From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-291501-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23711 invoked by alias); 9 May 2011 17:12:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 23703 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2011 17:12:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:12:26 +0000
Received: from wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.101])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p49HCPjc026849	for <gcc-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 9 May 2011 10:12:25 -0700
Received: from gyd12 (gyd12.prod.google.com [10.243.49.204])	by wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p49HC171021453	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT)	for <gcc-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 9 May 2011 10:12:24 -0700
Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so2499779gyd.23        for <gcc-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 09 May 2011 10:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.60.12 with SMTP id i12mr3183205yba.88.1304961144119; Mon, 09 May 2011 10:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.11.17 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2011 10:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105091651150.21102@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20110404181738.52D661909EB@elbrus2.mtv.corp.google.com> <4D9A4BA3.6000607@ubuntu.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1104042358240.552@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <BANLkTinqtZYFaS60NPVJ=QeZdJfdjOxA+Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimXt=3nn6t+TqZ1DL3N9isDN2QPUQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikwzfYNVSSXXfs16eM0MaW2Zs9rFQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik0+NG=cJ2jP+2wLFjSXDQLKDU8RQ@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105021459150.18768@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <BANLkTikLpE85SiAzMD783fbmBJB2qnPSeA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik+TaJDqfJyO8_pJ4KsypVcS6MNJg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC81276.8040201@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105091642500.21102@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <BANLkTikBW+fj_vP+f=Y1qnUy_=MeCbLG9w@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105091651150.21102@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 18:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=kgtAuAAYQkUDMuF+3si_VLHheUw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] make default linker --hash-style configurable option
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>, Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>,        gcc-patches@sourceware.org, satorux@google.com, iant@google.com,        aoliva@redhat.com, dj@redhat.com, neroden@gcc.gnu.org,        Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00672.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> w=
rote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> Uhm, so we deadlocked, I thought the other way. =A0I cannot really
>> express any opinion about the desirability of the feature, but the
>> configure syntax is certainly okay with me, and I gather from the
>> thread that you are fine with that as well.
>
> Given the build system changes, the gcc.c changes are OK.

Ok for trunk then?

I'll wait till tomorrow in case someone has additional comments on the
desirability part.

Thanks!
--=20
Paul Pluzhnikov