From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16016 invoked by alias); 23 May 2011 14:58:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 15993 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2011 14:58:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:58:08 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1517241wwi.2 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 07:58:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.54.6 with SMTP id o6mr2322982wbg.61.1306162686532; Mon, 23 May 2011 07:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.38.129 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 07:58:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DDA6CA0.4060400@codesourcery.com> References: <1299817406-16745-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <1299817406-16745-14-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <4DC99DAA.30008@codesourcery.com> <4DD294ED.9080404@codesourcery.com> <4DDA6CA0.4060400@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH 13/18] move TS_EXP to be a substructure of TS_TYPED From: Richard Guenther To: Nathan Froyd Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg01642.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Nathan Froyd wr= ote: > On 05/17/2011 11:31 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: >> On 05/10/2011 04:18 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: >>> On 03/10/2011 11:23 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: >>>> After all that, we can finally make tree_exp inherit from typed_tree. >>>> Quite anticlimatic. >>> >>> Ping. =A0http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00559.html >> >> Ping^2. > > Ping^3 to put it in Richi's INBOX. ;) Ok ;) Please check for sizeof () uses of the structs you touched sofar. ISTR a bug about fold-checking. Richard. > -Nathan >