From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40267 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2015 06:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 40257 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2015 06:22:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f170.google.com) (209.85.212.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:22:14 +0000 Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so55929788wib.0 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:22:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.86.129 with SMTP id p1mr3560906wiz.71.1437805331871; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from android-4c5a376a18c0e957.fritz.box (p5B0E41B6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.14.65.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jr5sm11974754wjc.14.2015.07.24.23.22.09 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:22:10 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand From: Richard Biener Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 07:17:00 -0000 To: "H.J. Lu" ,Alexandre Oliva CC: Segher Boessenkool ,Jeff Law ,GCC Patches ,Christophe Lyon ,David Edelsohn ,Eric Botcazou Message-ID: X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02148.txt.bz2 On July 24, 2015 10:47:37 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote: >On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Alexandre Oliva >wrote: >> On Jul 24, 2015, "H.J. Lu" wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Alexandre Oliva > wrote: >>>> On Jul 23, 2015, "H.J. Lu" wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983 >>>> >>>> My test logs with the patch have: >>>> >>>> PASS: c-c++-common/dfp/func-vararg-dfp.c execution test >>>> >>>> so I think this one is not caused by the PR64164 patch. >> >>> I double checked. r226113 failed and r226112 passed. >> >> Weird. Here's the asm I got, after re-running the command used to >> compiled this test with -save-temps. I checked that the produced >> executable is an ELF32 executable, and that it completes execution >> successfully. >> >> How does it compare to yours? > >Please add -msse2: Yes, the fails appear with -m32 multilib testing on x86_64. Richard. >[hjl@gnu-ivb-1 gcc]$ >/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-regression/master/226113/bld/gcc/xgcc >-B/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-regression/master/226113/bld/gcc/ >/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-regression/gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/func-vararg-dfp.c >-m32 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -std=gnu99 >-march=i686 -msse2 >[hjl@gnu-ivb-1 gcc]$ ./a.out >Segmentation fault (core dumped) >[hjl@gnu-ivb-1 gcc]$ >/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-regression/master/226113/bld/gcc/xgcc >-B/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-regression/master/226113/bld/gcc/ >/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-regression/gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/func-vararg-dfp.c >-m32 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -std=gnu99 >-march=i686 >[hjl@gnu-ivb-1 gcc]$ ./a.out >[hjl@gnu-ivb-1 gcc]$