From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@st.com>
Cc: Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATH] PR/49139 fix always_inline failures diagnostics
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimbOiyRMOgq6Pi9M+PfehDvN3knGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DFF5185.9040700@st.com>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@st.com> wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 03:41 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>
>> Christian Bruel<christian.bruel@st.com> writes:
>>
>>> 2011-06-16 Christian Bruel<christian.bruel@st.com>
>>>
>>> PR 49139/43654
>>
>> Please use the correct PR number format here:
>>
>> PR middle-end/49139
>> PR middle-end/43654
>>
>> Otherwise the check-in notices don't get into the PRs.
>
> OK thanks, in fact I was referring to the file gcc.dg/pr43564.c (there was a
> typo in the number btw). But good indeed to send the notice into the
> original PR as well.
The code now looks like
if (node->callees)
{
/* Redirecting edges might lead to a need for vops to be recomputed. */
todo |= TODO_update_ssa_only_virtuals;
todo = optimize_inline_calls (current_function_decl);
}
I have committed an obvious patch.
Richard.
> Cheers
>
> Christian
>
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Rainer
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-21 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 9:07 Christian Bruel
2011-05-31 12:25 ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-31 12:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-05-31 17:07 ` Christian Bruel
2011-06-01 10:03 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-01 13:02 ` Christian Bruel
2011-06-01 13:07 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-06 8:58 ` Christian Bruel
2011-06-06 9:55 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-08 8:25 ` Christian Bruel
2011-06-08 9:42 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-08 11:56 ` Christian Bruel
2011-06-14 11:29 ` Christian Bruel
2011-06-20 13:36 ` Christian Bruel
2011-06-20 13:46 ` Rainer Orth
2011-06-20 13:54 ` Mike Stump
2011-06-20 14:04 ` Christian Bruel
2011-06-21 11:52 ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2011-06-21 12:07 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-20 13:51 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-01 14:49 ` Jan Hubicka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTimbOiyRMOgq6Pi9M+PfehDvN3knGg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.bruel@st.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).