* Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches
@ 2011-02-07 11:51 Rainer Orth
2011-02-07 13:10 ` Uros Bizjak
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2011-02-07 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
Cc: Joseph S. Myers, Richard Guenther, Uros Bizjak, Arnaud Charlet
The following patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
[testsuite] Skip several UCN tests on systems without ASCII locale (PR testsuite/47400)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02305.html
This one requires a testsuite and/or C maintainer.
[testsuite, 4.4/4.5] Backport dg-require-effective-target avx_runtime
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02298.html
This one requires a i386 maintainer.
The next patch has remained unreviewed for 3 weeks:
[ada, testsuite] gnat.dg cleanup
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01129.html
It seems to be blocked since we have no testsuite maintainer and nobody
else cares ;-(
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches
2011-02-07 11:51 Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches Rainer Orth
@ 2011-02-07 13:10 ` Uros Bizjak
2011-02-07 18:18 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-02-07 19:23 ` Mike Stump
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Uros Bizjak @ 2011-02-07 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth
Cc: gcc-patches, Joseph S. Myers, Richard Guenther, Arnaud Charlet
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Orth
<ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> The following patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
> [testsuite, 4.4/4.5] Backport dg-require-effective-target avx_runtime
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02298.html
This is OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches
2011-02-07 11:51 Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches Rainer Orth
2011-02-07 13:10 ` Uros Bizjak
@ 2011-02-07 18:18 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-02-07 18:25 ` Rainer Orth
2011-02-07 19:23 ` Mike Stump
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2011-02-07 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: gcc-patches, Richard Guenther, Uros Bizjak, Arnaud Charlet
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
> The following patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
>
> [testsuite] Skip several UCN tests on systems without ASCII locale (PR testsuite/47400)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02305.html
>
> This one requires a testsuite and/or C maintainer.
The approach seems fine from a C perspective, though you probably want a
testsuite person to review the .exp changes.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches
2011-02-07 18:18 ` Joseph S. Myers
@ 2011-02-07 18:25 ` Rainer Orth
2011-02-08 10:06 ` Richard Guenther
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2011-02-07 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph S. Myers
Cc: gcc-patches, Richard Guenther, Uros Bizjak, Arnaud Charlet
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>> The following patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
>>
>> [testsuite] Skip several UCN tests on systems without ASCII locale (PR testsuite/47400)
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02305.html
>>
>> This one requires a testsuite and/or C maintainer.
>
> The approach seems fine from a C perspective, though you probably want a
> testsuite person to review the .exp changes.
Same problem as usual: there is none ;-(
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches
2011-02-07 11:51 Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches Rainer Orth
2011-02-07 13:10 ` Uros Bizjak
2011-02-07 18:18 ` Joseph S. Myers
@ 2011-02-07 19:23 ` Mike Stump
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 2011-02-07 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth
Cc: gcc-patches, Joseph S. Myers, Richard Guenther, Uros Bizjak,
Arnaud Charlet
On Feb 7, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> The next patch has remained unreviewed for 3 weeks:
>
> [ada, testsuite] gnat.dg cleanup
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01129.html
>
> It seems to be blocked since we have no testsuite maintainer and nobody
> else cares ;-(
Let me correct that, no one that has been approved to approve the patch cares... :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches
2011-02-07 18:25 ` Rainer Orth
@ 2011-02-08 10:06 ` Richard Guenther
2011-02-08 10:10 ` Rainer Orth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Richard Guenther @ 2011-02-08 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, gcc-patches, Uros Bizjak, Arnaud Charlet
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
> "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >
> >> The following patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
> >>
> >> [testsuite] Skip several UCN tests on systems without ASCII locale (PR testsuite/47400)
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02305.html
> >>
> >> This one requires a testsuite and/or C maintainer.
> >
> > The approach seems fine from a C perspective, though you probably want a
> > testsuite person to review the .exp changes.
>
> Same problem as usual: there is none ;-(
Ok.
With all the recent patches would you volunteer to be a testsuite
maintainer?
Thanks,
Richard.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches
2011-02-08 10:06 ` Richard Guenther
@ 2011-02-08 10:10 ` Rainer Orth
2011-02-08 10:48 ` Arnaud Charlet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2011-02-08 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Guenther
Cc: Joseph S. Myers, gcc-patches, Uros Bizjak, Arnaud Charlet
Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> writes:
>> > The approach seems fine from a C perspective, though you probably want a
>> > testsuite person to review the .exp changes.
>>
>> Same problem as usual: there is none ;-(
>
> Ok.
>
> With all the recent patches would you volunteer to be a testsuite
> maintainer?
I think I should ;-) I already suggested it to Gerald in private mail,
but have been uncertain if I'm knowledgeable enough since I'm still
reading up on Tcl and DejaGnu. On the other hand, if nobody else is
available, I'd give it a try.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches
2011-02-08 10:10 ` Rainer Orth
@ 2011-02-08 10:48 ` Arnaud Charlet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Arnaud Charlet @ 2011-02-08 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: Richard Guenther, Joseph S. Myers, gcc-patches, Uros Bizjak
> I think I should ;-) I already suggested it to Gerald in private mail,
> but have been uncertain if I'm knowledgeable enough since I'm still
> reading up on Tcl and DejaGnu. On the other hand, if nobody else is
> available, I'd give it a try.
I think that would be a good idea, since we clearly are missing reviewers
in this area, and have patches that are left unreviewed, which is too bad.
Arno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-08 10:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-07 11:51 Unreviewed testsuite, C, i386 patches Rainer Orth
2011-02-07 13:10 ` Uros Bizjak
2011-02-07 18:18 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-02-07 18:25 ` Rainer Orth
2011-02-08 10:06 ` Richard Guenther
2011-02-08 10:10 ` Rainer Orth
2011-02-08 10:48 ` Arnaud Charlet
2011-02-07 19:23 ` Mike Stump
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).