From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-293082-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7466 invoked by alias); 28 May 2011 19:09:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 7439 invoked by uid 22791); 28 May 2011 19:09:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:08:57 +0000
Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so1279126pwj.20        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 28 May 2011 12:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.217.18 with SMTP id p18mr492898wfg.248.1306609736479; Sat, 28 May 2011 12:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.69.21 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 12:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=ubEjm0m-WVpF8BP+sn-QJ9okeaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikWgsRiHvaGf6q0LOJdws-BuyXUMg@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=ubEjm0m-WVpF8BP+sn-QJ9okeaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 09:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimBQdDDrMWMsFqxtTx-c1RM-Q-YdA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v3] Implement pointer_traits and allocator_traits
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg02253.txt.bz2

On 28 May 2011 18:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> One more test
>
> 2011-05-28 =A0Jonathan Wakely =A0<jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/pointer_to.cc: New.
>
> Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
>

This new test is failing, I'm looking into why, will revert it if necessary=
 ...