From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, "Nicolas Koenig" <koenigni@student.ethz.ch>,
"Dominique d'Humières" <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>
Cc: gfortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR35339 Optimize implied do loops in io statements
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 06:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BA409A07-2700-4F8C-B8EA-6093D1B7C4F4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53722520-52ae-0fa7-d732-f30995c9f93a@student.ethz.ch>
On 29 May 2017 17:49:30 CEST, Nicolas Koenig <koenigni@student.ethz.ch> wrote:
>Hello Dominique,
>
>mea culpa, their was a bit confusion with the file being open in emacs
>and vi at the same time. Attached is the new patch with the #define
>removed.
+static int
+simplify_io_impl_do (gfc_code **code, int *walk_subtrees,
+ void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+ gfc_code **curr, *prev = NULL;
+ struct do_stack write, first;
+ bool b = false;
+ *walk_subtrees = 1;
+ if (!(*code)->block || ((*code)->block->op != EXEC_WRITE
+ && (*code)->block->op != EXEC_READ))
+ return 0;
+
+ *walk_subtrees = 0;
+ write.prev = NULL;
+ write.iter = NULL;
+ write.code = *code;
+
+ for (curr = &(*code)->block; *curr; curr = &(*curr)->next)
+ {
+ if ((*curr)->op == EXEC_DO)
+ {
+ first.prev = &write;
+ first.iter = (*curr)->ext.iterator;
+ first.code = *curr;
+ stack_top = &first;
It seems indentation is off above.
thanks,
+ traverse_io_block((*curr)->block->next, &b, prev);
+ stack_top = NULL;
+ }
+ prev = *curr;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-29 15:49 Dominique d'Humières
2017-05-29 16:08 ` Nicolas Koenig
2017-05-29 16:34 ` Dominique d'Humières
2017-05-31 6:49 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [this message]
2017-05-31 15:49 ` Dominique d'Humières
2017-05-31 16:04 ` Dominique d'Humières
2017-05-31 19:11 ` Nicolas Koenig
2017-05-31 23:34 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2017-06-01 9:31 ` Dominique d'Humières
2017-06-01 14:19 ` Dominique d'Humières
2017-06-01 14:37 ` Dominique d'Humières
2017-06-03 13:48 ` Nicolas Koenig
2017-06-03 16:25 ` Jerry DeLisle
2017-06-03 18:12 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2017-06-05 20:39 ` Nicolas Koenig
2017-06-06 11:05 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-06-07 15:13 ` Renlin Li
2017-11-02 8:25 ` [testsuite, committed] Fix scan pattern in gfortran.dg/implied_do_io_1.f90 Tom de Vries
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-27 21:47 [Patch, fortran] PR35339 Optimize implied do loops in io statements Nicolas Koenig
2017-05-28 22:09 ` Jerry DeLisle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BA409A07-2700-4F8C-B8EA-6093D1B7C4F4@gmail.com \
--to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
--cc=dominiq@lps.ens.fr \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=koenigni@student.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).