From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch tree-ssa-reassoc.c]: Better reassoication for comparision and boolean-logic
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimPoDbbBrXAiN5VpjWNgoOt7DJuqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik+c=A4xqqMTXphcP7_b1KTptw71w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch improves reassociation folding for comparision. It expands
> expressions within binary-AND/OR expression like (X | Y) == 0 to (X ==
> 0 && Y == 0)
> and (X | Y) != 0 to (X != 0 || Y != 0). This is necessary to allow
> better reassociation
> on weak pre-folded logical expressions. This unfolding gets undone
> anyway later by pass,
> so no disadvantage gets introduced.
> Also while going through BB-list, it tries to do some little
> type-sinking for SSA sequences
> like "D1 = (type) bool1; D2 = (type) bool2; D3 = D1 & D2;' to 'D1 =
> bool1 & bool2; D2 = (type) D1;'.
> This folding has the advantage to see better through intermediate
> results with none-boolean type.
> The function eliminate_redundant_comparison () got reworded so, that
> doesn't break in all cases.
> It now continues to find duplicates and tries to find inverse variant
> (folded to constant). By this
> change we don't combine possible weak optimizations too fast, before
> we can find and handle
> inverse or duplicates.
sinking casting belongs not here but instead to tree-ssa-forwprop.
I'm not sure that a != 0 | b != 0 is the better canonical variant than
a | b != 0 though.
is_boolean_compatible_type_p looks like a strange remanent.
Richard.
> ChangeLog
>
> * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (ii: New
> helper.
> (is_ior_ne_eq_cmp): Likewise.
> (build_inner_expand_ne_eq_cmp): Likewise.
> (build_expand_ne_eq_cmp): Likewise.
> (sink_cast_and_expand): Likewise.
> (build_and_add_sum): Add forward declaration.
> (remove_visited_stmt_chain): Likewise.
> (build_and_add_sum): Allow generation of unary expression.
> (eliminate_redundant_comparison): Rework this routine.
> (break_up_subtract_bb): Rename to break_up_operation_bb.
> Additional do logical unfolding for optimization and
> primitive type-sinking for type-casts on boolean-kind
> (do_reassoc): Rename break_up_subtract_bb to break_up_operation_bb.
>
> ChangeLog
>
> * gcc.dg/binop-tand1.c
> * gcc.dg/binop-tand2.c
> * gcc.dg/binop-tand3.c
> * gcc.dg/binop-tand4.c
> * gcc.dg/binop-tor1.c
> * gcc.dg/binop-tor2.c
> * gcc.dg/binop-tor3.c
> * gcc.dg/binop-tor4.c
> * gcc.dg/binop-tor5.c
>
> Bootstrapped and tested for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu for all standard
> languages plus ADA and Obj-C++.
> Ok for apply?
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-19 13:11 Kai Tietz
2011-05-19 13:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-05-19 13:20 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-19 13:30 ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2011-05-19 13:32 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-19 13:38 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-19 13:40 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-19 13:51 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-19 15:28 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-19 15:41 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-19 15:51 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-19 16:16 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-19 17:23 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-19 19:20 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-20 10:37 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-21 0:12 ` Kai Tietz
2011-05-21 16:17 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-19 13:37 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-20 3:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-05-20 4:10 ` Kai Tietz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTimPoDbbBrXAiN5VpjWNgoOt7DJuqw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).