From: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch gimplifier]: Boolify more strict conditional expressions and transform simple form to binary
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=_jZGm_3ZUzWU_H16M6RgK8XiWig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinbznaS6f_+U4ObhtvjefVOhxBEJQ@mail.gmail.com>
For more detail what happens and why this conditional handling is necessary:
The sample code is:
int
foo (int a, int b)
{
return (a ? b != 3 : 0);
}
leads for variant without condition boolifying of arms to:
;; Function foo (foo)
foo (int a, int b)
{
int D.1991;
int D.1990;
int D.1989;
<bb 2>:
D.1990_2 = a_1(D) != 0;
D.1991_4 = b_3(D) != 3;
D.1989_5 = D.1991_4 & D.1990_2;
return D.1989_5;
}
with this code we see
;; Function foo (foo)
foo (int a, int b)
{
_Bool D.1992;
_Bool D.1991;
_Bool D.1990;
int D.1989;
<bb 2>:
D.1990_2 = a_1(D) != 0;
D.1991_4 = b_3(D) != 3;
D.1992_5 = D.1991_4 & D.1990_2;
D.1989_6 = (int) D.1992_5;
return D.1989_6;
}
So you see that by this, the SSA variable having _Bool type, as to be
wished, and not being handled as int.
Regards,
Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-10 14:25 Kai Tietz
2011-05-10 15:24 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-10 15:34 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-10 15:38 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-10 15:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-10 15:52 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-10 17:28 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-10 20:49 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-11 9:35 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-11 10:06 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-11 10:51 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-11 10:00 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-11 10:03 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-11 10:12 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-11 10:31 ` Kai Tietz [this message]
2011-05-11 12:08 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-11 10:46 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-05-11 11:12 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-11 12:16 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-11 19:39 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-12 10:32 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-12 14:57 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-12 15:41 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-12 21:33 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-12 22:48 ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-13 10:07 ` Richard Guenther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=_jZGm_3ZUzWU_H16M6RgK8XiWig@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).