From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24045 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2011 12:04:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 24035 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2011 12:04:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,TW_TM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:04:40 +0000 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4415949wwf.8 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 05:04:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.167.129 with SMTP id q1mr6114976wby.101.1307448279233; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 05:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.37.152 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 05:04:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <84fc9c000911080156iff6d687o26db10af3e9fba5d@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000911170739v76a2e911vc6794e597c8d134e@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000911190253v19390bd2le683c769bf0ab4d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [vta, graphite?] propagate degenerate phi nodes into debug stmts From: Richard Guenther To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00506.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jun =A06, 2011, Richard Guenther wrote: > >>> You meant 4.6 stage1, but I missed it. =A0How's it for 4.7 stage1? >>> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu. > >> Isn't exactly ICEing for num_ssa_operands/delink_stmt_imm_use. > > Uhh. =A0Looks like I didn't update the patch per your comments before > putting it aside for stage1, after all. =A0Sorry. > >> So, the op_iter_init change is ok, the other two not - they should >> either ICE or work for PHIs (by using FOR_EACH_PHI_OR_STMT_USE >> in them). > > The latter is legitimately called for GIMPLE_PHI, so I changed it to use > FOR_EACH_PHI_OR_STMT_USE. =A0The former was never called for GIMPLE_PHIs, > so I put in an assert there. > > Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu. =A0Ok? Ok. Thanks, Richard. > > > > -- > Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter =A0 =A0http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ > You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi > Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ =A0 FSF Latin America board member > Free Software Evangelist =A0 =A0 =A0Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer > >