From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-294088-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29391 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2011 22:05:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 29361 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2011 22:05:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:05:05 +0000
Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so1066691qwh.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.106.34 with SMTP id v34mr987427qco.111.1307657103427; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.47.78 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=hiAWmWV0GnuqJqC7cRZU9EEy3TgNtkK7ZugMj-1N+_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikXRUTmZZokg4OtJA5fBrWUG+7yZux3=CLDBox1Q+Qhtw@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTimyzxKk3bVZmHLB0c_XzSLEGaX-VA@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=9ipuRzyenO-1bHVpsx5EKmG+V=HXJ2NOipAwre6MgbA@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTikV9aCxBteBVBa4B+YCxEX4zhSm+Q@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=y6cr4auzTps9eakr0Uo8X3zxHennB8cCENh8SdFP+mg@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTimKpnPxF7iFWq7D01U-KZV0RL9Lew@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=1zc-WrJy8Lmru6+Uoc6acAPwuDA@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTin_8-jaTqSnBMVCZXYnU+amieqWrpO7zQas8a=2bWrn=g@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=B5_KxpwRo9tTjy69VwWMcJj=QmQ@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTikpK4JLpE_P8dRBxtDc_Bn9Kv4NZFgAgYADk1S-Hn=U2Q@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=hiAWmWV0GnuqJqC7cRZU9EEy3TgNtkK7ZugMj-1N+_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=quSuAmfdhtK59q02DqL-no7LT-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: -fdump-passes -fenable-xxx=func_name_list
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00773.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wro=
te:
> Please review the attached two patches.
>
> In the first patch, gate functions are cleaned up. All the per
> function legality checks are moved into the executor and the
> optimization heuristic checks (optimize for size) remain in the
> gators. These allow the the following overriding order:
>
> =A0 =A0common flags (O2, -ftree-vrp, -fgcse etc) =A0 <--- =A0compiler
> heuristic (optimize for size/speed) <--- -fdisable/enable forcing pass
> options =A0<--- legality check
>
> Testing under going. Ok for trunk?
>

This caused:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D49350

--=20
H.J.