From: Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: -fdump-passes -fenable-xxx=func_name_list
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimedTkp5=FudT7pm9khq5E1QEaWR3uQYvjQ5oDJ4GzCoQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=quSuAmfdhtK59q02DqL-no7LT-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Can you send me a trace? I can not reproduce the problem.
David
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:05 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
>> Please review the attached two patches.
>>
>> In the first patch, gate functions are cleaned up. All the per
>> function legality checks are moved into the executor and the
>> optimization heuristic checks (optimize for size) remain in the
>> gators. These allow the the following overriding order:
>>
>> common flags (O2, -ftree-vrp, -fgcse etc) <--- compiler
>> heuristic (optimize for size/speed) <--- -fdisable/enable forcing pass
>> options <--- legality check
>>
>> Testing under going. Ok for trunk?
>>
>
> This caused:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49350
>
> --
> H.J.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-09 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BANLkTikXRUTmZZokg4OtJA5fBrWUG+7yZux3=CLDBox1Q+Qhtw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-01 8:51 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-01 16:17 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-01 17:24 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-05 17:25 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-06 11:22 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-06 15:54 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-06 15:59 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-06 19:21 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-07 10:11 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-01 19:29 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-01 19:46 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-02 7:13 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-05 17:25 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-06 11:38 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-06 16:00 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-06 19:23 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-07 10:10 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-07 16:24 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-07 19:09 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-07 20:39 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-08 9:06 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-08 8:54 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-09 22:16 ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-09 22:24 ` Carrot Wei
2011-06-09 22:32 ` Xinliang David Li [this message]
2011-06-09 22:51 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-09 23:28 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-10 9:10 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-10 16:37 ` Xinliang David Li
2011-06-01 19:29 ` Xinliang David Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTimedTkp5=FudT7pm9khq5E1QEaWR3uQYvjQ5oDJ4GzCoQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=davidxl@google.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).