From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-293860-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19705 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2011 16:43:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 19694 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2011 16:43:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:43:31 +0000
Received: from hpaq2.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq2.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.2])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p57GhTGB003297	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:43:29 -0700
Received: from yie16 (yie16.prod.google.com [10.243.66.16])	by hpaq2.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p57GgJvr015775	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT)	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:43:28 -0700
Received: by yie16 with SMTP id 16so1749187yie.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.31.4 with SMTP id e4mr5629623ybe.127.1307465008118; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.142.15 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin6DK8LZEq-TbjrqWKD1oJXJG1xeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTim89r_RsLCqYjuWZMA=9Lic_4UXThZ2JJM--ajYb8epew@mail.gmail.com>	<20110601231202.224188ad.basile@starynkevitch.net>	<BANLkTikmNfvaUGopJ3OxQjHXYVx-_vyd5zgfo4DYLWWpKt_Dew@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=ndrCJGuPMqb5Hth=MfQEHTNeL0Q@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTik57D433ch9P9oH4=5xHr=J78JQAHdrsCf8Nuj8WUGMxQ@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTin6DK8LZEq-TbjrqWKD1oJXJG1xeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:43:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimRE8HNRZax+g6Fu714drsoUazAoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dump before flag
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00545.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 02:36, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

>> For one thing, you need to either remember what is the previous pass,
>> or dump all passes which for large files can take very long time. Even
>> with all the dumps, you will need to eyeballing to find the previous
>> pass which may or may not have the IR dumped.
>>
>> How about removing dump TODO?
>
> Yeah, I think this would go in the right direction.

Agreed.


Diego.