From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29378 invoked by alias); 10 May 2011 19:01:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 29367 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2011 19:01:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:01:16 +0000 Received: from hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.5]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p4AJ1F3x020352 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:01:15 -0700 Received: from ywh1 (ywh1.prod.google.com [10.192.8.1]) by hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p4AIxOtx008183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:01:13 -0700 Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so4218554ywh.1 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:01:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.31.4 with SMTP id e4mr79986ybe.127.1305054073357; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.41.13 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:01:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1299817406-16745-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <1299817406-16745-13-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN From: Diego Novillo To: Richard Guenther Cc: Nathan Froyd , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00788.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:19, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd = wrote: >> Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR. =C2=A0Nothing = to >> see here. > > I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this ... like always requiring > operand 2 of SWITCH_EXPRs. Could be, but I think it makes sense to do it in incremental steps. This change seems like a step forward in its own sense. I'm fine with it. Diego.