rtl): Use known_eq instead of ==.

Index: gcc/function.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/function.c	(revision 274691)
+++ gcc/function.c	(working copy)
@@ -2706,7 +2706,7 @@ assign_parm_find_stack_rtl (tree parm, struct assi
 	 stack slot boundary, take advantage of that excess alignment.
 	 Don't make any assumptions if STACK_POINTER_OFFSET is in use.  */
       if (poly_int_rtx_p (offset_rtx, &offset)
-	  && STACK_POINTER_OFFSET == 0)
+	  && known_eq (STACK_POINTER_OFFSET, 0))
 	{
 	  unsigned int offset_align = known_alignment (offset) * BITS_PER_UNIT;
 	  if (offset_align == 0 || offset_align > STACK_BOUNDARY)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-20 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-10 12:51 [PATCHv2] " Bernd Edlinger
2019-03-19 14:01 ` [PING] " Bernd Edlinger
2019-03-21 11:26 ` Richard Biener
2019-03-22 17:47   ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-03-25  9:28     ` Richard Biener
2019-07-30 22:13       ` [PATCHv3] " Bernd Edlinger
2019-07-31 13:17         ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-08-01 11:19           ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-02  9:10             ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-08-02 13:11         ` Richard Biener
2019-08-02 19:01           ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-08 14:20             ` [PATCHv4] " Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-14 10:54               ` [PING] " Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-14 12:27               ` Richard Biener
2019-08-14 22:26                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-15  8:58                   ` Richard Biener
2019-08-15 12:38                     ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-15 13:03                       ` Richard Biener
2019-08-15 14:33                         ` Richard Biener
2019-08-15 15:28                         ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-15 17:42                           ` Richard Biener
2019-08-15 21:19                             ` [PATCHv5] " Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-20  5:38                               ` Jeff Law
2019-08-20 15:04                               ` John David Anglin
     [not found]                                 ` <0d39b64f-67d9-7857-cf4e-36f09c0dc15e@bell.net>
2019-08-20 16:03                                   ` Bernd Edlinger [this message]
2019-09-04 12:53                               ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-09-04 13:29                                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-09-04 14:14                                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-09-04 15:00                                     ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-09-04 15:48                                       ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-09-05  9:21                                         ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-09-05  9:35                                           ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-09-06 10:15                                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-09-06 10:18                                   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-08-15 21:27                             ` [PATCH] Sanitizing the middle-end interface to the back-end for strict alignment Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-17 10:11                               ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-23  0:01                                 ` Jeff Law
2019-08-23  0:05                               ` Jeff Law
2019-08-23 15:15                                 ` [PING] " Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-27 10:07                               ` Kyrill Tkachov
2019-08-28 11:50                                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-28 12:01                                   ` Kyrill Tkachov
2019-08-28 13:54                                     ` Christophe Lyon
2019-08-28 21:48                                       ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-29  9:09                                         ` Kyrill Tkachov
2019-08-29 10:00                                           ` Christophe Lyon
2019-08-29 22:57                                             ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-08-30 10:07                                               ` Kyrill Tkachov
2019-08-30 15:22                                               ` Christophe Lyon
2019-08-14 11:56             ` [PATCHv3] Fix not 8-byte aligned ldrd/strd on ARMv5 (PR 89544) Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM6PR10MB25664514650B06C417F78E8EE4AB0@AM6PR10MB2566.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).