From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3501 invoked by alias); 2 May 2011 15:57:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 3492 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2011 15:57:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 15:56:54 +0000 Received: from wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p42Fupoc011460 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:56:52 -0700 Received: from gye5 (gye5.prod.google.com [10.243.50.5]) by wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p42FuLZZ026232 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:56:50 -0700 Received: by gye5 with SMTP id 5so2169006gye.30 for ; Mon, 02 May 2011 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.203.11 with SMTP id a11mr6937924ybg.202.1304351810330; Mon, 02 May 2011 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.11.17 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:56:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110404181738.52D661909EB@elbrus2.mtv.corp.google.com> <4D9A4BA3.6000607@ubuntu.com> From: Paul Pluzhnikov Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 15:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] make default linker --hash-style configurable option To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: Matthias Klose , gcc-patches@sourceware.org, satorux@google.com, iant@google.com, bonzini@gnu.org, aoliva@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: Thanks for your comments. > When pinging, please include the URL of the patch being pinged and CC http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00246.html > relevant maintainers (in this case, build system maintainers). All of them? [I've started with two ...] Thanks! -- Paul Pluzhnikov