public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: Tom de Vries <vries@codesourcery.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH PR45098] Disallow NULL pointer in pointer arithmetic
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim_930jBZ6csPsrBb04mof6gfcOgQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110616152451.GA12880@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@kam.mff.cuni.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> diff -u gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (working copy) gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (working copy)
>> --- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (working copy)
>> +++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (working copy)
>> @@ -2875,6 +2875,16 @@
>>    low = lower_bound_in_type (type, type);
>>    high = upper_bound_in_type (type, type);
>>
>> +  /* In C, pointer arithmetic p + 1 cannot use a NULL pointer, and p - 1 cannot
>> +     produce a NULL pointer.  The contrary would mean NULL points to an object,
>> +     while NULL is supposed to compare unequal with the address of all objects.
>> +     Furthermore, p + 1 cannot produce a NULL pointer and p - 1 cannot use a
>> +     NULL pointer since that would mean wrapping, which we assume here not to
>> +     happen.  So, we can exclude NULL from the valid range of pointer
>> +     arithmetic.  */
>> +  if (int_cst_value (low) == 0)
>> +    low = build_int_cstu (TREE_TYPE (low), TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (type)));
>> +
>>    record_nonwrapping_iv (loop, base, step, stmt, low, high, false, true);
>>  }
>
> OK,

I think this is only valid for !flag_delete_null_pointer_checks, on
architectures where that isn't the default we have to assume that
NULL may point to an object.

Richard.

> Zdenek
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-16 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-16  6:42 Tom de Vries
2011-06-16  6:51 ` Tom de Vries
2011-06-16  7:34 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2011-06-16 12:22   ` Tom de Vries
2011-06-16 15:33     ` Zdenek Dvorak
2011-06-16 15:42       ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2011-06-16 15:54         ` Zdenek Dvorak
2011-06-16 18:10           ` Tom de Vries
2011-06-16 22:03 ` Jeff Law
2011-06-17 10:44   ` Tom de Vries
2011-06-17 10:56     ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-17 10:57       ` Zdenek Dvorak
2011-06-17 11:13         ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-17 11:22           ` Zdenek Dvorak
2011-06-17 13:01             ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-17 14:57               ` Zdenek Dvorak
2011-06-17 18:24                 ` Jeff Law
2011-06-20 11:06                   ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-20 12:26                     ` Zdenek Dvorak
2011-06-20 12:41                       ` Zdenek Dvorak
2011-06-20 13:29                         ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-20 13:35                           ` Michael Matz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTim_930jBZ6csPsrBb04mof6gfcOgQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rakdver@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=vries@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).