From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-295717-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3018 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2011 20:17:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 3009 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2011 20:17:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:17:07 +0000
Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so279153qyk.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.18.77 with SMTP id v13mr1959909qca.56.1309465026358; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.214.83 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <yddr56bxkb1.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
References: <20110625161357.GA5401@intel.com>	<4E078E58.20903@redhat.com>	<BANLkTikToedVDqx9V+bB9xb+dL_r-6f31g@mail.gmail.com>	<4E07A879.70509@redhat.com>	<BANLkTik8ZOfWVUV7SV1ryQ=yJtUiCG+tqQ@mail.gmail.com>	<4E089A88.60401@redhat.com>	<BANLkTimw8O0UnnVATPKgrRCVT=82sO48Dw@mail.gmail.com>	<4E0C8361.5050403@redhat.com>	<BANLkTinOGKQCq2abZW0L7CLOQ901+Oodxg@mail.gmail.com>	<4E0C904E.8090504@redhat.com>	<BANLkTiknF6h_qJ9rAgBikdAM8O7RgSdyHA@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTimGtPskWYsGOi+hp59DKnDW7wD2sw@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTimYZoGBBUxq+uMehqGxR5E1cpEavA@mail.gmail.com>	<yddvcvnxkm0.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>	<BANLkTikRuXz1RP1LxU8BCEFoT+pNP5e_Jw@mail.gmail.com>	<yddr56bxkb1.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:59:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=4WOt4JtOYVWM0x7KeUr2Dvhazxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH [8/n]: Prepare x32: PR other/48007: Unwind library doesn't work with UNITS_PER_WORD > sizeof (void *)
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, 	Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02402.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Rainer Orth
<ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> Why all those contortions with i386/value-unwind.h? =A0It seems far
>>> simpler to me to put this into libgcc/config/i386/linux-unwind.h and be
>>> done with it.
>>
>> I did it this way so that other non-Linux x32 targets can use it.
>
> Such as? =A0Currently, only Linux, Windows and Solaris have i386/*-unwind=
.h
> implementations. =A0I'm pretty sure the latter two are highly unlikely to
> develop an x32 port, so let's cross that bridge when we get there.
>

It doesn't work since md-unwind-support.h was included much too late.

--=20
H.J.