From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-291763-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24295 invoked by alias); 12 May 2011 21:37:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 24285 invoked by uid 22791); 12 May 2011 21:37:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,TW_ZJ
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:37:10 +0000
Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so1151269qwh.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.43.76 with SMTP id v12mr613285qce.178.1305236230039; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.182.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=fZFk7HE7T-B+1M_f6rm+P7OhTDg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110512195514.GA14028@intel.com>	<BANLkTi=fZFk7HE7T-B+1M_f6rm+P7OhTDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 07:59:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTikc1RoWhWq73ao+Z8ixKGVGV7Ta6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Change maybe_eh_return to bool
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00934.txt.bz2

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:55 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch changes maybe_eh_return to bool. =A0OK for trunk?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> H.J.
>> ---
>> 2011-05-12 =A0H.J. Lu =A0<hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>>
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_save_reg): Change maybe_eh_ret=
urn
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0to bool.
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(ix86_emit_restore_regs_using_mov): Likewise.
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(ix86_emit_restore_sse_regs_using_mov): Likewise.
>
> OK.
>
> FWIW, the return type of ix86_save_reg (and ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok
> and perhaps many others...) can also be changed to bool.
>

I will prepare a separate patch.

Thanks.


--=20
H.J.