From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18894 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2011 15:34:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 18810 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2011 15:34:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:34:19 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so2163287vxa.20 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:34:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.175.133 with SMTP id ca5mr442772vdc.82.1308584058620; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.157.9 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:34:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110620144703.GE16443@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> References: <20110620120640.GC16443@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620144703.GE16443@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch fold-const.c]: Add some missing optimizations about binary and and truth-not From: NightStrike To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Kai Tietz , Richard Guenther , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01497.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:37:30AM -0400, NightStrike wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:50:26PM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote: >> >> Applied at revision 175206 to trunk. >> > >> > There is no need to post such notices to gcc-patches, we have the gcc-= cvs >> > mailing list where this is automatically posted to. >> > On gcc-patches it just adds unnecessary noise. >> >> Until there is some way to easily map an email on gcc-patches to an >> email on gcc-cvs, or a legitimate patch tracker instead of just >> mailing lists, then it is very useful "noise". =A0I've found at least a >> hundred dropped patches so far for our project alone. =A0You can always >> just delete the email instead of reading it. > > No, our guidelines say that such mails shouldn't be sent: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html > "When you have checked in a patch exactly as it has been approved, you do > not need to tell that to people -- including the approver. People > interested in when a particular patch is committed can check SVN or the > gcc-cvs list." "do not need" !=3D "cannot" > > This has been discussed several times. =A0So no, this noise isn't at all > useful nor welcome. useful or welcome.... TO YOU. Obviously, it's useful to us. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Jakub >